| How has 2020 treated Nick Kolakowski the writer—have you been able to work? Are you finding writing time vanishing into doom-scrolling or binging something? Is there a pandemic novel in your near future? |
|
When New York City went into lockdown, I threw myself into writing and editing. It became my coping mechanism, to such a degree that I had to step away a bit a few months later. First I poured my energy into “Lockdown,” a charity anthology of horror and crime stories that I co-edited for Polis Books; proceeds went to support BINC, which is helping booksellers through this weird time. With that completed, I finished work on “Absolute Unit,” a horror novella coming out next year from Crystal Lake Publishing; I’d started writing it last year, well before the pandemic, but it has some uncomfortable echoes with what’s happening now—mass infection is a big theme. By that point, I was pretty fritzed out, so I started trying to balance out the schedule; less writing, more actually getting outside. |
|
| How was it coming back from the dystopian-SF/Crime of Maxine Unleashes Doomsday to something very contemporary, very non-SF? |
|
It felt good! With contemporary crime fiction, you don’t have quite the same pressure of world-building as you do with sci-fi and dystopian fiction. That being said, I did struggle with the plot of “Rattlesnake” a bit—for the longest time, I had the first two-thirds written, but couldn’t figure out a way to end it that really came together. |
|
| As much as I enjoy Frankie, Jake, and Janine—the character that keeps hanging out in the back of my mind is The Monkey Man. (Shockingly, a criminal always wearing a rubber gorilla mask is memorable!) Where did he come from? Too much time spent listening to The Traveling Wilburys? I’d imagine there’d be a big temptation to go wild with the character, but you kept him fairly low-key and reserved over these two books. How’d you resist? |
|
The Wilburys were the inspiration for the name. And there was a lot of temptation to unleash him in a particularly messy/funny/creative way. What held me back was, of all things, Hannibal Lecter.
Specifically, when I was writing “Rattlesnake,” I was also watching both Hannibal Lector movies, and what I noticed was that Hannibal was a more effective character the less he was shown doing. He’s an incredibly powerful character in “Silence of the Lambs,” but aside from talking, he doesn’t do terribly much beyond his brief escape at the end; his power comes from his reputation. In the sequel, by contrast, he’s doing lots of things, and that drains the mystique from the character; he becomes something of a hammy joke. So that curbed my impulses to do something grand with Monkey Man.
Sometimes I think I resisted that impulse a little too much, though. Someone who dresses like that is no doubt capable of some freaky shit.
|
|
| Jake’s wife, Janine, is never the focus of these books, but I think she has the most interesting arc over the course of these two novels. Somehow, she and Jake have managed for years to keep her pretty isolated from his world. But in the few days these two books cover, all that’s gone away, and she reacts better than Jake (and probably Janine herself) expects. Why tell that story in the midst of all the action and chaos? Was there a version where she gets overwhelmed by everything and can’t adapt to the circumstances? |
|
Nope! In so many thrillers, there’s this cliché of a civilian character (whether the wife, daughter, husband, etc.) who falls apart completely under stress, and I wanted to steer away from that as hard as I could. Janine’s ability to deal with the situation, I felt, also gave some additional nuance to Jake and Frankie—they’re so tough that they can’t grasp that someone like Janine, who doesn’t have any criminal or combat experience, might be totally adaptable to a hard situation; it’s a huge blind spot that reveals something about their egos. |
|
| It’s one thing for authors to make specific geographic references in New York City—most non-New Yorkers have enough of a grasp of that area to mostly understand them. To a lesser extent that’s true of LA, Chicago, Boston, etc. But in Rattlesnake Rodeo, you throw around references to the Boise-area like a native, 97% of which are going to mean nothing to anyone not from around here. Is there a risk in that? Yeah, it’s a very authentic feel, but does the authenticity outweigh the potential alienation of someone from another part of the country/world? Or in the age of a search engine, does that not matter? |
|
I’m not sure there’s a risk in it. This summer, I read S.A. Cosby’s “Blacktop Wasteland” and David Heska Wanbli Weiden’s “Winter Counts,” both excellent thrillers/mysteries that take place in areas not well-trod by most crime fiction (rural Virginia and a Native American reservation, respectively). Both of those books have tons of esoteric detail about those locations, and it adds a lot of nice texture to the narrative. I look at “Rattlesnake” (and “Boise Longpig Hunting Club”) the same way—a substantial portion of the audience is never going to go to Nyssa or any of those towns along the Snake River; they’re never going to swing by Fanci Freez, which has some of the nation’s finest milkshakes; but hopefully all the detail gives them a sense of place. |
|
| As usual, I’ve got to ask, what’s coming down the pike? Are you far enough into your next book to talk about it? |
|
“Absolute Unit,” a horror novella told from the perspective of a sentient parasite living inside the body of a corrupt health inspector, is the next one (mid-2021)! Then after that, there’s another novella, “Payback is Forever,” that should come out from Shotgun Honey in late 2021. The latter is my attempt at a classic Chandler-style thriller, although there’s a contemporary twist to it that the audience will hopefully never see coming. |
|
| Thanks for your time—and thanks for another great ride with Jake and Frankie! |
|
So…things are going to be quiet around here for the next 4 weeks (at least). But we learned this week that we have to move. So, when I’m not at work, I’ve been looking for a new place and starting to pack. I’m trying to look at this as a chance to do a thorough reorganization of my bookshelves (and everything else in the house).
So not only have I not written a whole lot this week–most of what was posted was prepared weeks ago (the post Friday was the result of 4 nights of plugging away a bit at a time), I didn’t even have the time and energy to get the September report out, short version: 26 books, I think I liked all of them). I’ve read even less. This week I’ve read 3 essays, 3 short stories, and the same page of an ARC for 4 straight nights as I fell asleep. That’s a bad day’s worth of reading. For a week, that’s unthinkable. I got my copy of Battle Ground on Tuesday and haven’t read the first line. I may not stay sane for long at this rate (not just over Dresden, all of it).
I have 1 book tour this month (and one at the beginning of November), 3 books an author has asked me to talk about (1 read, 2 unread)—and I’m going to try my best to get those posted, and anything else I can manage to squeeze in. We’ll see.
I did manage to steal a couple of minutes here and there this week to look at my feeds to find a thing or two for this. So, 25 hours after I started this, I can now post it. Yeah, gonna be one of those months.
 that caught my eye this week. You’ve probably seen some/most/all of them, but just in case:
 American classics among most ‘challenged’ books of the decade in US: Huckleberry Finn and To Kill a Mockingbird among works protesters have tried to get removed from schools and libraries—yeah, this is the end of Banned Book Week, and the article was written for the beginning of it. Still…
How to Determine the Personal Value of a Book in a Few Simple Steps: What to Do When You Have Too Many Books—too many books? I guess it could happen. No one let Mrs. Irresponsible Reader see this for the next couple of months, okay?
Author Interview: Nancy Pearl and Jeff Schwager on The Writer’s Library—from LibraryThing
INTERVIEW: Ian Rankin on turning 60, not being able to hug his son in lockdown and why Rebus is finally venturing out of Edinburgh
12 Book Bloggers Share How They Find Time to Read—some good ideas here
Goodbye 5 Star Rating System. Hello Book Vagabond Badges.—here’s an interesting alternative.
RATING SYSTEM—Book in Hand has a new rating system, too
Being Objective About Some of My Favourite Books—The Orangutan Librarian talks about some problems with some of her favorite reads
What am I even doing?—The Fantasy Inn’s Kopratic talks about book reviewing
Comfort in books
 That I’m Excited About and/or You’ll Probably See Here Soon:
Battle Ground by Jim Butcher—Peace Talks set the stage for something huge. It’s now here.
Just Like You by Nick Hornby—Hornby tackles the tale of a 42-year-old mother falling for a 22-year-old.
A Deadly Education by Naomi Novik—the beginning of a series about a sentient school for young magic users, featuring a dark magic practiitionner who has enough power to kill every other student. Or Something. I think I’m going to have to read it to come up with a better summary.
 I’d like to say hi and extend a warm welcome toChar, I.F, and BookerTalk who followed the blog this week. Keep coming back, there’ll be new stuff, eventually!
I’ve spent the afternoon composing September’s Down the TBR posts and there have just been so many books in the last four posts that I have no memory of ever seeing, much less wanting to read. At the same time, I almost feel like I just found a whole bunch of great books I want to read (even if I really put them on the “Want to Read” shelf two years ago).
This meme was created by Lia @ Lost in a Story—but Jenna at Bookmark Your Thoughts is the one that exposed me to this, and as my Goodreads “Want To Read” shelf is scarily long, I had to do this.
The Rules are simple:
- Go to your Goodreads to-read shelf
- Order on ascending date added.
- Take the first 5 (or 10 if you’re feeling adventurous) books.
- Read the synopses of the books.
- Decide: keep it or should it go?
- Keep track of where you left off so you can pick up there next week! (or whenever)
What distinguishes this series from the Mt. TBR section of my Month-end Retrospectives? Those are books I actually own while Goodreads contains my aspirational TBR (many of which will be Library reads). The Naming of the two is a bit confusing, but…what’re you going to do?
(Click on the cover for an official site or something with more info about the book)
 |
Penelope Lemon: Game On! by Inman Majors
Blurb:
My Thoughts: I wish I knew how this fell on my radar. I also wish I knew why I haven’t read it yet. I’m not going to try to recap the blurb without reading this comic novel, I’d probably do a bad job of it. Just click the link above.
Verdict:
 |
 |
The Lonely Witness by William Boyle
Blurb: When a young woman with a sordid past witnesses a murder, she finds herself fascinated by the killer and decides to track him down herself.
My Thoughts: Once again, I wish I knew how this fell on my radar, because then maybe I’d remember why I thought this would be something I’d enjoy. Don’t get me wrong, it looks gripping and well-written, but it also doesn’t look like my cup of tea.
Verdict:
 |
 |
First Watch by Dale Lucas
My Thoughts: A police procedural in a Fantasy world, like DeCandido’s Precinct books. Probably a different approach beyond that, though. Looks pretty good.
Verdict:
|
 |
Middlegame by Seanan McGuire
My Thoughts: I can’t believe I’m not interested in a McGuire novel. But despite all the acclaim (and there are mountatins of it), this one just doesn’t appeal to me.
Verdict:
|
 |
An Ember in the Ashes by Sabaa Tahir
My Thoughts: This looks like a great fantasy novel, but I know Im not going to find the time for it.
Verdict:
|
 |
Dear Committee Members by Julie Schumacher
Blurb: “Finally a novel that puts the ‘pissed’ back into ‘epistolary.’…the vehicle this droll and inventive novel uses to tell that tale is a series of hilarious letters of recommendation that [beleaguered creative writing professor] Fitger is endlessly called upon by his students and colleagues to produce, each one of which is a small masterpiece of high dudgeon, low spirits, and passive-aggressive strategies.”
My Thoughts: Looks like a bit of fun à la Straight Man
Verdict:
|
 |
A Symphony of Echoes by Jodi Taylor
My Thoughts: The second in the Chronicles of St Mary’s features the historians facing off with Jack the Ripper (among with other time travel hijinks).
Verdict:
|
 |
The Gutter Prayer by Gareth Ryder-Hanrahan
Blurb: “When three thieves – an orphan, a ghoul, and a cursed man – are betrayed by the master of the thieves guild, their quest for revenge uncovers dark truths about their city and exposes a dangerous conspiracy, the seeds of which were sown long before they were born.”
My Thoughts: I’ve yet to see anything bad about this book, it looks so good. I’ve come close to buying it a couple of times, but I’ve been intimidated by the size and density of the text. (how lame does that sound?)
Verdict:
|
 |
The Disappeared by Ali Harper
Blurb: A couple of newbie PI’s on a hunt for a missing college student when the case turns out to be a lot more than they bargained for.
My Thoughts: This looks like it could be a good one, but I’m probably not going to find the time.
Verdict:
|
 |
Biting the Wax Tadpole: Confessions of a Language Fanatic by Elizabeth Little
Blurb: “Language, like travel, is always stranger than we expect and often more beautiful than we imagine. In Biting the Wax Tadpole Elizabeth Little takes a decidedly unstuffy and accessible tour of grammar via the languages of the world—from Lithuanian noun declensions and imperfective Russian verbs to Ancient Greek and Navajo. And in one of the most courageous acts in the history of popular grammar books, she attempts to provide an explanation of verbal aspect that people might actually understand.”
My Thoughts: I always enjoy reading about how English is messed up, might be nice to see how other languages are strange.
Verdict:
|
Books Removed in this Post: 5 / 10
Total Books Removed: 88 / 240
Anyone out there read any of these books? Did I make the right call with any of them?
(Image by moritz320 from Pixabay)
No introduction this morning, I’m watching a bookstore event with Luca Veste (from Bethany Beach Books) and am too distracted to say anything.
that caught my eye this week. You’ve probably seen some/most/all of them, but just in case:
Johnstown-based literacy bank nourishing minds worldwide through magazines—adding a literature bank to a food bank? Brilliant idea.
Would you find this bookstore beautiful or terrifying? Or both.—LitHub asks this provacative question about a new Chinese bookstore design (“bookstore” seems inadequate to describe this structure). Personally, I think both, but lean to the latter.
A Brief History of the Juvenile Mysteries You Checked Out of the Library Eight at a Time: How young sleuths like Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys became literary icons for generations.—Keith Roysdon takes readers on path down memory lane with the Hardys, Drew, and more.
Why I’m addicted to self-help books—I don’t share this addiction, but I get it. And had fun reading this piece.
Things I Learned About Blog Tours in 6 Months—a look back at 6 months of organizing blog tours. I’ve linked to things from the blogger’s POV recently, this look from the other side is interesting.
Critical Art of Reviews—thoughts about over-used words and phrases when talking about books.
Unlikeable Characters: Why is likability Even a Question?
Let’s Talk About Spoilers—Wish I’d written about 90% of this first.
Hiu, possibly sentient cabbage over at The Fantasy Inn, recently posted a thread about “the Feels behind book reviewing and blogging”, which is a good reminder that all of us go through the same thing (to varying degrees, anyway).
That I’m Excited About and/or You’ll Probably See Here Soon:
Next to Last Stand by Craig Johnson—I had a great time with the latest Walt Longmire book, I’ll probably be talking about it early next week. In the meantime, you should just go read it.
Hench by Natalie Zina Walschots—Here’s what sold me: “Anna does boring things for terrible people because even criminals need office help and she needs a job. Working for a monster lurking beneath the surface of the world isn’t glamorous. But is it really worse than working for an oil conglomerate or an insurance company? In this economy? As a temp, she’s just a cog in the machine.”
Dead Man in a Ditch by Luke Arnold—seemingly the whole blogiverse is buzzing about the sequel to The Last Smile in Sunder City (probably for a good reason)
I’d like to say hi and extend a warm welcome to Books Are 42 (possibly the greatest blog name ever) and The Godly Chic Diaries who followed the blog this week. Don’t be a stranger, and use that comment box, would you?
 The next day, Tom tries several times to see Mrs. Fitzgerald but gets nowhere. Fed up, he goes back to the Inn he’s staying at (a place Mr. Allworthy stayed at when in London). He hears an altercation and comes to intervene.
I was joking last week about how nice it was to see another fistfight again, and already we have a new one. They’re good for drama, I guess, and to make fast friends of whoever Tom comes to the rescue of (or vice versa). A footman was attacking his employer, and the daughter of the Innkeeper was standing by and screaming (this is what alerted Tom). As handily as the footman was beating his employer, so Tom took care of the footman.
It turns out—and you’ve gotta love this—the footman had been using his boss’s (Mr. Nightengale) copy of Hoyle and had spilled wine on an open page. Nightengale was angered, and the two started arguing over how much the book had been worth before getting ruined, so they could agree on how much to be withheld from his pay. One thing led to another…
Anyway, out of gratitude Nightengale splits a bottle of wine with Tom and they become friends, the innkeeper and her daughter join them and they all get along really well.
The next day, as masquerade invitation and mask arrive for Tom, he assumes this comes from Mrs. Fitzgerald and will be his chance to see Sophia. So he invites Nightengale to come to the ball with him—and then has to borrow cab fare from Partridge so he can afford to go anywhere. There’s no Sophia, or even Mrs. Fitzgerald at the ball, instead, it’s Sophia’s friend, Lady Bellaston, who arranged to meet Tom there.
She grills Tom for hours and finally agrees to arrange a meeting if he promises to leave Sophia alone after that. She gives him fifty pounds and sends him on his way.
Tom gets back to the inn to hear Mrs. Miller (the innkeeper, who I should’ve introduced earlier) talk about a cousin, who married for love and is now destitute and barely hanging on due to illness in the family. Tom pulls her aside and gives her the money Bellaston just gave him.
Now, earlier, Fielding told the reader that he focused on describing Mrs. Miller because she’s going to be important. I wonder how? And I look forward to finding out. A fun few chapters this week, I’m really enjoying Tom’s time in London.
|
Steve is a writer of contemporary fiction, who enjoys reading books of many different genres.
Episode (or two) you might want to give a listen to:
