Category: Mystery/Detective Fiction/Crime Fiction/Thriller Page 1 of 156

PUB DAY REPOST: The Key to a Killer by Olivia Blacke: Solving Cordelia’s First Murder Mystery—Her Own

Cover of The Key to a Killer by Olivia BlackeThe Key to a Killer

by Olivia Blacke

DETAILS:
Series: Ruby and Cordelia Mysteries, #3
Publisher: Minotaur Books
Publication Date: October 20, 2026
Format: eARC
Length: 368 pg.
Read Date: October 7, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s The Key to a Killer About?

With two solved murders under their belt, it’s time for Ruby and Cordelia to focus on one closer to home—very close to home. It’s time to talk about Cordelia’s murder.

Cordelia begins to remember more about that fatal night—which starts to point them in the right direction.

All they have to do is hope her memories continue to come back, while they’re distracted by industrial espionage, marital difficulties (obviously, not either of theirs), Cordelia’s brother, Ruby’s budding romance, workplace struggles, new ghost abilities (better said, Cordelia learning about abilities she had), a series of break-ins at their apartment building, some questionable political moves, a persistent journalist, and a few other things. Most of which could point to the solution to their puzzle. But might not.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I grabbed this to read because I’d read the first two books in the series and had to find out what happened next. I’ve been curious (as Blacke wanted the reader to be) about Cordelia’s murder since her first book. It wasn’t too long before Blacke made it clear to the reader that she didn’t die accidentally or by her own hand (no matter what Cordelia’s ghost might have thought), so I just had to know whodunit.

Also, I’d read Blacke’s last 5 books, and have found her to be a completely reliable author, and I’m now predisposed to pick up something with her name on it without much thought.

I kept going because I like the characters, first and foremost, and enjoy spending time with them. Curiosity (see the opening paragraph of this section) was obviously a driving force, too. But Blacke kept putting them in interesting circumstances, things that raised more questions than they answered, and watching the two bounce around from red herring to red herring to a thing that actually matters, just not in the way they thought…Blacke got everything right this time.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

I think The Key to a Killer—like the rest of the series, actually—has two important themes about humanity. The first is trust. Extending trust to the right people, cutting off that trust when we should, and then relying on those we’ve trusted. If we act like islands (think Simon and Garfunkel’s “I Am a Rock”), we flail. Both Ruby and Cordelia are proofs for that.

The second is the need to not be alone. Ruby needs people to keep her out of her head and for safety. Cordelia needs people to care for, to help her not make self-destructive choices, to just be around. The isolation she wrapped herself in wasn’t good for her. Ruby was likely headed in a similar direction before she and her new roommate got together.

I guess really, both of those could be summed up in a need for community of some sort—the people in their building, their coworkers, fellow ghosts, family. Now, it’s clear that not everyone in the building or at work should be depended on—and ghosts can be less than reliable (just like the living)—but in actual community is where humans, living or not, thrive.

So, what did I think about The Key to a Killer?

I do think the first in the series, A New Lease on Death</b was more entertaining—the humor was a bit more pronounced, the fun of watching the two figure each other out, and so on—made for more fun. Death at the Door was a bit more tense, with more implied danger. But Blacke topped the others here with heart and intrigue—the threat of violence seemed both more pressing and less likely (I think this has to do with the number of allies that Ruby has picked up by this time). She took everything she’s done so far and kicked it up a notch or two (except maybe the humor—but that could be in an “eye of the beholder” situation this was more about earnest effort), as she should. The result is a novel that’s just a little bit more satisfying than its predecessors.

I’m assuming that this is the end of the road for this duo. I’d be very pleased to find out that I’m wrong, but it feels like this Blacke has tied up enough that she can leave them to un-recorded adventures. If that’s the case, this is a satisfying end-point for the pair. We see them in good places, with a lot tied up, some good closure on lingering questions about Cordelia’s life (beyond the question of “who killed her”)—and Ruby in a good place, too.

Obviously, learning more about Cordelia’s final days gives the reader a lot to chew on. Without wanting to give too much away, learning what we do about her married boyfriend is rather revealing—and I’m glad Blacke went the way she did with that. In the end, she’s a more complex and flawed character than she seemed to be when we first met her spectral form.

There’s one clue that took Ruby frustratingly long to figure out—and I’m less than happy with one of her subplots was left (there’s something to be explored if Blacke goes for a fourth book). But overall, the arc she’s been on is very well done. Honestly, those two points are my only complaints about this book.

I don’t know if this is the best book to jump into things with—but it would work for someone looking for a ghosty-cozyish mystery for October. I think you’d be better off with three of the books to give you a solid ghosty story from the beginning. Obviously, I think most of the audience for this will be those like me who just want the big question about Cordelia answered and who look forward to the adventures up to that reveal (which was done so nicely).

I’m looking forward to whatever Blacke has coming next, too. I think most readers of this book will be, too.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from St. Martin’s Press via NetGalley—my thanks to both for this. This post contains my honest opinion about a book I chose to read.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

The Key to a Killer by Olivia Blacke: Solving Cordelia’s First Murder Mystery—Her Own

Cover of The Key to a Killer by Olivia BlackeThe Key to a Killer

by Olivia Blacke

DETAILS:
Series: Ruby and Cordelia Mysteries, #3
Publisher: Minotaur Books
Publication Date: October 20, 2026
Format: eARC
Length: 368 pg.
Read Date: October 7, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s The Key to a Killer About?

With two solved murders under their belt, it’s time for Ruby and Cordelia to focus on one closer to home—very close to home. It’s time to talk about Cordelia’s murder.

Cordelia begins to remember more about that fatal night—which starts to point them in the right direction.

All they have to do is hope her memories continue to come back, while they’re distracted by industrial espionage, marital difficulties (obviously, not either of theirs), Cordelia’s brother, Ruby’s budding romance, workplace struggles, new ghost abilities (better said, Cordelia learning about abilities she had), a series of break-ins at their apartment building, some questionable political moves, a persistent journalist, and a few other things. Most of which could point to the solution to their puzzle. But might not.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I grabbed this to read because I’d read the first two books in the series and had to find out what happened next. I’ve been curious (as Blacke wanted the reader to be) about Cordelia’s murder since her first book. It wasn’t too long before Blacke made it clear to the reader that she didn’t die accidentally or by her own hand (no matter what Cordelia’s ghost might have thought), so I just had to know whodunit.

Also, I’d read Blacke’s last 5 books, and have found her to be a completely reliable author, and I’m now predisposed to pick up something with her name on it without much thought.

I kept going because I like the characters, first and foremost, and enjoy spending time with them. Curiosity (see the opening paragraph of this section) was obviously a driving force, too. But Blacke kept putting them in interesting circumstances, things that raised more questions than they answered, and watching the two bounce around from red herring to red herring to a thing that actually matters, just not in the way they thought…Blacke got everything right this time.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

I think The Key to a Killer—like the rest of the series, actually—has two important themes about humanity. The first is trust. Extending trust to the right people, cutting off that trust when we should, and then relying on those we’ve trusted. If we act like islands (think Simon and Garfunkel’s “I Am a Rock”), we flail. Both Ruby and Cordelia are proofs for that.

The second is the need to not be alone. Ruby needs people to keep her out of her head and for safety. Cordelia needs people to care for, to help her not make self-destructive choices, to just be around. The isolation she wrapped herself in wasn’t good for her. Ruby was likely headed in a similar direction before she and her new roommate got together.

I guess really, both of those could be summed up in a need for community of some sort—the people in their building, their coworkers, fellow ghosts, family. Now, it’s clear that not everyone in the building or at work should be depended on—and ghosts can be less than reliable (just like the living)—but in actual community is where humans, living or not, thrive.

So, what did I think about The Key to a Killer?

I do think the first in the series, A New Lease on Death</b was more entertaining—the humor was a bit more pronounced, the fun of watching the two figure each other out, and so on—made for more fun. Death at the Door was a bit more tense, with more implied danger. But Blacke topped the others here with heart and intrigue—the threat of violence seemed both more pressing and less likely (I think this has to do with the number of allies that Ruby has picked up by this time). She took everything she’s done so far and kicked it up a notch or two (except maybe the humor—but that could be in an “eye of the beholder” situation this was more about earnest effort), as she should. The result is a novel that’s just a little bit more satisfying than its predecessors.

I’m assuming that this is the end of the road for this duo. I’d be very pleased to find out that I’m wrong, but it feels like this Blacke has tied up enough that she can leave them to un-recorded adventures. If that’s the case, this is a satisfying end-point for the pair. We see them in good places, with a lot tied up, some good closure on lingering questions about Cordelia’s life (beyond the question of “who killed her”)—and Ruby in a good place, too.

Obviously, learning more about Cordelia’s final days gives the reader a lot to chew on. Without wanting to give too much away, learning what we do about her married boyfriend is rather revealing—and I’m glad Blacke went the way she did with that. In the end, she’s a more complex and flawed character than she seemed to be when we first met her spectral form.

There’s one clue that took Ruby frustratingly long to figure out—and I’m less than happy with one of her subplots was left (there’s something to be explored if Blacke goes for a fourth book). But overall, the arc she’s been on is very well done. Honestly, those two points are my only complaints about this book.

I don’t know if this is the best book to jump into things with—but it would work for someone looking for a ghosty-cozyish mystery for October. I think you’d be better off with three of the books to give you a solid ghosty story from the beginning. Obviously, I think most of the audience for this will be those like me who just want the big question about Cordelia answered and who look forward to the adventures up to that reveal (which was done so nicely).

I’m looking forward to whatever Blacke has coming next, too. I think most readers of this book will be, too.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from St. Martin’s Press via NetGalley—my thanks to both for this. This post contains my honest opinion about a book I chose to read.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Bark Humbug by David Rosenfelt: Andy Carpenter Gets Pulled Back In (again)

Cover of Bark Humbug by David RosenfeltBark Humbug

by David Rosenfelt

DETAILS:
Series: Andy Carpenter, #33
Publisher: Minotaur Books
Publication Date: October 13, 2026
Format: eARC
Length: 320 pg.
Read Date: September 30-October 2, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s Bark Humbug About?

The sister of a murder suspect comes to Andy’s home. Her brother had adopted a dog through his dog shelter a couple of years before, which had led him to follow Andy’s career. So when he became the focus of a police manhunt, he wanted Andy to help coordinate things when he turned himself in. Well, hopefully to go all the way and defend him in court, but they’d start with surviving surrendering himself to the police.

Things there didn’t go quite as planned, and Andy got upset and was caught on camera saying he’d defend Jon. So he’s stuck with a job—which might not be all that bad, it’d give him something to think about other than all the holiday music his wife’s about to start playing—it’s Halloween season, time for her to break out the Bing Crosby. Also, Andy believes Jon.

Jon’s accused of murdering the mayor—and gubernatorial candidate—with a sniper rifle, making an incredibly difficult shot. Sadly, one that the US Military taught him to make. That, and a whole lot of evidence, is pretty daunting for Andy and his legal team—but since when has that stopped them?

They do find a lot of evidence of other criminal activity afoot that could point to other suspects—but will it be enough? Is Andy capable of (another) Christmas miracle? And just what happens to someone who makes our genial attorney mad?

The Years are Passing

This is one of those series where very little changes—the dogs never age (thankfully); Andy, Pete, and Vince eat like college students and don’t have health issues; Edna is on the verge of retirement constantly; Sam’s senior citizen helpers are just as old as they’ve ever been, and so on.

However…Ricky is aging. Nowhere near in real-time, but it’s happening. He’s got a girlfriend, he’s taking vacations with his friends over the holidays, and even the frequently oblivious Andy is noticing it.

On the one hand, having Ricky around was a breath of fresh air back when it happened—and seeing him grow up could add some variety to things. Also, it’s hard to keep writing him out of things so he’s not in danger, or his activities aren’t a distraction from the case. Maybe aging him will allow Rosenfelt to bring him into the plots just a bit, too.

The Return of Marcus

When I talked about Dead Men Don’t Play Fetch earlier this year, I noted that Marcus was returning to his mysterious and dangerous roots after a few books where Andy and the reader learned a little more about him, got a glimpse into his personal life, and actually understood what he was saying.

This book took a major step in that direction. Andy understood a little bit of what Marcus said (although we didn’t get it in dialogue form, just described in the narration), but not most of it.

And whoo-boy, Marcus was back to his near-superhero levels of intimidation and violence. I think there was one book with more violence from him (many years back), but this has to be second place on the Marcus-as-Batman meter.

While I liked getting to know Marcus more, I like this “classic” version of him, too.

So, what did I think about Bark Humbug?

The humor in this volume seemed a little more crisp and fresh than it has lately (not that I’ve even had problems with it, but it’s felt tamer). The cultural references are more current, as well (some of them, anyway).

The courtroom action is as solid as ever—Andy keeps the judge and the prosecution on their toes. But keeps things friendly with the D.A., which is a nice touch.

Andy and his team have to do things we’re not used to them doing to get to the truth—although there are plenty of typical antics going as well.

Basically, I guess I’m saying that Bark Humbug gives the reader everything we’ve come to expect in an Andy Carpenter book, but just a little more.

This is a dose of holiday-themed fun (much to Andy’s chagrin) with a very twisty mystery on tap. This case, more than any other in a long time, challenges our team. The last few chapters are as tense as I can remember this series being—maybe not since the first dozen or so. New readers or old won’t be saying “Humbug” to this ending (or anything before then).

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from St. Martin’s Press via NetGalley—my thanks to both for this. This post contains my honest opinion about a book I chose to read.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Waiting for LeClerc by Vern Smith: Who Stakes Out the Stakeout?

Cover of Waiting for LeClerc by Vern SmithWaiting for LeClerc

by Vern Smith

DETAILS:
Publisher: Runamok Books
Publication Date: July 19, 2026
Format: Paperback
Length: 107 pg.
Read Date: September 25-26, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

Cecil eyed the yellow jacket, swinging at it, missing. “So what’re you trying to tell me?”

“That it’s time for you to take the lesson I’m teaching today.” Alex held both hands closed on his own chest, opening them to Cecil. “That it’s time for you to accept your shortcomings and learn from these teachable moments.”

“Okay, I’ll bite again.” Cecil nodded impatiently. “What today’s lesson, pards?”

“That, sometimes, things are not as we perceive.”

What’s Waiting for LeClerc About?

The detectives of Smith’s gritty Canadian noir, Scratching the Flint are back and doing their thing in this novella. Cecil and Alex are on a stakeout, sitting in a just-disguised-enough van waiting to catch a drug deal going down that’s connected to a money laundering business. I should stress upfront that it doesn’t matter if you haven’t encountered these two before—everything you need is included in the novella.

Outside the van, two customers are waiting for LeClerc, completely unaware that they’re being used. Not just by the detectives as bait for LeClerc. But they’re also being used as bait by LeClerc.

See, he’s not oblivious to what the police are doing—so with a pair of binoculars and some Radio Shack-level equipment (pretty sure he wouldn’t pay Radio Shack prices)—he’s watching and listening to the van and his customers

And well, what we have is a Beckett-level wait that will not end the way that any of the characters expect.

Grounding in the Particulars he

Scratching the Flint took place in the months leading up to 9/11, this is on the first anniversary of it. At least in part, this reflects shifting attitudes toward certain crimes, attitudes toward Police, and so on. But more than anything else, this serves to ground the works in a particular time. This isn’t a vague time-frame—it’s definite: September 11, 2002.

There are also references to two well-known drug users/addicts. One was in the news at the time, the other had a connection to one of the characters—this gives Smith the chance to use these to discuss attitudes toward the headline maker, and to tell us something about the one with the connection.

All in all—this makes everything that Smith is doing here smack of realism. Where some people would give us a vibe of early-2000s, drop a pop culture reference or two, and then keep things vague when it comes to particular people and/or would invent a celebrity name to use. Smith doesn’t give us solid, real times and people, which just adds to the atmosphere and character work.

So, what did I think about Waiting for LeClerc?

Oh, this was good. Yes, the title does tell you a lot about the plot—but not so much that you don’t want to read it. And boy, the temptation is to say more than that, but why disrupt Smith’s brilliance at work?

This might be one of the lowest-action noir works I’ve read. Pound-for-pound (as it’s a novella, it’s important to stress that), the sentences committed to action/violence/etc. are not that much more than you’d get from an Agatha Christie or Rex Stout novel. When you compare that to Scratching the Flint…Smith is practically throwing his versatility in your face.

The action that happens means something. It’s arresting. It takes you unaware and rattles you. As it should.

The dialogue is fantastic. Paragraphs could be written about every conversation, and I easily could’ve read a version of this that takes place over nine hours instead of three (although I’d have a really hard time believing LeClerc’s customers would wait that long). In discussions over books, music, religion, clothing, odors…you learn so much about these people in very few words—and more than once you’ll smile.

The other big takeaway from this is the danger in underestimating your target. And noir is always good at that.

This novella deserves more, but you have to dig into scenes, motives, and events in a way that’d ruin the impact. So, I won’t—I’ll just tell you that you’re missing out if you pass this up.

Disclaimer: I received a copy from the author—my thanks to him for it. However, this is a book I chose to read and write about, and my opinions are my own.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Quick-Take Catchups: The Leftovers from May

I’m even behind on my catch-ups…this summer really did a number on my organization. Let’s see if I can get some of it back. Again, I want to remind the reader that the point of these quick-takes posts is to catch up on my “To Write About” stack—emphasizing pithiness, not thoroughness.


Cover of The Frame-Up by Gwenda BondThe Frame-Up

by Gwenda Bond, read by Shannon McManus (Narrator)

DETAILS:
Publisher: Penguin Random House Audio Publishing Group
Publication Date: February 13, 2024
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 11 hrs., 3 min.
Read Date: May 4-6, 2026

This was a solid heist novel with just a dash of magic thrown in. Honestly, I’m not sure the magic was necessary—Bond has enough going on with the dash of romance, the family drama (increased by a “can’t go home again” story arc), and the art heist.

But throwing in the magic just kicked everything up a half a notch, if not a full notch. So I’m not complaining–I’m just trying to say that the criminal found family of it all was enough.

This is my second novel by Bond—and it’s enough to make sure that I’ll take a second look at other books by her.

Cover of The Terminal List by Jack CarrThe Terminal List

by Jack Carr, read by Ray Porter

DETAILS:
Series: The Terminal List, #1
Publisher: Simon & Schuster Audio
Publication Date: March 6, 2018
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 12 hrs., 24 min.
Read Date: May 7-11, 2026

Ugh. How did this get so popular? I’m not really that willing to spend time on talking about it. I can’t think of a single moment that I enjoyed–even Ray Porter couldn’t save it. I kept listening to see if it climbed up out of the horrible pit to make it to “extraordinarily mediocre.” Also, because I wanted to be able to tell someone that I gave it a full try.

Both are choices I regret. Cookie-cutter action from a Gary Sue super-soldier. Completely uninspired and derivative. And there are how many sequels???

Cover of The Arkadians by Lloyd AlexanderThe Arkadians

by Lloyd Alexander, read by Words Take Wing Repertory Co

DETAILS:
Publisher: Penguin Random House Audio Publishing Group
Publication Date: November 9, 2010
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 5 hrs., 49 min. 
Read Date: May 18-19, 2026

I feel disloyal to my grade-school self in giving a Lloyd Alexander book a “meh.” But this one pretty much deserved it. Alexander’s playing around with Greek myths fell pretty flat for me, I didn’t connect with the characters, the story (especially the results for each character) was predictable, and the whole thing felt written by a formula. I did find some scenes amusing and/or effective, but I doubt I’ll return to this one again and again. (I probably will give it one more chance down the road, just to be sure it wasn’t my mood)

Cover of Booked by Alison GaylinBooked

by Alison Gaylin

DETAILS:
Series: Sunny Randall, #13
Publisher: G.P. Putnam's Sons
Publication Date: May 12, 2026
Format: Hardcover
Length: 320 pg.
Read Date: May 25, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

This was entirely too quick to read–but I find that’s a thing with Gaylin’s Sunny book–she just gets in the groove and you’re rocketing through the thing. I really liked what she did with the recurring characters here, especially Blake. I’ve given up hope of a decent Richie storyline, but I didn’t mind this one. As far as the latest Malanie Joan drama–this might be my favorite use of her. The mysteries involved were pretty well executed, and I bought the way that Sunny finally uncovered the link that tied it all together. I’d seen the link (or something very much like it) coming for several chapters, but wasn’t sure Gaylin would pull off Sunny’s discovery. I think I’ve learned now to trust her. No Sunny Randall book has ever blown me away–but Gaylin makes me happy to see the series continuing and delivers a satisfying read every time.

Cover of Cultish by Amanda MontellCultish: The Language of Fanaticism

by Amanda Montel, read by Ann Marie Gideon

DETAILS:
Publisher: Harper
Publication Date: June 15, 2021
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 8 hrs., 21 min.
Read Date: May 21-26, 2026

This was truly disappointing—the subtitle made me think it would be one thing, and while the text would occasionally tip that way, it didn’t stick with it. Honestly, you should go read what Kathy @ 746 Books had to say about it. She captured my ideas better than I could.

Cover of Unread by Oliver JamesUnread:
A Memoir of Learning (and Loving) to Read on TikTok

by Oliver James

DETAILS:
Publisher: Hachette Audio
Publication Date: February 24, 2026
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 7 hrs., 10 min. 
Read Date: May 26-27, 2026
  1. James’ achievement—as well as his openness about the life experiences that got him to this point—should be celebrated. Seriously, I’m impressed and would love to sit and chat with him about it.
  2. Everyone should be upset at the education system that failed him—and almost certainly fails many others like him every year.
  3. There’s a lot to commend about this book.
  4. This is not good book. There’s too much redundancy that feels like it was included to make an arbitrary word count. The timeline is a bit muddy, and would’ve been better to follow had it been presented linearly. If it were a series of blog posts, or a book half the length, I wouldn’t have complained.
  5. To reiterate: this is a criticism of the book, not of the author, what he’s doing or how he’s doing it.

Cover of Starship Troopers by Robert A. HeinleinStarship Troopers

by Robert A. Heinlein

DETAILS:
Publisher: Ace
Publication Date: June 27, 2006
Format: Paperback
Length: 288 May 25-27, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

There’s a lot to like in this—there’s a lot to be disappointed in, too. I was pretty much in until the big battle scene. But after that? It all fell short after that. Heinlein clearly had things he wanted to say about the role of a citizen, the role of the military, war, and so on—and he used this book to say them through various mouthpieces. Sadly, most of what we got was talk, theory, just ideas, unlike similar books that put the talk into action (albeit fictional, it’s more than just haverings).

I walked away dissatisfied. I know I open myself up to ridicule, mockery, and disdain for that—but that’s how it is. Others who’ve clearly been influenced by this novel have done a better job with it (e.g., Scalzi, Hurley, Card).

Cover of After the Fall by Edward AshtonAfter the Fall

by Edward Ashton, read by John Pirhalla

DETAILS:
Publisher: Macmillan Audio
Publication Date: February 24, 2026
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 9 hrs., 56 min.
Read Date: May 28-29, 2026

Maybe because of Ashton’s reputation, I went into this with expectations that were too high. Because I felt like I should enjoy what I was hearing more than I did throughout the whole book–and there’s no reason for me to think like that. It was a solid premise, and Ashton (and Pirhalla) did a good job in executing it. But the whole time I kept thinking, “he’s about to knock my socks off in the next development/chapter/scene,” and that never happened. There’s a lot to praise here, but it never made the jump from “pretty good.” And since I came in expecting more and didn’t get it, the book felt like a letdown. I don’t think I’m being fair to the book, but…

Cover of Remington Platypus by Steve NashRemington Platypus

by Steve Nash

DETAILS:
Publisher: Northodox Press
Publication Date: July 31, 2025
Format: eBook
Length: 362 pg.
Read Date: May 28-30, 2026

I really thought I’d written a full post about this, and I’m rather annoyed to find out that it doesn’t exist.

This is a fairly-standard, but well-executed, Police novel about a grizzled detective who does what it takes to get the job done—sort of a Harry Bosch figure. Although he’s on better terms with his superior and some of his colleagues. He’s taking on a drug supplier and goes too far, resulting in him being transferred to a small town, his hometown, where he struggles to fit in—except for the few who remember him. There he encounters some crimes that lead him right back into investigating the same supplier. And things get ugly from there.

But here’s the thing—all the creatures are animals. Animals who have formed a parallel society to humans, complete with schools, police services, and drug gangs. There are some animals who haven’t taken this civilization thing to heart—and remain wild and without speech, higher thoughts. We’ve seen a lot like this before, but not like this.

Combining these two tried-and-true story types is just brilliant. You make these people instead of animals and most of the novel works just fine. You take out the crime element and just leave the inter-animal conflicts in and it’d be a pretty cool story. The mashup of the two elevates this to something else. The only comparison that jumps to mind is the comic Fables combining crime fiction and fairy tales.

Raven was raving about this last year, and it’s easy to see why. You need to check out their post.

This post contains affiliate links. If you purchase from any of them, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

20 Books of Summer 2026: Wrap-Up

20 Books of Summer banner--the text 20 books of summer and your host: AnnaBookBel above the picture of sunshine on an open book in a field of flowers
Annabel from AnnaBookBel carries on the work started by Cathy of 746 Books . You can read her kick-off post here.

Phew. By the skin of my teeth–I finished the last book of my 20 at 6pm yesterday. A month ago, I said “I should finish by the end of the month with some wiggle room.” Not a lot of wiggle room, it seems. But at least I didn’t have to stay up to midnight to finish. Even better, I’ve written about fifteen of them. I think that might be my best number in the years I’ve done this challenge–hopefully I can nail the other 5 within a week. All in all…this has been a big success. Thanks to AnnaBookBel for doing this again.

On a semi-related front, but I read six of my Top Ten Tuesday: Books on My Summer 2026 to-Read List (That Aren’t on My 20 Books Challenge) list, too. It’s not the best I could’ve done there–but I’ll take it.

This summer, my 20 were:

✔ 1. The Devils by Joe Abercrombie (My post about it)
✔ 2. Trade of Blood by Robert Jackson Bennett (My post about it)
✔ 3. Eyes of Empire by JCM Berne (My post about it)
✔ 4. Cold Iron Task by James Butcher
✔ 5. Eaters of the Dead by Michael Crichton
✔ 6. Dungeon Crawler Carl by Matt Dinniman (My post about it)
✔ 7. Detained: A boy’s journal of survival and resilience by D. Esperanza and Gerardo Iván Morales (My post about it)
✔ 8. What’s Next: A Backstage Pass to The West Wing, Its Cast and Crew, and Its Enduring Legacy of Service by Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack (My post about it)
✔ 9. Killer Vibes by Jack Friday (My post about it)
✔ 10. Manitou by Glen Gabel (My post about it)
11. Wool by Hugh Howey
✔ 12. Eternal Blades by Vlad V. Imakaev (My post about it)
✔ 13. First Mage on the Moon by Cameron Johnston (My post about it)
✔ 14. Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin
✔ 15. The Shadow Carver by Nadine Matheson (My post about it)
✔ 16. Squeaky Clean by Callum McSorley (My post about it)
✔ 17. Dial A for Aunties by Jesse Q. Sutanto (My post about it)
✔ 18. Crownfall by Michael Vadney (My post about it)
✔ 19. We Be Dragons by Michael Weitz (My post about it)
✔ 20. Everybody Wants to Rule the World Except Me by Django Wexler

How has your summer reading been? If you took part in this, how’d it go? Or if you just had a “we’ll see what comes” plan, how did that work out for you?

20 Books of Summer '26 Chart August Check-in

The Shadow Carver by Nadine Matheson: Monsters Unleashed #20BOS26

Cover of The Shadow Carver by Nadine MathesonThe Shadow Carver

by Nadine Matheson

DETAILS:
Series: DI Anjelica Henley, #4
Publisher: Hanover Square Press
Publication Date: March 10, 2026
Format: Hardcover
Length: 420 pg.
Read Date: June 27-30, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s The Shadow Carver About?

There seems to be a new serial killer active in London, with a particularly creepifying signature—they’re taking scalps as trophies. They’re also doing a pretty good job of making sure the public knows about the killings to a level the police might not be willing to provide (at least not as soon as the killer is). Oh, and the target? Criminals who seem to have gotten away with it due to court findings. There’s a certain amount of popular acclaim for the killings, because of that.

Still, even the worst of English society don’t deserve to be scalped. So DI Anjelica Henley and her team—plus a detective seconded to them—are on the hunt. One victim interacted with Henley just before dropping off the map, and she might be the last person to see them alive—which adds a level of pressure (and a conversation with other detectives about her possible connection to the case).

Throughout it all, Henley is preoccupied by another case. Despite the heinous crimes that she needs to stop, a good chunk of her mind is spinning on the death of her mentor, friend, boss, Harry Rhimes. Henley has questions about it—as does Harry’s wife, Eloise. Eloise is putting some pressure on Henley to get some answers for her—and Henley wants them for herself, too. But first, she does have to do her job.

The rest of the team is dealing with their own distractions as well—most of them are doing a better job of focusing on the work, however (which isn’t to say that Henley’s doing a bad job; she’s just not at her best). This feels like one of the truest depictions of police detectives in a procedural. Yes, they want to catch a killer—but they also want to care for their sick wives, adopt a child, hit on a colleague, or something else. It turns out, these detectives are people. Driven, but they do things other than work.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I picked this up because Nadine Matheson is one of those authors I want to stay up-to-date on, even if she steps away from this series (which I hope is a long time off). The way she gets into the mind of the criminals as well as the police is one of the things that sets her work apart from others, and I can’t get enough.

I kept at it because…well, for those reasons. Yes, I’m interested to an extent, in the case that’s distracting Henley (and will be more interested once it’s the primary focus). Yes, I’m interested in following the other team members (with an eye on Ramouter and his wife’s disease). But in this particular book it’s not just about the “whodunit?” but the “how are they going to figure it out?” This case seems twistier than normal for them on that front, and I just loved watching it.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

To be human is to seek justice. We all (or almost all), from toddlers on up, have some sort of idea of justice, rightness, fairness. And when we see it violated time and again by the processes we trust to protect it and execute justice, it makes us angry, it leads us to give up, it drives us to some sort of action.

Many times this ends in positive actions—like Henley and her team joining the police service and trying to enforce the laws. Other times it gets twisted and results in the kind of vigilantism we see here. And sometimes people who are upset and don’t know how to best react to injustice can get their minds and morality manipulated. We see examples of all three at work in this novel.

Honestly, there’s something appealing, or relatable, in each experience, and readers may be surprised at who they sympathize with at various points in the novel. (hopefully not by the end, but, you never know)

So, what did I think about The Shadow Carver?

I will admit I got a little frustrated at Henley spending as much energy (especially mental) on Rhimes, and dealing with personnel issues with a vigilante to find. And I wasn’t crazy about the way the new/temporary team member worked and interacted with the others. I think I was supposed to react that way for the latter, at least I hope so—Matheson seemed to point the reader that way.

But setting those reactions aside? This was gripping. Like I said before, the way that Matheson drives into the psychology of the characters—victims, police, perpetrators, and others—is the big draw for this series, and definitely is the case for this book.

Although, you sorta want to see what’s going on with the scalping, too.

As outlandish as much of the book seemed—it also felt incredibly grounded. These investigators come across as real people, with real concerns and motivations, and just getting to watch them is satisfying in a way that’s hard to articulate.

The Shadow Carver features a good, twisty plot, is populated with well-conceived and three-dimensional characters, and the resolution to the case is well-executed. Like always, Matheson delivers a good one.

This novel (as the others) would serve as a good jumping-on point for the series, but will reward those coming back for more well.

Either way, it’s a good ‘un.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.

20 Books of Summer 2026

Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

REPOSTING JUST CUZ: The Jigsaw Man by Nadine Matheson: A Jaw-Dropping Debut

The Jigsaw Man

The Jigsaw Man

by Nadine Matheson
Series: DI Anjelica Henley, #1

Hardcover, 388 pg.
Hanover Square Press, 2021

Read: May 17-20, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

“You never know though. This could still be a nice, straightforward investigation.”

Henley didn’t reply as she picked up her bag, because every nerve in her body told her Pellacia believed that even less than she did.

What’s The Jigsaw Man About?

Someone is killing people, dismembering them, and then scattering the parts of the bodies near the river (not necessarily in that order).

It’s DI Henley’s first day back in the field in months when these pieces are discovered. I think that qualifies as a blessing and a curse—it’s a blessing because these murders resemble the crimes of a serial killer she arrested years ago. The curse comes in because Henley is still haunted by this killer and what happened during his arrest. Stil, Peter Olivier, “the Jigsaw Killer,” is in prison—which is one of the more ironclad alibis around. The killers’ methods are so similar, there has to be a connection between the two. And there’s no one better suited to uncover that connection than Henley.

Olivier isn’t impressed with someone stealing his M.O., and he’s even less satisfied with Henley’s speed at apprehending the killer. So he decides to take care of things himself. Step one, get out of prison. Step two, find the killer—and unlike Henley, Olivier has a few suspects.

DI Anjelica Henley

The CSI team hadn’t arrived by the time Henley had left [spoiler]’s home. Anthony was en route to a shooting on the Kingsland Road, but had promised to dispatch two of his team with unrealistic promises of paid overtime. Henley could feel the anger overwhelming her as she walked back to her car. Someone had dropped the ball and no one was taking responsibility. She was doing everything that she was trained to do, to the best of her ability, but it didn’t feel as though it was enough. As if she wasn’t enough.

Henley is an all-too-familiar figure in Detective Fiction—smart, determined, driven. So much so that her husband wants her to get another job so she can spend more time with her family. But that’s not going to happen, she can’t do that. A couple of things that make her different from your typical driven, brilliant, cop that doesn’t always play well with others—Henley is a black woman DI. She has to be the best, she has to be driven and determined to survive in a position like hers. Almost everyone does a double-take as she identifies herself, someone who looks like she does is a DI?

She’s struggling with the trauma that came from the arrest of Olivier, and she appears to be losing that struggle, too. And that was before she had to deal with crimes that looked like his and interview Olivier on multiple occasions in order to try to understand the connection between Olivier and the new guy.

There’s something instantly appealing about Henlely—she’s a mess, but that doesn’t stop her. She has every reason in the world to leave the job, but she won’t for a few compelling reasons. Which actually makes her more vulnerable, watching her deal with her own issues in addition to the case makes for some really compelling reading.

The Rest of the Team

Stanford turned his back on the body. Henley knew how he was feeling. They thought they had seen it all, until life presented them with a fresh kind of hell.

As with most UK-based procedurals, there’s a great cast of characters around Hnely There are too many to really discuss the way I want to (and I don’t want to give short shrift to any). From the supervisor with complicated feelings toward her, a DS who might as well be a brother, a trainee who is in over his head (but finds a way to be valuable to the investigation), the best-friend of a medical examiner, to all those I can’t come up with a pithy phrase to describe, Matheson filled this novel with people, not two-dimensional (or one-dimensional) characters. You really can’t ask for more than that.

Peter Olivier

Unlike too many serial killers in fiction, Peter Olivier isn’t charming. He’s not some sort of misunderstood genius. The reader is never tempted to root for him as he goes up against the copy-cat or as he escapes. He’s a vile man, excellent at reading people either to attack or to convince them to become an ally.

I cannot stress enough that he’s the kind of serial killer I want to read about (and I really don’t want to read about too many of them anymore). I don’t want to sympathize with someone like that, I want it to be crystal clear that this guy is a monster, and deserves to be put away from society. Matheson gives us not just one, but two killers like that.

Questions to Wrestle With…

The best literature demands something of the reader. It often requires you to dig down deep inside and ask yourself some hard questions as you read.

The Jigsaw Man is one such book. As you read it, you have to ask yourself penetrating questions like:
bullet What’s the absolute minimum amount of sleep I need to function?
bullet Do I have to go back to work after lunch, or can I just keep reading?
bullet Will my kids be upset if I miss their soccer game/little league game/dance recital if I read throughout?
bullet Will my cats murder me in my sleep if their bowls are empty?
bullet How angry will my wife be if I ignore her for a couple of hours? (especially during the last 100 or so pages) How long will it take her to get over it?

So, what did I think about The Jigsaw Man?

I absolutely loved this. This is a dark, unsettling read—there are two pages toward the end that may be the most disturbing pages I’ve ever read. And yet…there’s something very appealing about the novel—it’s gripping and compelling, it’s also entertaining.

Henley might be a tangle of problems and issues (in addition to the positive qualities she possesses), but they’re not just there as quirks or to ground the character. There’s a reason for each of them, a story behind them, making her absolutely believable. The same could be said for the rest of the characters, too. Matheson has a real eye for character and displayed that throughout.

The pacing is perfect, and you find yourself turning the pages as fast as you can for the last 40-60 pages, because you just have to know what happens. That part of the book reminded me of the first time I read Clarice Starling walk into Buffalo Bills’ house. You’re on the edge of your seat, tense, and any little noise can startle you. It’s not often I feel like that and I love it when I do.

I definitely recommend this one to you, folks—but I should warn you, when you do, you’ll be waiting with bated breath for the next book in the series.


5 Stars
2021 Library Love Challenge

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Squeaky Clean by Callum McSorley: The Cars (or most of them) Are the Only Things Clean in This Thriller

Cover of Squeaky Clean by Callum McSorelySqueaky Clean

by Callum McSorley

DETAILS:
Series: DI Alison McCoist, #1
Publisher: Pushkin Vertigo
Publication Date: June 11, 2024
Format: Paperback
Length: 382 pg.
Read Date: June 12-13, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s Squeaky Clean About?

There are two characters that this book focuses on—although you can make the case that the number should be 4 or maybe 5, or… let’s stick with two—just for the sake of keeping this post in check.

The first is DI Alison McCoist—after a case went south in a pretty spectacular way, she’s been relegated to only the most basic of cases—things that barely call for police attention. Why? Well, she’s either horribly incompetent, or she’s corrupt. One of the two. Now, to be fair—after this, she does take a piece of evidence home with her.* But aside from that, from what we see early on, McCoist is a good detective who stumbled into some bad luck, and maybe got a little ahead of herself once.

Our other character is a guy named Davey Burnet. And it’s really hard not to feel bad for him—not nearly as bad as he feels about himself, but still. He can’t really hold a job down for long—although the job at a car wash is working out pretty well. Well, he can pay rent and the occasional toy for his young daughter (on the rare occasions he’s allowed to see her).

Okay, I lied—we need to also talk about Paul “Paulo” McGuinn. He’s a criminal into this and that—and, occasionally, a few other things. He starts frequenting the car wash and starts doing a little business with it and through it. After a really stupid move by Davey (that goes wronger than anyone could’ve expected), Davey becomes an indentured servant of sorts. This is not something he wants, and he actively looks for a way out of—I mean, he doesn’t want to become a grass. But aside from that…

Still, there’s this detective who keeps dropping by because of something else…

* And when you read about her doing it, you will kind of root for her.

The Glasgow Of It

It’s been a long time since I sounded out words as I read—aloud or in my head. But this book had me doing that constantly—sometimes I’d have to take 2-3 runs at a word before I could really hear it correctly. But somehow, this didn’t slow me down at all—in fact, it felt like it sped up my reading (I’m pretty sure I didn’t). But man, you couldn’t accidentally skim something, either—I had to pay attention to it all, just to make sure I didn’t miss something.

Here’s a little snippet to show you what I mean—I’ll have you all know, it took a bit of work to get something this long without any “adult language.”

McCoist held her ID closer and he snatched it right out of her hand—held it up to his nose. McCoist found herself going for the CS spray in her pocket, fingers gripping the small tin, palms starting to sweat.

“Detective Inspector Alison McCoist right enough.” He looked between her picture and her face like a doorman, feigned familiarity in his voice. “Good name fir a polis in Glesga.” He handed the card back. “Yer pals call ye Ally?”

“No.” Emphatic, humourless, “There’s been a report of someone squatting in this office.”

“Is it the bloke oer the hall? That web designer. He never goes hame.” He grated out a laugh.

“Could you tell me your name, sir?” McCoist got her notepad and pen, having to let go of the pepper spray.

“Bootin oot squatters is a bit below yer pay grade is it no? Fir a detective, a mean.”

“Sir. Name, please.”

“Am just tryin tae get some work done here,”

“What kind of work?”

“The honest kind. A promise.”

“Can I come in?”

” No.” He didn’t even pretend to think about it.

“I can come back with a warrant to search the premises.”

“Al huv the kettle ready when ye dae.”

(this was such a pain for me to proofread)

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I heard a couple of crime writers on a podcast—actually I think it was 3-4 people on different podcasts—talking about how much they were looking forward to the third book in this series coming out a couple of months ago. Their praise of the earlier books and excitement made me think it was worth checking out.

The Prologue was intriguing, and the first couple of chapters’ voice drew me in. By the time Davey made his critical mistake, I was hooked. And each chapter drew me in further. The combination of twisted humor; pathos; and gritty, gritty crime is executed so well, McSorley writes with the confidence of someone like Ian Rankin.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

It’s really hard to get too deep into this without talking about just about everything I shouldn’t talk about with people who haven’t read the book.

But I’m going to say the biggest commentary on humanity that this novel has to offer is about the universality of hope—and how that drives our actions. McCoist believes she can do something to earn her way out of the doghouse with her superiors and colleagues. She also hopes that she can establish a good relationship with her kids. Davey hopes he can find moderate success, straighten up his life, and get more access to his daughter—and, who knows, win her mom back, too. There are several other characters I should mention here, but again, stuff you need to read for yourself.

I guess one exception is Paulo—I don’t see hope for him at all. He’s so convinced that he’s got control of things that he doesn’t need to think about hope or anything. He just wants money and power; that’s really all he can think of. Exception that proves the rule? (probably not, but I don’t want to rethink this section too much)

So, what did I think about Squeaky Clean?

McSorley is just a fantastic writer—again, the way he balances humor, pathos, and the grittiest of crimes—mixing noir sensibilities with a bit of the absurd, and heart. It’s just fantastic.

These characters—from the several I didn’t talk about to the three I did, are all so well drawn you can imagine having conversations with them off-page. You can practically hear each voice thanks to the way McSorley does dialogue.

The way that the plot moves and turns is another example of a writer running on all cylinders—even when you think you know how the next couple of chapters—if not the whole book—is going to go. You’ll either be wrong, or so thrown by something he throws at you that you’ll get a surprise or two—and maybe start to doubt yourself. It’s really not until the last couple of pages that you can be confident in what he’s got up his sleeve. I just love that.

I really can’t think of a negative about this novel—at least not one worth talking about.

This is one of the strongest Crime Novels I’ve read this year—and will likely retain that ranking. Although I do have the sequel, and it might challenge this one. Squeaky Clean is one to check out for sure.

20 Books of Summer 2026

Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Dial A for Aunties by Jesse Q. Sutanto: Is it a Crime Comedy? Is it a Rom-Com? Is it a Family Farce?

Cover of Dial A for Aunties by Jesse Q. SutantoDial A for Aunties

by Jesse Q. Sutanto

DETAILS:
Series: Aunties, #1
Publisher: Berkley
Publication Date: April 27, 2021
Format: Paperback
Length: 320
Read Date: August 12-13
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

“Easy,” Big Aunt sniffs, shaking her head. “I don’t think it’l be that easy.”

“Why not?” Second Aunt says, raising her chin,

Big Aunt shrugs. “Because it’s never easy. Otherwise people would get away with murder all the time.”

I wince at the word “murder,” even though she said it in Mandarin. And even though I want to have faith in Second Aunt’s simple plan of “get there, find cooler, bring cooler back,” I have a feeling that Big Aunt is right. When it comes to hiding a dead body, it’s never simple—a lesson I’m quickly learning from the previous night.

What’s Dial A for Aunties About?

I feel compelled to assure you that I am not making this up—Jesse Q. Sutanto did. But as I try to summarize this, it feels like I’m just typing random words onto the screen.

Meddy Chan is a photographer for her family wedding business—one auntie does the baking, one auntie helps with makeup and hair, her mother does the floral arrangements, and another auntie is in charge of the entertainment. Meddy wanted to do other things with her photography, but being a good filial daughter, she went along with her mother and aunties when they started the business. Their biggest wedding to date is just around the corner; there’s a pair of children of billionaires getting married at a resort and the Chans are on-board.

But first, Meddy’s mother has a surprise for her. For the last few weeks, she’s been posing as Meddy on a dating site, and things with one suitor have gotten to the point for their first in-person meeting. In just a few years. Meddy doesn’t have the time (or willingness) to explain to her mother how inappropriate this all is—so she goes on the date. Fast-forward: by the end of the night, he’s dead (accidentally). In her panic, Meddy doesn’t report this to the police or anyone. She drives home with the body in the trunk. Her mother calls her sisters in to help. They come up with a hare-brained scheme to dispose of the body after the big wedding and get some sleep before the big job.

Naturally, a mix-up happens when the helpers come and pack up things like the cake to take to the resort. They include the cooler the body is hidden in. While they scamper around trying to decide how to hide and/or dispose of the body while at the resort, Meddy’s college boyfriend, the love of her life, the one who got away (and the one her mother and aunties never knew about) shows up.

And then things start to get weird with the wedding.

And then…well, that’s about enough to get you started, right?

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I got this from a Blind Date with a Book last year at some event at Shared Stories—which was fine with me, I’ve enjoyed Sutanto’s Vera Wang books, and the one YA book by her I listened to wasn’t bad. But I put it on the back burner, and it likely would’ve stayed there except I needed”a book by an author who is not from the UK or USA” for The Book Tempter’s TBR Challenge, and this was the only one that fit. So…

I kept at it because I started laughing within pages—and then you add the dead body and everything else? You have to find out where it goes. I was still laughing and chuckling up to the end (along with uttering the occasional “awwww”). Because as goofy as the above section was…it gets wackier.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

“Meddy is probably cautious because last time when you tried to set her up with Wang Zhixiang’s son, he turned out to be, you know,” Fourth Aunt says.

Ma waves an irritated hand. “Why do you keep bringing up Zhixiang’s son? So he turned out to be some maniac. How was I supposed to know?”

“Kleptomaniac,” I mumble. By the time our date was over, he’d stolen my makeup bag from my purse and, somehow, one of my shoes. I mean, the guy’s an asshole, but you’ve gotta give it to him. Or let him steal it.

In a letter to the reader before the prologue, Sutanto talks about the origin and inspiration of the book (and explains the broken English of many of the characters) and writes, “I hope that this book gives you a little peek into the fierce love with which my family raised us and protects us to this day.” To go with that, there’s a lot about the role of family in the book. Not just Meddy’s family (although that’s so pervasive you could be forgiven for not noticing any others), but Nathan’s (the college boyfriend), and the families of the bride and groom.

These families are sources of comfort, security, aggravation. There are petty rivalries between the aunties that go back decades and will never be resolved—which doesn’t alter in the slightest their devotion to each other—it just flavors it (I’m not 100% certain they even notice them). I’m sure at least one auntie realizes how insane it was for Meddy’s mother to pose as her on a dating site, but doesn’t say anything.

And whether it’s family by blood and birth, a family by choice, a found family, or…whatever. There’s something that everyone can identify with, something that everyone can see themselves in. Something we can all learn from and see humanity in. It might be easier to see it in an eccentric collection of fictional relatives than in our own—but we can then transfer that into our non-fictional families.

So, what did I think about Dial A for Aunties?

Now we know, when it comes to fight or flight, I am neither. I am: freeze like a hamster and then melt into a useless shivery puddle.

Before I get into anything else—I love Meddy’s description of groom-zillas, and how they’re a bigger problem than any supposed bride-zillas. And then this is borne out by the actual bride and groom for this particular wedding.

If you just had the long-lost love showing up at the wedding gig, the story wouldn’t have been as good. If you just had the Chans dealing with the corpse and the wedding, it would’ve been funny, but it wouldn’t carry much emotional weight. If you had the corpse and the long-lost love storylines…I’m not sure any comedy would’ve survived. But somehow when you combine the three elements with Sutanto’s gift for storytelling and comedy, it’s just magic. Madcap magic, but magic.

I’m sure there’s more to be said about the book, but I’m drawing a blank on it. It’s just… Ridiculous. Deliciously ridiculous. Ridiculously sweet. You’ve gotta read this.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.

20 Books of Summer 2026

Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Page 1 of 156

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén