Category: Authors Page 1 of 124

Reposting Just Cuz: HC Chats with Adrian M. Gibson about Jeff VanderMeer

Cover of Mushroom Blues by Adrian M. GibsonIf you’ve been on Bookish Social Medial at all in the 6+ months, I’m willing to bet you’ve seen the name Adrian Gibson or at least the cover of Mushroom Blues. You may also know him from the podcast he hosts with M.J. Kuhn, SFF Addicts. Last week, Adrian was gracious enough to struggle with StreamYard (and it was in a mood) in order that we could sit down and talk about Jeff VanderMeer–an author that I’ve been intimidated to pick up and try, but who has been instrumental in Gibson’s career. I walked away excited to try VanderMeer, and I had a good time in general. I hope you watch this and walk away thinking the same.

As I said, StreamYard wasn’t happy, so the video freezes a couple of times on both of us, but the audio is fine.

Adrian M. Gibson Links:

Twitter ~ Instagram ~ Website ~ Newsletter ~ Amazon ~ Goodreads


Are you a Reader of Things and want to chat with me about an author/series/something other than promoting your own work (which we will do, just not primarily)? I’d love to keep trying this, but I’m not ready to start pestering people about it. So please let me know.

Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Deadly Does It by Abbi Waxman: When Fear Conspires With Pride

Cover of Deadly Does It by Abbi WaxmanDeadly Does It

by Abbi Waxman

DETAILS:
Series: A Mason and Mann Mystery, #2
Publisher: Berkley
Publication Date: July 21, 2026
Format: Paperback
Length: 364 pg.
Read Date: August 5-7, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

“Prison’s very dull, apart from the all-pervading fear of violence and the occasional bug in the food. Trust me, you’d hate it, not because it’s scary, but because it’s skull-crushingly boring.”

“I have no intention of going to jail.”

Julia laughed. “No one intends to go to jail, Mason, yet there they are.”

What’s Deadly Does It About?

It’s been six months or so since Mason has gone to work as an investigator/assistant to ex-actress turned activist lawyer Julia Mann. They’ve taken some cases to make money, and keep some room handy to take con cases to help people they like (and/or hurt those they don’t).

It’s the latter that comes into play when Mason’s sponsor reveals she’s been getting threatening notes, and someone seems to be following through with them—Alexa is an event planner and two of her recent events have gone spectacularly, headline-makingly bad. The threats promise to do more than just ruin her reputation soon. Julia and Mason assume it has to do with Alexa’s past—back decades ago when she was drinking, doing drugs, and some minor crimes—and was associated with people who were doing some more serious crimes. So they start looking into the past she’s tried to put behind her to uncover who’s trying to make her present unlivable.

Meanwhile, Mason’s father had a minor heart attack and she has to visit home a couple of times, connecting with her semi-estranged family. Also, Julia teams her up with a P.I.* to get some actual training rather than just fumbling around has she has been—it forces Mason to think about her future in a way that I’m not sure she’s done since she got sober, in addition to giving her some tools she needs for this case.

* The similarity between this P.I. (Teddy) and Peter Key’s mentor from Killer Vibes are pretty strong, but Teddy seems like a better guy to hang out. I’m curious if I’ll think the same after one more book featuring each.

Recovery

This book, more than One Death at a Time and similarly to the Assassins Anonymous books, is a tribute to AA and similar programs. Many things—many things near and dear to the characters—will be mocked by characters in the book—but not their sobriety and recovery. Characters will talk about getting to a meeting, their need for one, talks with their sponsor, etc.—and the investigation will stop for them to do so.

There’s even a clear need and justification to investigate people at a certain meeting, and discussion about it is shutdown by Julia so quickly it’ll make your head spin. She might get pushed to it by circumstances, she makes it clear—but it’s going to take a lot for her to go there and things never got there.

Due to the nature of the investigation, almost everyone they talk to is an addict in recovery or has been avoiding it for decades. Either way, Julia and Mason can relate to them, sympathize and empathize with them. This adds a different flavor to their interviews/conversations than you get in most P.I. novels. It endeared me to them even more than I already was.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

Because Abbi Waxman has been an auto-read for me since 2019 and because the fist book in this series was so good that any future books in it would’ve been a reflex pick up as well.

The short version of why I kept reading it is that I have more fun with it than its predecessor. The longer version is that when it comes to heart, humor, convincing mystery, believable characters, and compelling story-telling—this book nailed it all.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

This book is about the capacity for change, and how that capacity (exercised or not) is something we all possess. It may be major changes—like working the 12 Steps—or something relatively minor—like Julia’s cook realizing she’s a cat person and starting to pamper Mason’s cat with cooking better than many people ever get.

Mason’s father has to make some changes due to his health, Mason’s sister and Mother need to acknowledge that Mason’s made some positive changes in her life (whether they do or not, I won’t say). Mason has to make some decisions about changing her life. Many of the characters in this book have made significant lifestyle changes due to substance abuse and addiction. There might even be a couple who haven’t made the changes they need to which creates the mayhem our duo takes on.

Regardless, the opportunity is there for the taking, the possibility is there.

So, what did I think about Deadly Does It?

“I think I can still write by hand, but on the few occasions I have to, it looks like a centipede has done two lines of coke, stepped in a tiny pot of ink and scrambled across the page in a hurry to get to somewhere else. Not exactly legible.”

There was a pause.

“Thanks for the colorful image, Mason,” said Julia, “no sure who would sell a centipede the minuscule amount o¢ drugs they could take, but your rich and vivid imagination will eventually come in handy, I expect.”

The interaction between Julia and Mason—and between Julia’s employees/friends/odd family—is the heart of this novel, in terms of character growth, the plot, and for entertainment. Most of the laughs come from them interacting with each other. It’s in this that the link between Waxman’s earlier novels and this series can be seen.

But the mystery and the investigative work are no slouch. As with One Death at a Time, Waxman shows she knows away around this kind of story. Yes, I was yelling at them (rightly) to pay attention to one character far earlier than they did, and I cottoned on to the motivation to the notes before they did—but it’s only because Waxman laid out the clues so clearly for the reader.

I like these characters—including the new ones and the new layers we saw in our old friends—I thought the main story was really well executed. I think Waxman could’ve done a little more with the arc about Mason’s family, but what was there was great. And the set up for future books is clear and I look forward to seeing what she does with the seeds she planted.

This would work wonderfully as a jumping-on point for the series, but it might resonate a little better with the reader if they go back to the beginning (which isn’t that far)—but either way if you’re looking for a mystery novel with dazzling characters, some genuine humor. great dialogue, and plenty to chew on, Deadly Does It fits the bill.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

REPOSTING JUST CUZ: One Death at a Time by Abbi Waxman: You’ll Laugh All the Way to the Morgue

(not that you actually go to a morgue in this book, I was just struggling with that headline)


Cover of One Death at a Time by Abbi WaxmanOne Death at a Time

by Abbi Waxman

DETAILS:
Series: A Mason and Mann Mystery, #1
Publisher: Berkley
Publication Date: April 15, 2025
Format: eARC
Length: 400 pg.
Read Date: April 11-15, 2025
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s One Death at a Time About?

Natasha Mason is a twenty-something still trying to figure out what to do with her life—her alcoholism led to her leaving law school, and now she’s paying bills by delivering food and doing other gig economy standbys in L.A., and making sure she makes at least one meeting a day.

At one of these meetings, a vaguely familiar-looking woman shows up—and is not the friendliest of people. She seems—well, is—more concerned about getting her court-mandated signature than in anything else. Mason volunteers to be this woman’s interim sponsor. Now this older woman had been sober before, but on the night that led to the court-mandated meetings had a blood-alcohol level that stunned a rowdy twelve-step meeting into silence. She’d also come out of a blackout next to the dead body of a former lover/decades-long antagonist and what was probably the murder weapon. For a night she couldn’t remember—it’d clearly been eventful.

The next morning, Mason shows up at the gate of her obviously well-off sponsee. Thanks to some time on the internet, Mason knows her to be Julia Mann—a former box office star, now a lawyer taking on cases for as many Davids as she can in a city of Goliaths. Oh, and in between careers, she’d been in prison due to the death of her husband—the former business partner of the dead man she’s currently suspected of killing.

This meeting didn’t go the way Mason suspected—for one, Julia Mann’s housekeeper is an amazing cook, as Mason learned. Also, the two kept butting heads—Mason wanted to talk about Julia’s sobriety, but Julia was rather fixated on the murder. And yet…something clicked between the two. In between verbal jousts,* Julia ends up hiring Mason to be her personal assistant and help with the investigation. Mason justifies this to herself as a way to stay near Julia and keep her sober. The chance to eat more of Claudia’s cooking and make more money than an app can pay doesn’t hurt.**

Before you know it, these two have got themselves involved in a separate murder investigation (another David for Juila to work for), arson, tensions around Julia’s former career in the film industry, tensions around Julia’s future career in the film industry (she wants none of it, but no one seems to care), brushes with organized crime, multiple reasons for both or either of them to ditch their sobriety, and more things that I can fit into this rambling sentence.

* The back-and-forth between these two is reason enough to try this book. Waxman will supply several others, it should be noted.
** Yes, this makes two books in as many months about an LA-based delivery driver turning amateur investigator.

The Murder Mystery(ies)

Murder mysteries surrounding the film industry tend to have a few things in common—secrets, petty grievances that get nurtured into full-blown rivalries (or worse), scandals (for an industry reputed to be filled with amoral hedonists, there really are a lot of moral scandals), and organized crime.

One Death at a Time ticks all of these boxes—and a few others that I should’ve listed above, but forgot to. This may be Waxman’s first mystery, but she clearly understands the genre and knows how to construct a classic whodunit in a contemporary setting.

You get all the twists, turns, red herrings, and layers upon layers of competing motives for multiple suspects that you need—doled out in just the right pacing with dollops of shocks and action along the way. The final reveal is satisfying, and every loose plotline is tied up. It’s a textbook example of the genre—pleasing in every way.

The Humor/Tone/Relationships

This might be a clumsy way to tackle these ideas, but it’s where I am.

Yes, Waxman is known for Rom Coms—or Rom Com-adjacent—books, so we all know she’s funny. This seemed to me to be more overtly comedic. There are jokes—many of them—not just funny situations and loveable, quirky characters doing goofy things. Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of those (as well as non-lovable, quirky characters).

This reads like Dave Barry’s kind of crime novel, with the restraint of a Richard Osman. The verbal jousting is great, and the physical comedy is almost as good. The situations are frequently ridiculous, but never so much so that you get taken out of the moment.

The technical term that best describes Mason is “wiseass,” and one with poor impulse control. Someone who doesn’t know how to keep her trap shut, powered by Waxman’s wit is a fun character to read. Julia’s no slouch in that department either, but she’s more mature, she knows that she should pick her targets with care—and is therefore usually more effective.

The rest of Julia’s team (I will not tell you about them, so you can meet them properly) and some of the other characters the reader encounters have drier wits, largely fitting into the typical Waxman model. Oh, except this one actress…nope. You wouldn’t believe me if I tried to describe her.

Mason’s support system consists of the meetings she attends, her sponsor, and her cat. Julia has a strong team of employees and friends (the Venn diagram there has a large area of overlap)—they’re just not that effective on the sobriety front, but they make up for that with their loyalty. Julia also has a pretty strong network of former friends, employers, and employees in and around the film industry. These are loyal to their grudges against her and their own self-interest—however, they (or at least most of them) want her to succeed in her search for the killer, so they can move on with their lives and careers.

You combine all of this—with a (slowly) growing relationship of affection, trust, and appreciation between our protagonists—and you’ve got yourself a great basis for comedy with heart.

Sobriety

One thing that Waxman never made light of in all of this was the sobriety of the characters. Yes, Julia would mock Mason’s approach to being her sponsor, but that was about the characters’ personality differences—both of them took it seriously.

Not all of the characters appreciated the struggle and what the characters did to preserve it—but none of the comedy was about the drinking.

The opening meeting did get me to chuckle frequently, but that was character-based humor. The book never gets preachy at the reader, just to each other.

So, what did I think about One Death at a Time?

I had a blast with this—if you couldn’t tell. This is my fifth Waxman novel, so I went into it expecting that I would. I just wasn’t sure how much I’d enjoy it, because of the genre. But if I didn’t know who she was before I picked this up, I’d be scouring the library for her Abbi Waxman now.

It does—as it should—feel very different than her previous works. I’d say this is closer to last year’s Christa Comes Out of Her Shell than the rest, but even saying that, this is different. The stakes are (obviously) higher for these characters; there are potentially lethal consequences for failure. Which might explain the more heavy-handed approach to the comedy.

I think I’ve said everything I wanted to above—the mystery part is really well done; the characters are well-designed and well-excecuted, the relationships between them are strong and obvious—you like the people you’re supposed to like enough that you wish you sat around the room with them, watching them go back and forth while eating whatever wonderful treat/meal Claudia has prepared. Also, it’s funny. That’s a one-two-three combination that I’ll always enjoy and recommend.

This feels like a standalone, but it could easily spawn a sequel or more. If it does, I’ll be first in line. If it doesn’t…well, that’s okay, too. It works really well either way.

Basically, reader, if any of the above tickles your fancy—you need to add this to your TBR. I practically guarantee you’ll have a great time.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from Berkley Publishing Group via NetGalley in exchange for this post, which contains my honest opinion—thanks to both for this.


5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Eyes of Empire by JCM Berne: Failing the Heck Out of His Whole Noninterference Plan (and others, too)

Cover of Eyes of Empire by JCM BerneEyes of Empire

by JCM Berne

DETAILS:
Series: Hybrid Helix, Turn 5
Publisher: The Gnost House
Publication Date: September 3, 2024
Format: Hardcover
Length: 399 pg.
Read Date: July 1-4, 2026

The native’s body was humanoid, but its head was catlike. Something like a tiger. Or a lion. Whiskers; eyes with black pupils and sclera of gold; white fur around the muzzle; long, sharp teeth. Definitely a carnivore.

Tiger? Lion? Liger? I’m fighting a liger-headed alien. My mother warned me I’d have days like this. Don’t leave Earth, she said. You’ll end up fighting liger-headed aliens on distant planets where they don’t even have breathable air or working toilets.

What’s Eyes of Empire About?

I feel very much like our friend Inigo: “Let me explain… No, there is too much. Let me sum up.” How Berne fit all this in to 399 pages without it feeling rushed or anything, I don’t know.
bulletThe station Repentant is acting stranger than usual…and that’s not good.
bullet The il’Drach Empire has wiped out most of the population of a planet—the refugees are on their way to Wistful, who doesn’t have enough room for them all—and some are in a very medically fragile state.
bullet While Ben and Marion try to deal with the immediate problems (keeping them alive), Rohan needs to find a place for them to live in the long-term
bullet Hyperion is mixed up in the wiping out of the planet, and Rohan just might have to do something about that.
bullet The il’Drach are checking to see if they need to do any more clean-up work in the area related to Hyperion.
bullet The Hybrid that decided to stick around on Wistful is having a hard time acclimating.
bullet Another wormhole opened up to another system with a couple of very funky planets. One of which supports life, and Rohan goes off to make first contact.
bullet That first contact is with a feline-human race, and first contact could’ve gone better. Which leads to Rohan having someone else to help acclimate to life on Wistful (and among more species than she believed existed in the universe)

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

“The bad news, however, is about as bad as you could possibly imagine.”

“What? That’s impossible, I have a powerful imagination. It’s not as if you contaminated their culture and doomed the planet, right?”

Rohan shrugged.

Wei Li’s eyes widened. “Oh my.”

Ben frowned. “Really?”

Ang’s jaw dropped. “My Katya-le’s people?”

Rohan sighed. “I’m going to fix things. I will.

“I’m just not sure how.”

I picked it up because it’s a Hybrid Helix novel. I love these things. Yes, it took me too long to get back to it, because I was enforcing my “no moving on until you write about the previous book” rule—and I kept putting that one off. Now that I’ve read this, I’ve got the next book slotted for September (unless my August isn’t as crazy as I think it’ll be).

I kept reading for two reasons: 1. It’s a Hybrid Helix novel. I love these things. 2. What Berne is doing with Rohan in these pages—and setting him up to do for the next arc of the series—is fascinating. Also, the new characters/species/planets are so cool that I wanted to learn more about them. Lastly, I really enjoyed what Berne’s doing with our established secondary characters in general and how he’s mixing the new characters in with them.

Vaguely Spoiler-y Section Ahead, Feel Free to Skip to Next Section

Rohan Realizes That He’s Not John Rambo

(I’m referring the movie version, not the book version. Although, he’s clearly not that, either)

I just wanted a quiet life. Tow ships, drink tequila. Maybe find a girlfriend. Now people are trusting in me. Counting on me.

In every First Blood movie sequel, the beginning is the same—John Rambo has found somewhere quiet, away from society, where he can meditate, do some simple tasks as work, and live at peace. Something interrupts that (frequently, but not always, related to Col. Trautman) and he has to go shoot, stab, and manhandle whoever this particular movie’s enemy are.

This is really Rohan’s goal when we meet him, and it looks like it’s working (well, except for that in medias res opening to Wistful Ascending). And it’s continually his goal throughout the series. But things keep happening to interrupt that: a wormhole opens up and drops a new race on his doorstep and he has to work to keep them safe; giant monsters are coming out of the ocean to wreak havoc and destruction and he has to go help out; a nasty space vampire is running amok on Wistful and he needs to stop it; etc. It’s not quite as explodey as (and quite a bit more articulate than) Rambo’s adventures, but the outline is similar.

Each time Rohan intervenes, he takes on more and more responsibility for those around him. Unlike Rambo, who just leaves everyone else behind to get away from the world. Okay, I’m done talking about Rambo, let’s focus on Rohan.

At the same time, Rohan’s doing things to improve his power, to gain a better handle on it, so that he doesn’t have to tap into his anger (that will then be hard to control), to use it in combat-like situations.

He’s presented in this book with an opportunity—if not a responsibility—to choose another way. A way that means he won’t only be a tow-chief anymore. That he’ll embrace greater responsibility in the systems around Wistful (and connected to them by wormhole).

This really marks a step forward for the series and will set our Hybrid in a new direction for a while.

So, what did I think about Eyes of Empire?

Dr. Simivar poked at one of his still-open wounds. “Ouch.”

“Another hour in the tank and you’ll be ready to get dressed and walk around. If you can, try to avoid any significant exertion for another eight hours. Let someone else do the fighting for a while.”

“I’ll try. How will I know if I moved around too much, or too soon?”

She shrugged. “Check your feet.”

“My feet?”

“Yes. If there are puddles of blood gathering around them, you’ve done too much. Come back and we’ll get you stitched back together.”

While reading this, I remembered that I was close to the end of the first arc of the Hybrid Helix—but I wasn’t sure if that was this book or the next (and why bother looking that up when I could just keep reading?). In the last few chapters (maybe 50-100 pages) it sure felt like a conclusion of sorts was on the horizon, and even better—it felt earned, deserved, and organic. This isn’t a case of Berne deciding to change things up and forcing it on the series. Berne says this has been his plan all along, but Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof have rendered me incapable of trusting writers when they say things like that.

Anyway, it was a very satisfying way to take this book and series—I’m looking forward to seeing what the next arc looks like.

This is filled with all the trademark Berne flourishes—great action, great banter, interesting musical recommendations, crazy new alien creatures. Sure, the “cat people” are not that revolutionary—but their culture is (and Rohan’s misunderstanding of it was pretty amusing). And the fauna on their planet…ugh. I want to talk about it, but I don’t want to ruin anyone’s exposure to it. But they could be my favorite thing introduced in this series since we met the Ursans. I’ve been talking about the bigger arcs, and deeper things going on in the series for most of this post, but I shouldn’t neglect to say that this is just a fun read. Whatever else Berne does, that is preeminent in his books.

We also meet a disturbing new representative of the il’Drach Empire. Each time I think the Empire is as distasteful and horrible as it can be, Berne finds a new and interesting way to prove that I’m wrong. Okay, okay, they have their whole “for the greater good” justification—or really, “the lesser of two evils” justification. But, I’m not entirely certain that I buy it. I’m thinking there has to be a better way. Another way. I expect that within the next 17 books, we’re going to find out what that way is.

Really, there’s no reason (unless you’re following stupid self-imposed rules) to not grab this book if you’re into super-hero fiction, space opera, witty dialogue (internal or otherwise), and/or good fun.

Self-Published Authors Appreciation Week circle logo and the Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow in front of an open book
20 Books of Summer 2026

Image by OpenIcons from Pixabay
The 2026 Self-Published Authors Appreciation Week Logo was made by Witty and Sarcastic Book Club

True Romance: A Noir Anthology edited by Troy Lambert & Vincent Zandri: Love is What Makes Life Worth Living. Or is it?

Cover of True Romance edited by Troy Lambert & Vincent ZandriTrue Romance

edited by Troy Lambert & Vincent Zandri

DETAILS:
Publication Date: May 15, 2026
Format: e-Book
Length: 286 pg.
Read Date: July 1-17, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

You’ll also meet deep characters in dark places and maybe learn that love isn’t always all it’s cracked up to be. Or maybe it is…

What’s True Romance About?

Part of the blurb reads:

From quiet suburban rot to organized crime empires, from calculated seduction to explosive violence, these stories explore the dangerous intersection where love and darkness meet.

Because in noir, love isn’t salvation. It’s motive.

I wish I’d written that, because it’s such a great way to summarize this collection of noir short stories from some of the best I’ve read—like Reed Farrel Coleman and Paul D. Brazill; authors I’ve meant to read, like Frank Zafiro; to a bunch of people I’ve never heard of, but want to hear of again.

Each of these stories approaches the themes of darkness, love, lust, and romance in a different way. But all of them tell us something about the human condition—what we want it to be like, and what it really is.

So, what did I think about True Romance?

Part of me wants to take issue with the title for this—there’s very little Romance to be found here, not much love either. And sure, you can say, “well, that’s because it’s noir, HC.” And there’s a lot to be said for that. But it can be done. Know Me from Smoke by Matt Phillips is the only example I can come up with off the top of my head (which is embarrassing). Sure, it’s tricky—but it can be done.

Sadly, not by most of these authors. Paul D. Brazill’s “Red Esperanto” (which is just a cool title) probably has the best depiction of love (along with a hefty dose of lust, crime, and lying). Samantha Ripley probably comes closest to romance in “Killing in the Name Of” (but there’s a lot of violence, mayhem, and quips before that).

Most of the stories are about lust, love twisted into something else, love that’s very lost, or something else. This doesn’t mean they’re bad, they’re just not romantic. (eh, one exception—but every anthology has to have one. And each reader will pick a different one to qualify). Scott Kikkawa’s “The Buyout” is a fantastic story, but the love there…eh, I’m not sure it qualifies as romantic.

I’ve spent more words on that than I figured I would—whoops. And I still feel like I could go on—but I won’t. The writing is crisp and snappy. The stories are just twisted and noir enough to stick in your minds longer than they might otherwise. Some of these are real gems. Charles Salzberg’s “All for the Love” is written in the Second Person—which is normally a deal-breaker for me, but I didn’t really notice it until the penultimate paragraph—that’s an achievement. Zafiro’s “Ask Me Tomorrow” was just delicious.

I think I could do an entire post about Lawrence Kelter’s “Midnight Confession.” It caught me by surprise more than once.

Before I dig into each story—and I’m close to doing that, but I don’t think it’d serve the collection for me to do so—just know that this is a great anthology with some very strong stories, some decent ones, and a couple that got a “meh” out of me. Which, really, is all I’m looking for in a collection—even those that don’t really have a theme. So it really doesn’t bother me too much that this one doesn’t stick to the theme in the way I’d like it to (your results may vary, and probably will).

I’m so glad I read this and I encourage those who like a good crime fiction short story—particularly with a noir flavor—to check this out. You’ll be happy you did.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.

Self-Published Authors Appreciation Week circle logo and the Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow in front of an open book
Literary Locals logo

Image by OpenIcons from Pixabay
The 2026 Self-Published Authors Appreciation Week Logo was made by Witty and Sarcastic Book Club

Dead Men Don’t Play Fetch by David Rosenfelt: Recovery Programs, Dog Shelters, and Murder—It’s Right Up Andy Carpenter’s Alley

Cover of Dead Men Don't Play Fetch by David RosenfeltDead Men Don’t Play Fetch

by David Rosenfelt

DETAILS:
Series: Andy Carpenter, #32
Publisher: Minotaur Books
Publication Date: July 7, 2026
Format: eARC
Length: 288 pg.
Read Date: June 26, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s Dead Men Don’t Play Fetch About?

Andy gets called by an old acquaintance—one he feels indebted to. Lou Campanelli runs a rehab center, and one of the homeless gentlemen served there has been arrested for the murder of an eccentric billionaire. He’s in need of a defense attorney.

He’s also in need of someone to care for his dog.

Both of which are Andy Carpenter specialties.

Andy and his team come to a quick conclusion about their client’s innocence. But figuring out a defense for him…well, that’s going to take some work.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I picked this up because after 31 books in the series, how do I not? Okay, I guess I have abandoned some series in the 20s. But those haven’t kept things as fresh, kept changing things (while not changing too much).

The banter between Andy and the other characters still works. Andy’s changing ideas about his work (earlier in the series he was just trying to do as little as possible, now he’s shifted to trying to retire. It’s a subtle difference, but it’s there). We’re getting to know some of these characters in new ways—even as the cast grows a little.

And the mysteries are still clever and the courtroom material never gets old.

What’s the Same? What’s Different?

As I alluded to above, to keep a series this long-running you have to balance changing things and keeping things the same to satisfy long-time fans without letting them tire of things.

Here’s a quick list of things that came to mind:
Marcus is a little more mysterious and dangerous than he’s been in the last few books. In fact, he might be his most dangerous here. He also makes a huge blunder—I’m not used to seeing that from him. I’m also not sure how it served the story. I need to think on this some more.

Sam and his hacking are reliable as ever—I’m glad that some of Andy’s crew are still uncomfortable with the legality of it, even if some of the others have given up caring.

Andy’s uneasy relationship with both the FBI and various organized crime groups continue—I wonder a little about the lengths he goes to with the latter in this book. How far is too far—and how long will he continue in the good graces of some of these mobsters?

We got very little of Edna this go-around, but the jokes made about her worked. Eddie Dowd was practically a non-entity as well. Which is a shame, he should be around for more than some of the behind-the-scenes legal work.

Not only do we have a good amount of action for the Tara Foundation here—which is always good to see—there’s discussion about the establishment of another dog rescue in town—and this one will be a nationwide chain. Rosenfelt obviously cares a lot for this kind of work, and it’s a pleasure to see him get the chance to dwell on it.

So, what did I think about Dead Men Don’t Play Fetch?

I really enjoyed this one—and really had a hard time stopping when I needed to go back to work after lunch—I’d have been much more content to finish the book then and there. Everything was firing on all cylinders for this book and It was just a pleasure to read.

Well…almost all cylinders were firing. There was a moment semi-early-on when one of the characters says something that didn’t make a lot of sense to me (I’m trying to be obscure here). After going back to check what had been said earlier with what this character said, it really seemed like a misstatement. Maybe Rosenfelt goofed and no editor picked it up. Or maybe because I had an ARC that it would be something to be fixed before the book hit the shelves.

But no. It was a clue. A very intentional thing by Rosenfelt. And boy, I felt sheepish. I really thought I was eagle-eyed by catching that. And, maybe I was. But I was so wrong in my understanding of it. Once I saw it as a clue (and no, I won’t tell you how far I was in the book before I realized that*), I really appreciated the way that Rosenfelt worked it in like he did. Even if the realization that I wasn’t so clever as I thought I was when the character goofed still smarted.

I guess everything was firing on all cylinders, but me.

It’s a clever mystery, perpetrated by believable people, with high stakes for all involved. The characters are fun and engaging. There’s really nothing more to ask for.

If Rosenfelt keeps going like this, I’m in for as many books as he cares to write. This would make a fine jumping-on point for those who like a good legal thriller (on the light side). It also works well for people who read some of the earlier books, but didn’t keep up. You’ll be fine jumping back in.

I encourage you all to do so.

* Very.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from St. Martin’s Press via NetGalley in exchange for this post which contains my honest opinion—thanks to both for this.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

The Brothers McKay by Craig Johnson: A Contemporary Take on a Classic Murder—and Walt Gets a New Pet?

Cover of The Brothers McKay by Craig JohnsonThe Brothers McKay

by Craig Johnson

DETAILS:
Series: Walt Longmire, #22
Publisher: Viking
Publication Date: May 26, 2026
Format: Hardcover
Length: 349 pg.
Read Date: June 8-9, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

It wasn’t so much of a surprise that Pepper McKay was dead as much as it was an amazement to everyone in the county that it had taken so long for him to die, or for somebody to kill him.

What’s The Brothers McKay About?

That’s the opening paragraph of the book—and we keep getting reminded of this point. A chapter or so later, Walt is interviewing a witness:

“Have Pepper and Manx been having any difficulties lately?”

“Lately?” She laughed and then covered her mouth with a hand as if to capture the sound. “You mean beyond the last twenty-two years?”

“Manx didn’t seem very torn up about Pepper’s passing.”

“Do you honestly think anybody in the county will be?”

That won’t be the last time the sentiment is echoed.

Pepper has three (legitimate) sons, and one known illegitimate son. And more enemies—or at least people who actively disliked him—than the population of Absaroka County. At least it seems that way.

Walt Longmire happens to be one of them (but not a suspect). But that’s how much this man is disliked. I really can’t understand how he was able to convince the mothers of his children to sleep with him, but he seems to have plenty more lovers, too. I’m really not sure Johnson established that to my satisfaction (one of two problems I have with this book, so take it with a grain of salt).

Soon, he, Vic, and Double-Tough find themselves with too many suspects—including all of the man’s (known) children—and at least one monk! Motives range from revenge to greed to jealousy. And there are multiple suspects for each motive, too.

It’s noticed by several people that the murders—oh yeah, there are multiple killings (eventually)—resemble a certain Russian classic. But I’ll talk about that in a minute.

Chekov’s Wildfires

One of Johnson’s—and the series’—strengths is highlighting the stark beauty of Wyoming, the nature around Absaroka County, the wide stretches of uninhabited land, and the forces of nature. We’re really used to seeing storms wreak havoc on Walt and the rest of his Department.

This time, it’s fire.

We learn early on about a couple of fires that are being fought near—but not too-near—the crime scene. Now, everyone who’s watched TV or read more than one book reads about them and knows that before the end of the book, at least one of those fires is going to play a role. This is made even clearer by Walt getting regular updates about them getting closer.

Sticking with one of themes of this book, let’s borrow an idea from Russian literature and call them Chekov’s wildfires.

Johnson brings those fires to life in much the same way he has done with blizzards—but the danger seems (and probably is) greater for Walt and those with him. It’s an extended part of the book—a lot longer than I expected it to be. But once the flames started nipping at their heels, it engulfed my attention and wouldn’t let go. It was some really exciting material.

The Brothers Karamazov

Now, what I know about Russian literature couldn’t fill up a decent blog post. When it comes to [author’s] The Brothers Karamazov, my knowledge is even more limited.

It was expanded a lot by this book—both in what I can tell were parallels Johnson was drawing, and what Walt and Sidorov mused about it.

From what I gather, people better read than I can probably easily see what Johnson was doing there and appreciate it. Not unlike Walt’s version of the Inferno back in Hell is Empty.

I also have to say, learning that The Brothers Karamazov is volume 1 of an unfinished trilogy pretty much guarantees I’m never going to get around for it. People complain about Martin and Rothfuss, but 146 years is far too long to wait for a sequel. Where are the songs and memes about Dostoevsky?

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I grabbed this reflexively because it was a new Walt Longmire novel.

I stuck with it because you just don’t walk away from Walt. But more importantly, because it worked in so many ways that you really didn’t notice you’d been reading for a while—all you know is that you’re in the middle of a puzzle for Walt and you’re having a good time. I’m really not sure how aware I was of anything else.

So, what did I think about The Brothers McKay?

She studied me. “What’s the matter?”

I slumped back on the bench, taking off my hat and staring up at the delicate design of the pressed-tin ceiling. “It’s all just so abstract, stupid, and petty.”

Vic glanced at Henry and Sidorov, and then back at me before making her way over to the mini fridge and pulling out four cans of Rainier. Sauntering over, she popped the top of one and handed it to me. “How long have you been in law enforcement?”

“Most of my life, but I keep hoping that our species will evolve.”

“Yeah, good luck with that.”

This is the best Longmire in a while. The interplay with the characters, the complexity of the case, the characters that were created just for this book—and the little glimpse we got into Walt’s younger years…and a few other things I can’t think of at the moment, really elevate this to one of the best in the series. I don’t think Johnson’s written a bad novel, but some are clearly better than others. This falls into the “better” column.

As usual, I really enjoyed Vic in this book. As usual, I wanted more of her—but what we got was great. Henry didn’t show up in this as much as he could’ve—and that worked for the best. And we got some good time with Double-Tough—it has been far too long since he graced the pages of this series.

What I said above about Chekov’s wildfires started off as a line or two here…but I won’t repeat myself. The other bit of nature that worked really well in this book was a mule. Johnson did a good job in making you care as much about the mule as he did many of the humans.

Oh, and we shouldn’t forget Walt’s dry wit, Vic’s less subtle humor, and Walt’s deep font of trivia. Who knew you’d get the history of a boardgame in the book?

Johnson really brought Sidorov (the Russian that’s been lurking around Walt lately) into the spotlight for both this novel and to set up the next one (at least). When we got his first big update about Ruth One Heart, the writing was on the wall for Walt’s future, sadly. I’m not crazy about: a. the set-up for the next novel—as much as I figured something like it was going to happen; b. the way that Johnson set it up—as well as it was executed. I’ll save my complaints for the next book (hopefully after Johnson changed my mind).

But that’s for 2027, for now? I can focus on what a great book this was.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

The Photonic Effect by Mike Chen: Chen’s Most Out-of-This-World Novel Yet

Cover of The Photonic Effect by Mike ChenThe Photonic Effect

by Mike Chen

DETAILS:
Publisher: S&S/Saga Press
Publication Date: April 21, 2026
Format: Paperback
Length: 431 pg.
Read Date: May 19-23, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s The Photonic Effect About?

The Horizon is a science/exploratory vessel that was stuck out in deep space for a decade. Many adventures were had, new crew members were added, challenges faced. Think the U.S.S. Voyager. When they come home, they find that The Cluster (think Federation) has broken into Civil War. Members of the crew by family, origin planet, or perspective belong on both sides of the conflict.

But peace pretty much reigns on the ship (while strained) while they’re able to focus on their mission–an experimental drive. But their fleet commanders are dragging the Horizon into the conflict–and things start going wrong there.

On every level–levels that her captain, Demora Kim, probably wasn’t aware of. While Kim tries to keep her crew together, keep her command, and keep Horizon from having to fire a shot–some important allies the ship made while being stranded send a distress call.

If Kim can’t find a way to help–the destruction that follows could be devastating to their ally, the Horizon, and both sides of The Cluster’s War.

An Atypical Chen Novel

I’ve said this before—and Chen has talked about it frequently. Basically, Chen’s novels are only technically genre tomes. You have a love story, a story about fatherhood, relationships between siblings, family, etc.—and then he injects some SF or other genre elements into them.

This is straight-SF. Chen lets his geek run free here. Yes, there’s a lot of heart, he has a lot to say about romantic love, found family, loyalty, duty, and whatnot.

And it’s utterly fascinating—Chen puts us right in the middle of a saga. It almost feels like this should be book two or three of a series, and the reader has to play catch up with the history of the ship and its crew. The previous books* would be action-packed and full of great concepts. Getting thrown in like this was a great setup—we have to focus on this aftermath-type of story.

* I feel like I need to stress that these don’t exist. They’re purely theoretical previous books.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

Chen’s been an auto-pick-up for me for years. And I’ve never seen a reason to depart from that.
I kept on with this because this world, the characters, and the story were just so fascinating—there was no reason to walk away. I started here to list 2-3 things in particular that drove me on, but I couldn’t just pick a couple. I needed to know everything Chen wanted to tell me about this ship and crew. Period.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

One of the—if not the—most prominent things I picked up is trust. The need for trust, how people react when someone breaks that trust, and how hard it is to re-establish it. But for those who can rebuild—or have the grace to keep it—how great a safety it is. And, sadly, the damage that can be done when the wrong people are trusted.

In this book, that goes beyond humanity to other races, too.

There’s also a great deal to say about loyalty–and combating loyalties. The Horizon‘s crew has a great deal of loyalty to each other (tested by some trust issues), but they also have loyalties to their families, loved ones, planets, their government, and so on.

Loyalty and trust are both tested and broken on several levels for every character, and the question is–what do you (and the rest of your crew) do in the face of a common challenge when those don’t remain?

So, what did I think about The Photonic Effect?

I don’t think this is Chen’s best work. But I did enjoy watching him cut loose on a Space Opera.

I loved, loved, loved the way that we’re dropped into this thing mid-story–or mid-arc–and had to catch up. Getting to figure out what’s going on while guessing/assuming details of what came before was an extra layer of enjoyment.

There are two primary characters–the Captain and Chief Engineer (I think that’s his title, or maybe I’m just assigning that to him. He’s a Scott/LaForge/Lamarr-type character). I would read a multi-part series with these two–or with either of them. Watching them navigate their way through the twisty plot and strange events is more than enough for me.

I was on the edge of my seat throughout the book, while filling in the backstory all the while; the cast of characters was outstanding, with many competing motivations throughout (all of them believable); the universe this was set in could be the framework for a huge series, and it was nice to be introduced to. It missed the je ne sais quoi to make me rave about–but I can’t imagine someone picking it up and not coming away satisfied.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Towel Day ’26: Scattered Thoughts about Reading The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy Trilogy

(updated and revised this 5/25/26)

A Blue towel with the words Towel Day on it
I’ve been trying for a few years now to come up with a tribute to Adams. This isn’t quite what I had in mind, but it’s a start. In my mind, this is a work in progress (a multiple-year project), but I’m posting it anyway. Next year’s version will be better—or at least more complete.


Some time in 7th or 8th grade (I believe), I was at a friend’s house, and his brother let us try his copy of the text-based Hitchhiker’s Guide game, and we were no good at it at all. Really, it was embarrassing. However, his brother had a copy of the first novel, and we all figured that the novel held the keys we needed for success with the game (alas, it did not help us one whit). My friends all decided that I’d be the one to read the book and come back in a few days as an expert.

I fell in love with the book almost instantly, and I quickly forgot about the game. Adams’ irreverent style rocked my world—could people actually get away with saying some of these things? His skewed take on the world, his style, his humor…and a depressed robot, too! It was truly love at first read. As I recall, I started re-reading it as soon as I finished it—the only time in my life I’ve done that sort of thing.

Also, I finally understood that song, “Marvin, I Love You,” that I kept hearing on Dr. Demento.

It was one of those experiences that, looking back, I can say shaped my reading and thinking for the rest of my life (make of that what you will). Were my life the subject of a Doctor Who or Legends of Tomorrow episode, it’d be one of those immutable fixed points. I got my hands on the next three books as quickly as I could (the idea of a four-volume trilogy was one of the funniest ideas I’d encountered up to that point in my life), and devoured them. I do know that I didn’t understand all of the humor, several of the references shot past me at the speed of light, and I couldn’t appreciate everything that was being satirized. But what I did understand, I thought was brilliant. Not only did I find it funny, the series taught me about comedy—how to construct a joke, how to twist it in ways a reader wouldn’t always expect, and when not to twist but to go for the obviously funny idea. The trilogy also helped me to learn to see the absurdity in life.

One of the big lessons that HHGTTG taught me was something I didn’t realize for quite some time- I noticed and talked about it, but I didn’t really realize what was going on. Whether in the game, the novel, the TV show, or the radio show (my local library getting those tapes was a revelation)–Adams took several key scenes and put them in different order, almost completely intact (although with some different jokes sometimes). Each time he did that, it was to play to the strength of the various media. I learned later that he did this for a couple of other versions, and then the movie. When it comes to story–you can keep the big items and play with them to get them to serve your aim, without doing any real damage to the core of your story/point. Like I said, it took a while for me to get the vocabulary to describe that–or to spend any time thinking about it beyond, “hey, that’s cool how he did that.” It’s just one of those things that stuck deep in my mind.

Outside of one family member–HHGTTG was my first exposure to an atheist. I mean, I knew they existed–the way I knew Australia existed. I’d read about it in books, maybe seen it on a TV show or something (hey, I was a kid from a small town in Southern Idaho in the 80s). But here was a guy wearing that on his sleeve–but he made a joke about it. Well, he made a few jokes–several by the end of the trilogy (including at least one that undercut them all). I didn’t threaten my young faith or rattle me, it was more of a “huh, so that’s what they’re like.” Nothing scary, just silly. I also have to say–again, sheltered kid from Idaho pre-Internet–that one of those jokes involved someone getting killed at a zebra crossing. It wasn’t until a few reads in that I started to wonder if that was actually a thing, and not another of his Adams’ jokes about a special road crossing for those particular animals. It was a learning experience for me in many ways.

Years later, when the final volume (by Adams) was released, I’d already cemented what I thought about the books from these frequent re-reads. I’m not sure that Mostly Harmless changed things much (except for making me think for the first time that maybe I didn’t want him to write more in this series). His non-Hitchhiker’s work illustrated that he was capable of making you see things in a new light–either with a smile or a sense of regret—even when he wasn’t writing the trilogy, even when he was writing non-fiction. It was never the setting or the genre—it was Adams.

But here on Towel Day—as with most of the time I talk about Adams (but I need to change that), it comes down to where I started—the Trilogy. I read the books (particularly the first) so many times that I can quote significant portions of them, and frequently do so without noticing that I’m doing that. I have (at this time) two literary-inspired tattoos, one of which is the planet logo* featured on the original US covers. In essence, I’m saying that Adams and the series that made him famous have had an outsized influence on my life and are probably my biggest enduring fandom. If carrying around a (massively useful) piece of cloth for a day in some small way honors his memory? Sure, I’m in.

So, Happy Towel Day, You Hoopy Froods.

* I didn’t know it at the time, but Adams didn’t like that guy. Whoops.

Don't Panic

Towel Day ’26: Do You Know Where Your Towel Is?

(updated and revised this 5/25/26)

A Blue towel with the words Towel Day on it

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy has a few things to say on the subject of towels.

A towel, it says, is about the most massively useful thing an interstellar hitchhiker can have. Partly it has great practical value. You can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble-sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapors; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a miniraft down the slow heavy River Moth; wet it for use in hand-to-hand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal (such a mind-bogglingly stupid animal, it assumes that if you can’t see it, it can’t see you); you can wave your towel in emergencies as a distress signal, and of course dry yourself off with it if it still seems to be clean enough.

More importantly, a towel has immense psychological value. For some reason, if a strag (strag: non-hitch hiker) discovers that a hitch hiker has his towel with him, he will automatically assume that he is also in possession of a toothbrush, face flannel, soap, tin of biscuits, flask, compass, map, ball of string, gnat spray, wet weather gear, space suit etc., etc. Furthermore, the strag will then happily lend the hitch hiker any of these or a dozen other items that the hitch hiker might accidentally have “lost”. What the strag will think is that any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still knows where his towel is is clearly a man to be reckoned with.

Hence a phrase that has passed into hitchhiking slang, as in “Hey, you sass that hoopy Ford Prefect? There’s a frood who really knows where his towel is.” (Sass: know, be aware of, meet, have sex with; hoopy: really together guy; frood: really amazingly together guy.)

Towel Day, for the few who don’t know, is the annual celebration of Douglas Adams’ life and work. It was first held two weeks after his death, fans were to carry a towel with them for the day to use as a talking point to encourage those who have never read HHGTTG to do so, or to just converse with someone about Adams. Adams is one of that handful of authors that I can’t imagine I’d be the same without having encountered/read/re-read/re-re-re-re-read, and so I do my best to pay a little tribute to him each year, even if it’s just carrying around a towel. TowelDay.org is the best collection of resources on the day.

In commemoration of this date, here’s most of what I’ve written about Adams. I’ve struggled to come up with new material to share for Towel Day over the years, mostly sticking with updating and revising existing posts. And, this year is no exception. A few years back, I did a re-read of all of Adams’ (completed) fiction. For reasons beyond my ken (or recollection), I didn’t get around to blogging about the Dirk Gently books, but I did do the Hitchhiker’s Trilogy:
bullet The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
bullet The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
bullet Life, The Universe and Everything
bullet So Long, and Thanks For All The Fish
bullet Mostly Harmless
bullet I had a thing or two to say about the 40th Anniversary of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
bullet I took a look at the 42nd Anniversary Illustrated Edition of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

I should also point to a posts I wrote about Douglas Adams’ London by Yvette Keller and 42: The Wildly Improbable Ideas of Douglas Adams edited by Kevin Jon Davies—both are great ways of filling out one’s understanding of Adams and his work. I have to mention the one book that Adams/Hitchhiker’s aficionado needs to read is Don’t Panic by Neil Gaiman, David K. Dickson and MJ Simpson.

If you’re more in the mood for a podcast, I’d suggest The Waterstones Podcast How We Made: The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy—I’ve listened to several podcast episodes about this book, and generally roll my eyes at them. But this is just fantastic. Were it available, I’d listen to a Peter Jackson-length version of the episode.

I’ve only been able to get one of my sons into Adams, he’s the taller, thinner one in the picture from a few several years ago.

I’m trying to pass this on to the next generation as well. Here’s his son, the Grand-critter, from 2 years ago:

You really need to check out this comic from Sheldon Comics—part of the Anatomy of Authors series: The Anatomy of Douglas Adams.

Lit in a Nutshell gives this quick explanation of The Hitchiiker’s Guide:

One of my favorite posts there is this pretty cool video, shot on the ISS by astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti.

Even better—here’s an appearance by Douglas Adams himself from the old Letterman show—I’m so glad someone preserved this:

Love the anecdote (Also, I want this tie.)

Don't Panic

Page 1 of 124

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén