Once Upon a Time in Hollywood by Quentin Tarantino is a thing that I read

Once Upon a Time in Hollywood by Quentin Tarantino Mass Market Paperback, 400 pg. Harper Perennial Paperback, 2021 Read: September 22-23, 2021 Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

What’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood About?

This is novelization—and retooling (as I understand)—of Tarantino’s 2019 movie. It follows two days (with typical Tarantino flashbacks and flashforwards for many of these characters) in the lives of a few people in 1969 Hollywood. A former TV star who had his shot at movie fame, and missed—he’s now a traveling bad guy (“heavy”) guest star on TV shows. His stunt double/gofer/driver, notorious for getting away with murder (and is somehow possibly the most sympathetic character. Also, Sharon Tate, Squeaky Fromme, and Charlie Manson.

The Packaging

I trust whoever put this book together got a nice bonus—or at least a good bonhomie slap on the back—it’s so well done. The whole thing is a throwback—the cover style looks like a movie novelization from the 70s/early 80s, with stills from the film. Inside you get a lot of the full-page advertisements for novels (and novelizations) that were era-appropriate and common in the back of Mass Market Paperbacks at the time.

It was a nice little treat.

So, what did I think about Once Upon a Time in Hollywood?

Eh…I’m not sure. I guess I should say that I didn’t watch the film—outside of the writer/director—there was nothing about it that appealed to me. I only picked this up out of curiosity about Tarantino as a prose-writer. That colored my appreciation of the novel for sure. It’s not surprising at all that a movie that didn’t appeal to me resulted in a novel that left me unmoved.

I’m glad I got to see what Tarantino was like as a novelist. I know what he’s like as a screenplay writer and director. And this was different—but similar. Had this been anyone else writing, I’d have commented on how well they capture the Tarantino-vibe. There are so many (seemingly?) aimless stories shared by characters that can only come from him (or someone trying to rip him off).

There’s also this nice recurring thing where a story is being told—characters introduced, etc.—that turns out to be the characters and story of the pilot episode that the has-been actor is shooting. Sort of a novelization within a novelization. That was neat—and there’s so much more going on in that story and with those characters than is possible for a 1969 TV Western, that I give myself a little slack

But as for the novel itself? Eh, I don’t know. I guess I think I understand the point—I just don’t see where they were stories that need to be told. It wasn’t a bad novel, and I don’t resent the time I spent reading it (as I frequently do with books that don’t work for me)—and I enjoyed bits of it quite a lot. But I’ve got nothing to say good or ill about it. Put this down as the most tepid of 3 stars.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.