The Broken Detective
by Joel Nedecky
DETAILS:
Publisher: Runamok Books
Publication Date: October 15, 2025
Format: ARC
Length: 262 pg.
Read Date: October 29-30, 2025
What’s The Broken Detective About?
Our protagonist-narrator is a PI who just lost his license (a felony conviction will do that to a guy) and who is headed to prison in a couple of weeks (a felony conviction will do that to a guy). Jake’s major concern at this moment is his mother—she’s disabled and addicted, and cannot be trusted to pay her bills or feed herself anything but alcohol. Jake’s it—but Jake’s thrown all that away (also, related to his mom, but mostly because of dumb choices).
So Jake needs to make as much money as he possibly can over the next two weeks—he has a figure in mind, one he probably can’t meet. But he has a goal—bank robbery is probably the most likely way to meet it, but there are problems there (aside from the legality)—he’d probably get caught (I should mention that he’s a barely functional addict—which led to the dumb choices above) and then things would be worse for mom.
Thankfully, someone has a case for Jake, and she doesn’t care about the licensing. Her sister has been missing, she can’t go to the cops, but her sister needs to be found before it’s too late for her. This woman wasn’t even referred to Jake because of his skills (which is probably good). She’s sent to see Jake because Jake will go to the wretched hives of scum and villainy that this woman’s sister traveled in, because he belongs there, too. He won’t stick out like a sore thumb, and people will talk to him.
One broken detective looking for a missing and broken woman.
This will lead him into the paths of drug dealers, questionable authorities, a cult (or is it?) that the sisters once belonged to, other questionable associates of both sisters, and possibly a shot at hope for Jake and the missing woman.
The Title
I have several thoughts about the title—first, it’s incredibly fitting. On the other hand…
There’s part of me that wonders who the definite article is referring to—obviously, Jake’s the “The” in view, we know he’s broken from the get-go, and we never get anything but reinforcement of that fact. However, over the course of the novel, we meet more than one detective who fits that description. A Broken Detective or The Broken Detectives would work just as well as a title
But really, that just means the detectives we encounter are just like everyone else in the book. Everyone is broken (yes, like in reality, but it’s a bit easier to see here). From the witnesses, the bystanders, the victims, the complicit, and the guilty—from the first page to the last, this book could—and possibly should—simply be called The Broken. Don’t mistake broken for morally bent (or worse), but life and others have taken these people and have left them as other than they started, other than they could’ve been. Not whole, not intact, but broken.
But it’s not, it’s The Broken Detective, and it’s probably up to the reader to decide if it’s Jake or another candidate.
So, what did I think about The Broken Detective?
I hemmed and hawed about if I should say more about the plot and characters—but after a few tries, I opted not to. Everything I tried to say felt like a spoiler—it’s best if you learn about all involved the same way Jake does (or when he tells you about them, in the case of people he knows already). Because, sure, the book is about Jake looking for this woman. But really, it’s about Jake figuring out who he is, who he wants to be, and if he wants to do the required work to get from here to there. So it’s best for the reader to take the journey with Jake and come in with few preconceived notions.
Or so I think, anyway.
One critique I have is that I’m not sure that bringing in an church/cult from “the real world” as a comparison/parallel to the one in this book was necessary—or that the stone that Jake turned over as a result of his research was necessary. It turned a murky and questionable group (up to some horrible, repugnantly illegal stuff) into a creepy murky and questionable group (up to some horrible, repugnantly illegal stuff). Just a step too far. There was no ambiguity about the church already—I don’t see what he gained by making them worse.
Early on, I noticed something—and then backtracked to check to make sure I was right, and then watched for it going on. Nedecky cares about the last line/paragraph of a chapter. Obviously, he cares about every line and paragraph, but it feels like he puts extra care into those. Not in the way that some do to propel you into the next chapter (not that there’s anything wrong with that), but it’s like he knows that a chapter end is likely to be where someone puts the book down for one reason or another—and Nedecky wants to leave his reader with something to think about. It’ll either be an emotional punch or a line to chew on.
I had things I needed to accomplish the night I started this, so I forced myself to put it down—but this could’ve easily been a one-sitting book. This novel got its hooks in me and didn’t want to let go.
The ending—and the final revelations—will not make anyone happy. Well, it shouldn’t. But it will satisfy and gratify you—because of the storytelling involved, because it’s fitting, because it’s as noir as you can get. You won’t walk away with a smile on your face and a song in your heart, but you’ll walk away with that satisfaction that comes from a near-perfect execution.
I highly recommend this.
This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
1 Pingback