Author: HCNewton Page 8 of 602

2026 Plans and Challenges

Finally it’s time to stop looking at 2025 (as fun as I hope that is’s been) and to start focusing on 2026.
2026 Plans and Challenges
Last year was a disaster for my plans and goals…both those stated and unstated. That only bothers me a little–I had too much fun with what I did accomplish, and was so tired because of everything else in life that perspective is easy. This is a hobby–I didn’t hobby the way I wanted to. But, still, hobbying was done.

This year

I do have things I want to accomplish here over the next 12 months for a variety of reasons—and listing them like this helped last year (although, you’ll see a lot of echoes here from that post. But most of those echoes are of a “continue doing this” nature). So, here’s what I’m going to shoot for around here in the next 12 months.
bullet Cut down on my Goodreads Want-to-Read list and the unread books that I own (a perennial project, but 2024 was not good for the size of that stack)—I’m going to talk about that more in a minute.
bullet Any book that I buy this year, I want to read this year (unless I buy it for a 2027 project). I will fail at this. But I’m going to try.
bullet I’m going to continue to be picky in the Book Tours I participate in. I still like Tours, they expose me to things I wouldn’t normally read—and I’m going to keep doing them. But if I’m picky, it helps me focus on other things.
bullet I’m cutting back on the Reading Challenges I’m going for.
bullet Try to interview more authors (maybe others, too?), and get better at that, too. The Literary Locals series is helping with that. Hopefully that also means more of the HC Chats, too.
bullet I want to continue the Literary Locals.
bullet I plan on pressing forward with Grandpappy’s Corner, and hopefully do posts for it more frequently. One of my challenges (below) will help.

2026 Book Challenges


Goodreads Challenge
2026 Goodreads Challenge
Last year, I lowered this goal, and am sticking with it. This is mostly an attempt to shift my attention away from the numbers–I honestly don’t care about them, I talk about them just as an indicator of how I spend my time (for myself), although it often comes across as something else. I’m also planning on tackling some more thought-provoking and slower reads this year, so this might help me not care about that. We’ll see how that works.


My TBR Range Challenge
Owned but Not Read Chart
I’ve been joking about Mt. TBR for a couple of years now, and then I saw some meme recently talking about some having TBR Piles and others having a mountain range. Of course, I liked that image. Around that time, I started thinking about how my pile has grown a lot over the last couple of years specifically. And I decided to look at the list by year (well, I took a few by aggregate because the numbers were so small). I found the results disturbing–but a little heartwarming for 2021-23, to give myself a little credit. I’m going to attack things here.

(thankfully, it’s hard to tell that there are slivers of yellow for Audiobooks, but it’s there)


Reading with Wrigs
Reading with Wrigs ChallengeThe Tradition continues. I finished this one with room to spare last year–far better than the year before when I missed it for the first time. Gotta make it a streak.


The 2026 Booktempter’s TBR Challenge

The 2026 Booktempter's TBR Challenge
I really appreciate the way this one is put together, and it’s pretty easy—just 1 book a month and my TBR should go down by at least 12, more if I can squeeze in some of the stretch goals. This has been pretty helpful the last few years, and I expect the same this year.


25 Greatest Picture Books of the Past 25 Years
When I saw Slate’s 25 Greatest Picture Books of the Past 25 Years list last Fall, I decided it needed to be a personal challenge for this year. And, hey, I read one of them a couple of years ago. This has gotta be in the bag.

25 Greatest Picture Books of the Past 25 Years list


2026 Speccy Fiction Challenge
I was going to call it enough with the above (and probably the below), but then shelleyrae @ Book’d Out invited me to participate in the 2026 Speccy Fiction Challenge, and I can’t resist. Also… it looks fun.

2026 Speccy Fiction Challenge


20 Books of Summer
Assuming that this is done again–hopefully last year’s hosts are up for it–I’ll be there. It’s a fun tradition.

20 Books of Summer 2025 logo


That’s everything I have planned, I can’t wait to see what unplanned things happen around here. Hope you’re around to join in the fun!

The image for the Picture book list is taken from the article. The Book stack image by yeliao521 from Pixabay

She Who Became the Sun by Shelley Parker-Chan: Historic China with a Hint of Fantasy

Cover of She Who Became the Sun by Shelley Parker-ChanShe Who Became the Sun

by Shelley Parker-Chan

DETAILS:
Series: The Radiant Emperor, #1
Publisher: Tor Books
Publication Date: June 28, 2022
Format: Paperback
Length: 411 pg. 
Read Date: January 8-10, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s She Who Became the Sun About?

This is an epic saga about a China-that-Could-Have-Been back in the 1340s. We follow (well, several people, but let’s focus on a couple of primaries) a young girl who assumes her dead brother’s identity and becomes a monk. This brother had been predicted to rise to greatness (as he was practically starving due to drought and famine, this was quite the fortune to receive). Zhu eventually becomes involved with the rebellion against Mongol rule, and begins to find her way to a new life—one of greatness and power.

On the other hand, we follow General Ouyang, one of the main leaders of the forces set to put down the rebellion. Ouyang is the one member of his family who survived the Khan’s wrath—as a eunuch. He is trusted by some in power, while many others consider him defective and untrustworthy, despite his victories and viciousness.

When these two meet on opposing sides of the conflict—both their lives are set in new directions, and the fate of a nation may be, too.

A Question of Genre

At a couple of points along the line—the last time was about the 2/3 point, I put in my notes, “Where’s the Fantasy?” (I wrote that larger than usual that last time). The elements are just not there—at least not as much as you’d expect in something shelved in that part of a store. In talking with a friend about it, I started calling it the La Croix of Fantasy novels.

It’s there, if you can really focus on it and hope. I have been assured that the Fantasy elements are stronger in the second part of the duology—but not much.

If this had been sold as General Fiction, or Alternate History or something—no one would’ve objected. And I wouldn’t have been distracted by wondering when magic or a dragon or something would come up.

As a fictionalized 14th-century China with a couple of tweaks—this is a great world, and the setting (place and time) is great.

What does this book tell us about humanity?

I’m not entirely sure that this book has much to say about people in general. It has something to say about particular characters—and that can be applied to some, but not all.

Zhu starts off wanting to survive—with the thought that she could claim her brother’s fortune. It’s debatable, but I do think she has some sort of genuine Buddhist convictions—if only because that’s what she’s supposed to believe. Before ordination, she’s given some permission to not be that devout. And her convictions turn to herself—there may be some vague faith about things in general, but ultimately she’s convinced of her own abilities (and if she has to pay for that in lifetimes to come, she’s ready to accept it).

At one point, Zhu—in the midst of trying to encourage someone else—gives sort of her personal mission statement.

“But you know what’s worse than suffering? Not suffering, because you’re not even alive to feel it… Learn to want something for yourself, Ma Xiuying. Not what someone says you should want. Not what you think you should want. Don’t go through life thinking only of duty. When all we have are these brief spans between our nonexistences, why not make the most of the life you’re living now? The price is worth it.”

Without getting into the rightness or wrongness of her choices throughout the book (and she has plenty of both). I’ve come to think of Zhu as a Walter White character. She starts off as clever and resourceful, looking to do the “right thing.” But at a certain point, she realizes how clever and resourceful she is—and what kind of success can come from that, and her pride (warranted or not)—pride that can (should?) be seen as arrogance—starts to fuel her.

On the other hand, we have Ouyang. He is trapped by Fate. Or his idea of it—expectations of honor, family obligation, and therefore Destiny. He comes close to rebelling—or at least pushing against it—but is it close enough? He exercises agency and free will throughout—but it almost seems like he doesn’t think he can. Early on, he seems more lawless, more independent (for lack of a better word)—but by the end, he seems more constrained. Sort of the flipside.

In the book club meeting, the question was asked, “Does greatness necessitate cruelty in this world?” I’ve been chewing on that a lot. I don’t think so—I think there are a couple of examples of greatness (those perceived to be great, anyway) without cruelty. But by and large, the answer in this particular world is a resounding, “yes.” Or at least just about everyone thinks it’s the case. No one looking for greatness, or who happens to be in a position of greatness here can make it without cruelty. It is the epitome of a dog-eat-dog world, and as Norm Peterson would say, everyone is wearing Milkbone underwear.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

I picked this up because it was the month’s pick for the Fantasy Book Club. And for quite a while, that was what kept me going. There were moments that made me think, “Oh, now we’re getting somewhere,” but that didn’t last for long. But curiosity and investment in a couple of secondary characters set in.

Also, I had to answer the question, “Where is the Fantasy?”

So, what did I think about She Who Became the Sun?

I’m really not sure. There was so much that worked here—but I’m not sure how satisfied I was with it in the end.

Parker-Chen can write some glorious lines—they can do more with one sentence of description than many authors can do in paragraphs. And getting to read them do more of that (if I get around to the sequel or wait until a new work) would be a treat.

For a book about war, it’s a relatively bloodless novel. Battles that take out thousands—conquer cities can take less than a page. If you want combat, you’re going to need some one-on-one situations—and there aren’t many. Battle, warfare, is the context of these events—it’s not the focus. Which is a pretty cool thing to see.

As much as I found the characters to be rich and complex (and I spared us all my bloviating about more of them—including the two or three that I like a lot more than those I talked about)—I’m not sure they’re enough to get excited about, alone. But this is a novel about more than the characters and the plot. There’s a lot going on about the nature of fate/destiny, gender, sexuality, morality, ancestry/ethnicity…

Is this a good read? Yes. Could it be better? Oh, yes. But a lot of that has to do with my expectations (magic, creatures, etc.). I just wanted a little more out of the book. If you go into this with the right expectations, you’ll probably get a lot more out of it and appreciate it more than I did. It’s worth the effort.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

WWW Wednesday—January 14, 2026

No intro today, let’s just get to business:

WWW Wednesdays Logo

This meme was formerly hosted by MizB at A Daily Rhythm and revived on Taking on a World of Words—and shown to me by Aurore-Anne-Chehoke at Diary-of-a-black-city-girl.

The Three Ws are:
What are you currently reading?
What did you recently finish reading?
What do you think you’ll read next?

Seems easy enough, right? Let’s take a peek at this week’s answers:

What are you currently reading?

Cover of Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky Cover of Battle Ground by Jim Butcher
Children of Time
by Adrian Tchaikovsky
Battle Ground
by Jim Butcher, read by James Marsters

I’ve barely scratched the surface of Tchaikovsky’s book, but am eager to get going deeper.

Well, I remember why Butcher is officially dead to me. Which is not to suggest that I’m not casting aside eerything else that I’m doing when the Twelve Months comes out next week. But I’m not sure I’ll forgive him for one of the events of this book.

What did you recently finish reading?

Cover of The Hunted by Steven Max Russo Cover of Peace Talks by Jim Butcher
The Hunted
by Steven Max Russo
Peace Talks
by Jim Butcher, read by James Marsters

You can always count on Russo for a rousing Thriller–great story.

Just couldn’t shake the sense of impending doom with Peace Talks (and just wished Dresden took two opportunities to just talk to people and spare himself a lot of grief).

What do you think you’ll read next?

Cover of Lit by Tim Sandlin Cover of Everyone in the Group Chat Dies by L.M. Chilton
Lit
by Tim Sandlin
Everyone in the Group Chat Dies
by L.M. Chilton, read by Kimberly Capero

champing at the bit to get at it since I first read about it last Fall.

I liked Chilton’s Swiped, and wonder what she does with this Thriller about a “TikTok true crime investigator, a ’90s serial killer that may not be as dead as everyone would like, a text thread from hell, and long buried secrets that just won’t stay in the grave where they belong.”

What’s on your nightstands/side tables/eReader/etc.?

Everybody Wants to Rule the World by Ace Atkins: A Tale of Sussudio and Spies

Cover of Everybody Wants to Rule the World by Ace AtkinsEverybody Wants to Rule the World

by Ace Atkins

DETAILS:
Publisher: William Morrow
Publication Date: December 02, 2025
Format: Hardcover
Length: 368 pg.
Read Date: January 6-7, 2026
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s Everybody Wants to Rule the World About?

The year is 1985, and apparently, there are USSR spies everywhere. At least in Washington, D.C. and Atlanta, GA. Reagan’s push for his “Star Wars” program is strong, and the KGB wants to know all it can about it before a summit between Gorbachev and Reagan. Tensions are high, cards are set up, and one teenaged boy is about to send them toppling over.

Because his mom is dating a jerk and Peter has an active imagination fueled by pulp novels and sensationalized “news.” He becomes convinced that his mom is dating a Russian agent and tries to enlist the help of a mostly failed novelist (and his drag queen buddy, a retired NFL player) to expose the boyfriend.

Meanwhile, a KGB officer defects so he can reunite with the love of his life; an actual Russian agent (who may, or may not be the boyfriend) has killed someone; the FBI is investigating that death, and another Federal agent wants to run away with an exotic dancer and is trying to leverage that defector to help him do that.

There’s gotta be another storyline or three that I didnt’t squeeze into that paragraph, too.

The point is, there’s a lot going on. Few of the people involved are properly qualified to deal with it. And the direction of the Cold War hinges on what happens over the next few weeks.

It should be noted that this is a comedy.

Why did I pick this up? Why did I keep reading?

It’s Ace Atkins—the last decade has taught me that I’m likely to enjoy a book he writes. Also—a comedic take on Russian deep cover agents in the 80s is right up my alley. Put the two of those together…

I stuck with it because that’s exactly what was delivered. A great plot with more twists than a corkscrew, a great voice, and an oddball cast of characters.

What Does this Book Say about Humanity?

There is a deep thread of self-deception going on throughout the book—the stories we tell ourselves about who we are, how others regard us, and what we think we’re capable of.

There are a couple of major characters who are honest about themselves—and largely understand others. But the rest are deluded to one degree or another—how heroic they are, how things will go when they reunite with an old flame, how their life will be better when they ditch their wife and kids for someone new (who any rational person will see isn’t that into you), how the world is against them, and so on.

Some of these are understandable—the teenage male tossing aside common sense because a hot stranger seems into him. Some are relatable, maybe even admirable—the writer who hasn’t sold anything in ages continuing to try. But the others are kind of sad once you stop to think about them—but you do have to force yourself to stop and think about them, because Atkins has you too focused on jogging to keep up with the book and chuckling at their foibles.

The 80s of It

There are a couple of ways to approach the time setting of the 80s. One way is to go over-the-top like The Wedding Singer or That 80s Show. The other way is restrained—like The Americans or Mad Men (different era, but same idea).

Atkins mostly stuck to the restrained approach, it is an 80s story with 80s concerns and ideas and the setting is appropriately depicted.

But every now and then, in the spirit of the book’s flavor, I do think he went a little over-the-top with the references in a Sandler-esque way. And I loved each time he did that. Over all, Atkins goes for realism and restraint—but when he indulges himself (and/or the reader), it’s just a treat.

Oh, and this is maybe a Content Warning I should give…you’ll find yourselves thinking a lot about Prince and Phil Collins, possibly driven to listen to them…at the very least, you’ll have a couple of songs acting as earworms for days.

So, what did I think about Everybody Wants to Rule the World?

I wasn’t thrilled with Atkins stepping away from the Spenser or Quinn Colson series, as curious as I was about what he’d do next. I’m still not—but if this is what he’s doing instead? I’m getting over it quickly.

This was ridiculous fun. Fast-paced, not quite frantic (because Atkins doesn’t let it happen) filled with crazy coincidences, turns you cannot see coming, twists you think you see coming and are only right occasionally, real people doing stupid and human things—frequently illegal, too.

It is a comedic work, but that comedy is successful because none of the characters is in a comedy. They’re all deadly serious (though some will express that by being a smart arse), worried, scared, or scheming. The danger is real, the stakes are high, people get hurt, lives are changed—it’s a very straightforward thriller that way. But when you can see the whole board, see what they don’t know—it’ll bring a grin to your face and possibly a cackle from you.

A lot of social media/news media can make us all think that the world is ending (and, I’m not for a second suggesting that it might not be)—but this book reminds us that it’s almost ended before. And we’re now far enough away from the genuine, grounded, and realistic fears that we can laugh at them. Isn’t it nice to think that 40 years from now, someone can write a book about now to relieve some stress?

I expected to enjoy this book, I didn’t expect to have fun with it. I don’t know how readers who grew up post-Cold War will react to it. But readers of a certain age will have a good time with Everybody Wants to Rule the World.

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

New Year Bookish Resolutions Book Tag 2026

New Year Bookish Resolutions Book Tag 2026
I saw this over on The Strawberry Post, and it seemed like a good way to start to get my plans in order.

An author you’d like to read that you’ve never read?

That’s a great question. I honestly can’t think of one—at least not that I think I’ll make time for this year. Dorothy Sayers—yeah, I’ve read some of her non-fiction, but I haven’t dabbled into her Mystery novels. Agatha Christie (gasp! Shock! I know, I know)—but my guess is that I’ll push that off again. Maybe Dashiell Hammett? I actually bought one of his books last year, that seems most likely.

Oh, oh, I know—Paul D. Brazill! Yeah, I’ve got a hankering to read his stuff and have a very nice looking copy of Guns of Brixton sitting next to my desk.

Cover of Guns of Brixton by Paul D. Brazill

Guns of Brixton by Paul D. Brazill


A book you’d like to read?

Oh, just so, so many. I’m going to go with The Troubled Deep by Rob Parker. I opened it months ago when I got it, read the first couple of pages and wanted to dive in then (pun unintended, but it made me smile). I trust there’s a good reason that I didn’t—but I need to make room for it. (I could also mention Noelle Holten’s His Truth Her Truth or the two Lee Goldberg books I didn’t make time for last year—mind boggling, or….)
The Troubled Deep by Robert Parker

The Troubled Deep by Rob Parker


A classic you’d like to read?

I’ve had a hankering for The Count of Monte Cristo for the last couple of years—I’m not sure where it came from, but it keeps popping up in the back of my mind. I should probably fix that.


A book you’d like to re-read?

Umm…I think Kings of the Wyld is coming up for a book club, and I’d love an excuse to re-read that. Thinking of the first volume of Chu’s The War Arts Saga, too.
Kings of the Wyld by Nicholas Eames

Kings of the Wyld by Nicholas Eames/span>


A book you’ve had for ages and want to read?

This is where I should insert a .gif of me weeping uncontrollably. There’s just so many… Everything I mentioned in this post. Everything I thought about mentioning in thsi post Everything I should’ve thought about mentioning.


A big book you’d like to read?

Herne’s A Curse of Krakens. As good as that series has been, it’s mind-boggling that I keep delaying reading it.
Cover of A Curse of Krakens by Kevin Hearne

A Curse of Krakens by Kevin Hearne

or…What’s Next, something I’ve been trying to find time for since last 2024. Without actually counting pages of various books, those’re the biggest sitting on my TBR shelves.
Cover of What's Next by Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack

What’s Next by Melissa Fitzgerald and Mary McCormack


An author you’ve previously read and would like to read more of?

JCM Berne. There’s just no reason that I haven’t read everything by him. (are there others I could name here? Yup. But Berne’s weighing on me)


A book you got for Christmas and would like to read?

If only…I don’t get books for the holidays. Sure, I have several lists my family can access with ideas, but it just doesn’t happen. An author gave me a book at an event in November—that’s the closest thing I can think of—so, I guess I’ll say Entombed by Kate Baray. Which looks like a lot of fun.Cover of Entombed by Kate Baray.

Entombed by Kate Baray


A series you want to read from start to finish?

Huh. I cannot think of one. Probably because I can only think of series I haven’t finished/caught up on. Okay, readers—hit me. What series (think small, please—let’s be realistic) should I tackle en toto this year?


A series you want to finish that you’ve already started?

Okay…let’s see. There’s the aforementioned War Arts Saga, The Seven Kennings, and Hybrid Helix series. Winslow’s Danny Ryan trilogy. The Broken Blades books. Dark Lord Davi duology, and—probably most of all: Red Rising I know it’s going to destroy me. But I need to know how Brown’s going to wrap it all up.


Do you set reading goals?  If so how many books do you want to read in 2026?

I have few reading goals this year (a more complete post on this is coming soon). There are 3 big ones this year—1. Any book that I buy this year, I want to read this year (unless I buy it for a 2027 project). 2. I want to read the 24 of Slate’s 25 Greatest Picture Books of the Past 25 Years that I haven’t already. 3. I want to reduce my Owned-But-Not-Read, stack. It’s just out of control.
I set my Goodreads goal at 225. I’m not that invested in hitting that, and if I don’t because I’m reading a bunch of fat books that take thought and time? I’m okay with that. If I don’t hit it for other reasons…well, that probably says something about my health/mental state, and should set off alarm bells for me/my family.


As usual, I’m not tagging anyone in this—but I’d like to see what you all have to come up with.

Dogged by Michael R. Fletcher: Wardogs Don’t Give Up

Cover of Dogged by Michael R. FletcherDogged

by Michael R. Fletcher

DETAILS:
Publication Date: December 8, 2025
Format: eARC
Length: 293 pg.
Read Date: December 20-23, 2025
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s Dogged About?

Dogged Determination and her mate, Vigilant Aggression, are Wardogs, a canine-humanoid race. They, like the rest of their squad are dedicated to going to other worlds to spread the Emperor’s peace (which could look like conquering a civilization and subduing the populace to someone who isn’t a Wardog). One fateful day, they are marching in formation through a wizard’s portal off to the next mission, and the unthinkable happens—the portal collapses, and the line in front of Dogged is caught half-in/half-out of the portal, leaving chunks (for lack of a better word) of the soldiers on each side.

She and her Kennel Master, stunned, go to report to the Emperor and get the permission of one of the advisors for Dogged to investigate what happened.

The one thing that she has going for her is her determination (she’s aptly named)—when she starts something, she sees it through. She’s not the brightest, she’s not subtle, putting together clues is not probably where she’ll shine But she will not stop looking until she knows what happened to her mate, the others, and why.

The Humans

Along the way she inspires the interest—and eventually loyalty—of the first mate of a commercial ship. Well, acting captain of a ship following a dispute between Dogged and his former captain. There’s sort of a friendship that builds between the two, and Balen sees that Dogged’s just not up for the task ahead of her and decides to help her out—basically acting as her human to Wardog translator. Not long after that, they encounter an elementalist who joins up with them.

The three of them together form a new pack of sorts, providing a kind of connection that Dogged was unprepared for and didn’t seem to know was possible. I don’t want to overplay this idea, but it’s really like Balen and Sahar found a lonely and sad dog at a rescue shelter and decided to bring her home with them. And in them, Dogged may have found her forever home (at least emotionally).

The Tone

Dogged is the best kind of unreliable narrator—she’s not lying (deception is hard for her), but her understanding of the world and people outside her experience and training is limited, so the reader will constantly be interpreting her first-person narration. Like any good dog, her observations and reactions will make an observer smile.

At the same time, Dogged is a warrior. She is great with a spear—and not bad with (human-sized) bladed weapons. But even without that, she’s a walking weapon: full sets of claws at the end of her hands, vicious and sharp teeth, and strength to go up against Conan and his mighty thews. And, yes, she’s trying to learn new ways of dealing with problems and questions—she’s being forced to, anyway. But for her entire life, all she’s ever been given to use is a hammer—every instinct, reflex, and response he has is to treat things as nails.

A lot of blood gets spilled, organs are torn, limbs are severed—starting in the opening scene, and it doesn’t let up.

You get this great mix of bloody violence, canine innocence, and heart. It’s hard to explain—but Fletcher pulled off something fantastic here.

So, what did I think about Dogged?

I think I just said it. This is a fantastic read.

The cover appealed to me and made me look into it. Some of the reviews—starting with Andy Peloquin’s—convinced me that I’d probably enjoy this book. Boy howdy, did they undersell it.

On some other day, I might not have relished this the way I did. But there’s no day where I don’t have an absolute great time with it.

I’m on the verge of overhyping this here. I don’t know what else to say that’s not potentially overblown.

This was the right book for me at the right time—I didn’t expect it, but it’s the case. One of my favorites of 2025—probably the 2020s as a whole. I dunno—let me get some distance on it before I start saying things like that.

I’m just telling ya—get this, you won’t be sorry.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from the author in exchange for this post—I read the book because I wanted to, and the opinions expressed are my own.

Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

MUSIC MONDAY: “End of You” by Poppy, Amy Lee, Courtney LaPlante

The Irresponsible Reader's Music Monday logo

Music Monday's originated at The Tattooed Book Geek's fantastic blog and has shown up hither, thither, and yon since then.

Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Fantasy with Friends: What Are Your Favorite Depictions of Fae?

Fantasy with Friends A Discussion Meme Hosted by Pages Unbound

Fantasy with Friends is a weekly meme hosted by the good people over at Pages Unbound. Fantasy with Friends poses questions each Monday about fantasy, either as a genre as a whole or individual works.

This week’s prompt is:

Fae have been popular in fantasy the past couple years. Do you have a favorite portrayal of Fae? What aspects do you think are important to Fae characterization? Do you prefer traditional representations or unique takes?

As with many things, my favorite is the one I’m reading or most recently read. I’ve read so many Dresden Files recently that that’s my answer for now. The Fae Courts that Harry has to navigate (and now represents one of) are a great setup, ripe with drama; to learn (as we do in drips and drabs) what the Courts are up to—and aren’t telling people about—and the details about their inner-workings are just delicious.

But I have a large soft-spot for Toby McGuire’s world, too. And the…oh, wait, the prompt says favorite, not favorites.

What aspects of the Fae are important in a depiction? The impossible beauty, the power (obviously), the inability to lie (and the ever-so-fun ways they devise to deceive with the truth, or carefully selected portions of it), and the danger of iron.

It’s tough to say if I prefer “traditional representations” or something unique. Because I honestly don’t know anymore what’s a “traditional” representation anymore. Everything I can think of falls into unique.* But I’d probably say something unique anyway. That’s the fun thing, isn’t it? Butcher’s take on Wizards, Fae, Vampires, Werewolves, etc. are different than Faith Hunter’s, Drew Hayes’ or Patricia Briggs’. Or, let’s focus on fae: Seanan McGuire’s, Patrick Rothfuss’, and Heather Fawcett’s couldn’t be more different—throw in George MacDonald and you might as well be talking completely different species. It’s great to see the commonalities that all of these share, and the distinctives, too. The idiosyncrasies of each depiction are where the magic lays. You take the “traditional” approach, shave off those aspects you aren’t interested in (or don’t help the story you’re trying to tell), add whatever bits of contemporary feel you want…and bang. You’ve got yourself a wonderful world for story telling.

* This means, as soon as I hit “Schedule” on this post—or, at best, within 24 hours of this posting, I’ll think of at least a half-dozen things I should’ve said here about traditional representations.

I’m sure some of the other posts in response to this prompt will be more thoughtful. I’m looking forward to reading them. Do you have responses to this? (either for the comment section below or from your own post)

My Favorite Theology/Christian Living Books of 2025

Covers of Wisdom for Life, Walking the Way of the Wise, The Anti-Greed Gospel, Becoming God's Family, Letters to Malcolm, The Commentary of Dr. Zacharias Ursinus on the Heidelberg Catechism, The Canvas of Creation, Christ of Consummation Vol. 2, Did Jesus Really Say He Was God?, The Ten Commandments, next to an image of an anthropomorphized Pilcrow and the words 'My Favorites of 2025 Christian Living/Theology'
It’s finally time to wrap these lists, with my favorites in Theology and Christian Living (and related things). There’s some overlap in some of these titles, which just shows what kinds of things I was thinking about this year, I guess. I didn’t read as many books along these lines as I expected to/usually do–mostly because the ones I did read took some work to get through (and I had too many “project reads”). But these would’ve floated to the top in any year.

As always, re-reads don’t count for these lists.

(in alphabetical order by author)

Cover of Wisdom for Life by Michael P. V. BarrettWisdom for Life: 52 Old Testament Meditations

by Michael P. V. Barrett

Barrett writes brief devotional meditations on some Old Testament passages (I’m not sure how brief because I read electronically, but they didn’t take terribly long to read). Which is good enough for a book–but Barrett writes with a depth that I don’t think I’ve come across in a devotional before. He gets to the heart and the nitty-gritty of the passages he looks at–and writes in a way that the reader will find application for their life, understanding of the passage, and a new/renewed reason to worship and serve the One who bought them.

The only thing that impressed me–almost every week–as much as the content was Barret’s ability to accomplish it so briefly.


Cover of Walking the Way of the Wise by Mitchell L. ChaseWalking the Way of the Wise: A Biblical Theology of Wisdom

by Mitchell L. Chase

My original post
I personally benefited from Chase’s definition of “wisdom” and how to find it in Scripture. I really appreciated his unwillingness to make Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, and James the epicenter of his discussion, but to look for it throughout the Scriptures (see above). Tackling the topic of wisdom from a Redemptive Historical point of view rather than a Systematic perspective (which is what I’m used to, as I expect most are), really helped me to see the breadth of it—and even to help with my Systematic understanding of it (as it should).

All in all, this is a truly helpful and insightful read.


Cover of The Anti-Greed Gospel by Malcolm FoleyThe Anti-Greed Gospel:
Why the Love of Money Is the Root of Racism and How the Church Can Create a New Way Forward

by Malcolm Foley

I’ve tried on at least four occasions to write a post about this book, and keep failing. I’m going to keep trying, but in the meantime, I’ll just say that this is one of the best books I read in 2025 regardless of genre/topic. Foley starts with Ida Wells’ point tying racism to money, and expands on that. He traces the connection between the love of money (which we know to be the root of all sorts of evil) and racism/racism-friendly policies and attitudes throughout U.S. History–particularly after the Civil War. And how the Church, to her shame, participates in those.

Then he points the way forward–using a variety of theological tools. Including the Westminster Larger Catechism’s teaching on the Eighth Commandment. It’s inspiring, it’s convicting, it’s full of hope.


Cover of Becoming God's Family by Carmen Joy ImesBecoming God’s Family: Why the Church Still Matters

by Carmen Joy Imes

My original post
Is this the most rigorous, robust work that I’ve ever read on The Church? No. Is this the most technical, theological work I’ve come across? No. Did this take a lot of effort to get through? No (and what a relief). Is this perhaps the most passionate work on the subject I’ve read? Yes. Is it perhaps the most persuasive about the need for individual believers (particularly in an individualist culture) to be involved with the Church? Also, yes.

It’s warm, it’s approachable, it’s learned in a non-off-putting way. Imes is a great guide through the topic and a fun companion through the stroll. She pointed out some things I hadn’t thought of before—and helped me grasp a couple of texts that I’ve struggled with for years.


Cover of Letters to Malcolm by C. S. LewisLetters to Malcolm, Chiefly on Prayer

by C. S. Lewis

There’s a lot of this book that I disagree with–but I appreciate the way that Lewis got to his conclusions. I also admit that Lewis might be closer to right than I am on those points. But the opening letter on prayer is one of the best things I’ve read on the topic, and while the rest of the book doesn’t reach those heights, I truly enjoyed and benefited from considering them. This is one of those books by him I hadn’t gotten around to reading in the past until my little Lewis-immersion project last year. It won’t be the last time.


Cover of Commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism by Zacharias Ursinus The Commentary of Dr. Zacharias Ursinus on the Heidelberg Catechism

by Zacharias Ursinus

As this is written by one of the chief authors of the Heidelberg Catechism, it’s impossible to get a more authoritative take on it. This is essentially the director’s cut of the catechism. Sure, we all know the answers, but how’d you get to that answer? Well, you think like so….

This is a treasure for anyone trying to understand and use the Heidelberg Catechism for personal use or for trying to raise the generation to follow.


Cover of The Canvas of Creation by Drew PoplinThe Canvas of Creation: A Biblical Response to the Heresy of Racial Superiority

by Drew Poplin

My original post
I hate the fact that books decrying the sin (or, in Poplin’s argument, heresy) of racism need to be written now. But the need for them is pretty clear to anyone in the American Church. This brief (perhaps too brief) book is a compelling read, calling racism what it is, an attack on God and His creation. Convicting, and hopefully convincing. It’s well worth the time to read.


Cover of Christ of the Consummation Vol 2 by O. Palmer RobertsonChrist of Consummation: The Testimony of Acts and Paul

by O. Palmer Robertson

Did this floor me as much as the first volume of this set (on the Gospels) did? Nope. But am I going to study Acts or Paul’s letters without consulting this in the future? Bigger nope. Robertson first traces the development of revelation and the Church’s understanding of it through Acts, then he spends the bulk of the book watching Paul’s themes develop and change over the course of his career–never contradictory, never inconsistent, but starting with certain emphases that develop into new ones given the events of his life and the needs of the Church throughout the First Century. It’s really a handy book to work through and to keep on hand for future use.


Cover of Did Jesus Really Say He Was God? by Mikel Del RosarioDid Jesus Really Say He Was God?: Making Sense of His Historical Claims

by Mikel Del Rosario

My original post
Del Rosario’s approach to the subject alone could put him on this list–let’s take an in-depth look at two passages and see what Jesus is claiming for himself in both. Let’s consider what the original audience heard–and seek to understand that by the way they reacted. Then let’s consider the implications of both. Del Rosario writes clearly and compellingly. The text—even when it gets technical—is straightforward and approachable by people who aren’t historical scholars.

Not only does reading this help buttress the confidence a reader has in the passage and Jesus’ claims in them, but Del Rosario gives his readers a model to follow when they come across similar passages.


Cover of The Ten Commandments by Cornelius Van Til The Ten Commandments

by Cornelius Van Til

My original post
This is some pretty clear writing from a man widely considered not to be terribly clear all the time. Some of the commandments don’t get the same level of attention as others–and it makes sense given who Van Til is and his own driving focus.

It’s a very sound introduction, in line with the bulk of the Reformed stream of thought on the Law and its usage from the time of the Reformation forward. But a little more approachable given the length and the fact it was written in the 20th Century.


The Goodness of God in the Gift of Scripture by Uche Anizor: An Encouraging Read

Cover of The Goodness of God in the Gift of Scripture by Uche AnizorThe Goodness of God in the Gift of Scripture: 20 Meditations

by Uche Anizor

DETAILS:
Publisher: Crossway
Publication Date: January 13, 2026
Format: eARC
Length: 224 pg.
Read Date: December 21, 2025
Buy from Bookshop.org Support Indie Bookstores

What’s The Goodness of God in the Gift of Scripture About?

This is a brief devotional book—twenty short readings—primarily based on Psalm 119, discussing gifts God communicates through his word.

I really feel like I should have more to say there, but I don’t know how to get into it. The Table of Contents should give you a decent idea of what to expect:

Introduction: Our Good God and the Grace of Scripture

Chapter 1: The Gift of Blessedness
Chapter 2: The Gift of Purity
Chapter 3: The Gift of No Shame
Chapter 4: The Gift of a Wonderful Counselor
Chapter 5: The Gift of Fear
Chapter 6: The Gift of Salvation
Chapter 7: The Gift of Fruitfulness
Chapter 8: The Gift of Warnings
Chapter 9: The Gift of Peace
Chapter 10: The Gift of Understanding
Chapter 11: The Gift of Sight
Chapter 12: The Gift of Nourishment
Chapter 13: The Gift of Strength in Affliction
Chapter 14: The Gift of True Truth
Chapter 15: The Gift of Freedom
Chapter 16: The Gift of Life
Chapter 17: The Gift of Joy
Chapter 18: The Gift of Wisdom
Chapter 19: The Gift of Righteousness
Chapter 20: The Gift of Hope

Epilogue: Opening the Gift

Bonus Material

Anizor ends each chapter with selections (not all the same length) from topically appropriate hymns. I’m unfamiliar with all those he picked, but they seemed to be good choices. There’s a concluding thought on the way to react to the chapter’s material. And there are some prayers for the reader’s use at the end of the book, as well.

Given the nature of the book as a devotional, these are all nice touches and help the project. I do wonder occasionally if those end-of-chapter suggested responses could’ve shown a little more trust for the reader, they seemed a little obvious.

So, what did I think about The Goodness of God in the Gift of Scripture?

My biggest problem with this book is self-inflicted. I didn’t do a thorough enough job of reading the description—the title refers to the “Gift of Scripture” and I focused on that over the part of the description, saying that each reading “focuses on an individual gift that God communicates through his word, such as warnings and wisdom that bring repentance. Readers will explore themes including righteousness, hope, freedom from shame, strength in affliction, and more.” Not that I have a problem with any of that—I absolutely do not. I just went into the book looking for material on the gift of Scripture, not the rest.

The book does an okay job of that frequently, but it’s not the overwhelming theme. It just makes the book feel unfocused. And the lack of focus hurts.

It’s a fine book, I liked the additional material at the end of the chapter and the Epilogue. I just think it could’ve been better—and if it focused on the theme as expressed in the title, I think it would’ve been that much stronger. Still, readers going into it for the right things—looking for what the book really is—will find themselves rewarded.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from Crossway via NetGalley in exchange for this post—thanks to both for this.


3 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.
Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Page 8 of 602

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén