Category: Mystery/Detective Fiction/Crime Fiction/Thriller Page 26 of 145

A Spoilery Rant about Robert B. Parker’s Revenge Tour by Mike Lupica

Okay, if you want to know what I thought about the novel as a whole, click here. Or scroll past this post to the next one. I keep a hard no-spoiler rule around here, but I had to get something off my chest…

Revenge TourRobert B. Parker’s Revenge Tour

by Mike Lupica

DETAILS:
Series: Sunny Randall, #10
Publisher: G.P. Putnam's Sons
Publication Date: May 2, 2022
Format: Hardcover
Length: 319 pg.
Read Date: May 9-10
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org


Seriously, don’t read on if you’re spoiler-phobic.

Robert B. Parker’s Revenge Tour by Mike Lupica: A Tale of Two Exes

Revenge TourRobert B. Parker’s Revenge Tour

by Mike Lupica

DETAILS:
Series: Sunny Randall, #10
Publisher: G.P. Putnam's Sons
Publication Date: May 2, 2022
Format: Hardcover
Length: 319 pg.
Read Date: May 9-10
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

What’s Revenge Tour About?

Back in book 3, Shrink Rap,* Sunny Randall helped protect best-selling author Melanie Joan Hall from her stalker ex-husband. He ended up in prison by the end and Melanie Joan and Sunny have remained close—Sunny has spent a few years living in her home, in fact, as Melanie Joan’s now based in California.

* Thanks to the magic of Fiction, that was 2002. I’m not exactly sure how few years are supposed to have passed between books 3 and 10, but I know it’s not 20.

Now she’s back in Boston, preparing to shoot a Netflix series based on her Romance series. She’s been wildly successful already, but this is set to make Melanie Joan Hall huge. Naturally, this kind of attention is bringing out enemies—including one who claims that the novel that started it all was plagiarized. Sunny needs to track down this anonymous accuser, quickly and quietly.

Meanwhile, Sunny’s dad, Phil, could use a little help. Years before he retired, he arrested the son of a prominent defense lawyer and helped ensure he served a long sentence. That son was just killed in prison, and the lawyer is harassing and threatening Phil. Sunny and Lee Farrell team up to help Phil.

Sunny gets some evidence that causes her to give credence to the claims against Melanie Joan, and their relationship is strained. Then people close to Melanie Joan start being murdered because Sunny doesn’t have enough going on. So, she has to clear Melanie Joan (or definitively establish her guilt), keep her safe, find out who is behind the plagiarism and/or murders, and keep her father alive while stopping this lawyer. Sunny’s going to need all her allies—and get a few new ones—to accomplish this To-Do list and get out of this alive.

The Two Exes

One of the people with the biggest grudges against Melanie Joan is her ex-husband, serving a life sentence for his crimes against Melanie Joan, Sunny, and Richie. Sunny travels to the prison to see if he might behind this all. In fact, he knows a disturbing amount about Melanie Joan, Sunny, Richie, Jesse Stone(!), and the threats against her father. I should probably mention that recently, Melvin was represented by the same lawyer currently harassing Phil.

I remember less than nothing about John Melvin—it’s probably been 15+ years since I re-read Shrink Rap last. But based on what Lupica does with him he’s easily in the top 5 creepiest characters in the Parkerverse. And Lupica uses him as much as he can in this book. (but wisely not over-much) Why is it psychologists make the best bad guys? (see also Thomas Harris, Dennis Lehane, and a couple of other examples that will pop into my mind about 30 seconds after I publish this but that I can’t think of now)

But before John Melvin, Melanie Joan had another husband—he was her writing professor in college (feel free to cringe at that, Sunny does). Melanie Joan credited Dr. Charles Hall with helping her get her first novel into shape. So if anyone’s going to be able to clear her from these charges—or condemn her—it’s going to be him. Sadly, he’s in poor health and suffering from some sort of dementia. His current spouse (another former student) can give Sunny some information, however.

I’ve Got a Beef

I think that Lupica makes a giant misstep in this book, but to talk about them would involve spoilers. If you’re curious, I’m going to post something separately about it so I can keep this post spoiler-free. If you’re not curious, I’m not sure I blame you.

So, what did I think about Revenge Tour?

Lupica threw everything he had into this last go-round with Sunny. Almost every character he’s used makes an appearance or gets their name used a couple of times—plus a few others from the Parkerverse. The story is more intricate than anything he’s given us thus far, too.

Aside from the spoiler stuff, I don’t have much to quibble with. I think I could’ve lived with fewer TV references, they seem out of place in this universe. One would be okay, but there are more than a few. I also think the Phil Randall story resolved too easily—but it helped set up the rest of the novel, so I can see why Lupica made the choice.

At the end of the day, I was really impressed with this one. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again—I think Lupica did a better job with Sunny than Robert B. Parker did, and this novel solidifies that. I’d be content with him writing this series for a decade, but I have high hopes for Alison Gaylin as she takes the reins.

If you’re even a casual reader of the Sunny Randall novels, this is one not to miss.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Tuesday Mooney Talks To Ghosts (Audiobook) by Kate Racculia, Lauren Fortgang: The Westing Game for Grownups (with a Supernatural Twist)

Tuesday Mooney Talks To GhostsTuesday Mooney Talks To Ghosts

by Kate Racculia, Lauren Fortgang (Narrator)

DETAILS:
Publisher: HarperAudio
Publication Date: October 17, 2019
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 14 hr., 6 min.
Read Date: April 28 - May 6, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

What’s Tuesday Mooney Talks To Ghosts About?

When Tuesday Mooney isn’t big on socializing—she seems to be a fantastic conversationalist, witty and smart—but she’d rather spend time on her own after work, with few exceptions. But even her best friend has to initiate conversations, she just doesn’t do that kind of thing. Tuesday is a researcher for a hospital charity—she knows Boston’s upper crust in ways few do. She has a well-documented dossier on them all and knows just how to get money out of them.

Tuesday has a neighbor, Dorry, who is an apprentice of sorts. Dorry’s a younger teen who lost her mother recently in an automobile accident. Her father is doing his best, but he can’t be everything she needs and provide for them. Dorry was fascinated by this woman in her building who wore black all the time and kept to herself. They run into each other one day and bond quickly. They soon have a weekly time together (“Tuesday Thursdays”) and Tuesday tutors Dorry in school—and important things like 1980’s-early 2000 music, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and The X-Files.

At a charity event Tuesday’s working at, a particular wealthy man—Vincent Pryce—dies shortly before Tuesday gets to meet him. Pryce rather enjoyed his coincidental name, and played into it. In addition to making gobs of money and doing a lot of charity work, he collected the macabre—particularly things associated with Edgar Allen Poe and that other Vincent. He was a bit of a showman and after his death, had arranged to announce sort of a giant scavenger hunt in the city—inviting individuals and teams to play along to be given the chance to become an heir.

Like many Bostonians, Tuesday and Dorry are intrigued. With some help from her neighbor, Tuesday pours her research strength into the project and leaps to an early lead—bringing along an old friend and a new ally (assuming she can trust him).

That’s really all I can say at this point—other than to throw in, that like Samuel Westing before him, Vincent Pryce has a hidden agenda to his game. As we watch Tuesday, Dorry, and so many others compete, secrets are revealed. (that’s a horribly inadequate way to say it, but I’m tripping over myself to avoid spoiling anything)

Conversing with Specters?

So how literal is this title? Does our titular protagonist chat with the spirits of the departed? Maybe.

The book will eventually take a position on the issue, but it’s going to take its time on it, letting the reader ponder that a bit. Now there are times when I want a book to be crystal clear—supernatural things happen, supernatural beings go around doing things. Or—supernatural things are mumbo jumbo. But every now and then I like a book that deals with the ambiguity well—Tuesday might be talking to ghosts, Tuesday might have a healthy and active imagination, Tuesday might be dealing with trauma. It might be all three and more.

Tuesday’s neighbor, Dorry has no idea about Tuesday and ghosts. But almost more than anything, Dorry wants to see and interact with the ghost of her mother. At one point, she discovers that among Pryce’s collection of oddities are a pair of glasses that can enable the wearer to see ghosts. This becomes her motivation for participating in the game—sure, money would be nice for college and to help her father—but those glasses…

How’s the Narration?

Lauren Fortgang was delightful. There was just something about the way she handled the narrative portions that made this a blast to listen to. Her character work—especially with Tuesday and Dorry—was great, too. There’s a certain sense of fun and play to the text, and she brought that out in a way that was particularly effective.

I enjoyed Fortgang’s work on the Dahlia Moss audiobooks, and I was glad to listen to her again—I think she did better here, for what it’s worth.

So, what did I think about Tuesday Mooney Talks To Ghosts?

I had so much fun listening to this—while doing so, things at work didn’t allow me as much time to listen as I’m accustomed to, so there was a bit of agony involved as the suspense built.

I barely described the characters, and had to leave off so many. But I just don’t have the space. Pryce’s widow, for example, is a wonderful character who should get her own novella to star in. Tuesday’s new ally is a mystery in himself—and won’t stop surprising you until the book is over. I could keep going here, but I won’t. I would love to have a long conversation with Racculia to talk about character design, more than most authors I’ve read recently. I’d love to know how she goes about it.

I’m not sure about the pacing of the whole thing, and I think there could’ve been one or two more moves in the game. But those issues really only occurred to me after I was done—in the moment, I was too busy enjoying myself to notice.

Tuesday Mooney Talks to Ghosts was a lot of fun to read, filled with characters I want to spend more time with—I really don’t need a story, maybe just see them sitting around a table talking about what’s going on in their lives. The novel is rarely what you think it is going to be—and not just at the beginning. I really enjoyed it.

3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions expressed are my own.

Force of Nature (Audiobook) by C.J. Box, David Chandler (Narrator): Wyoming Requiem

I’ve ended up working on this post a lot longer than most—definitely longer than any other book in this series. I know I didn’t say everything I wanted to, but I think I covered all the essentials. I also think my trimming ideas/paragraphs/rabbit trails didn’t make this too difficult to follow. Let me know if I missed that mark, will you?


Force of NatureForce of Nature

by C. J. Box, David Chandler (Narrator)

DETAILS:
Series: Joe Pickett, #12
Publisher: Recorded Books
Publication Date: March 20, 2012
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 11 hrs., 23 min.
Read Date: April 13-15, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

What’s Force of Nature About?

Nate Romanowski.

That’s the short version anyway—but it’s not a helpful answer.

Since we met Nate, we’ve known that he’s living off the grid for more than philosophical reasons—he’s not just a modern Thoreau, But we’ve never been given the story behind that. He’s offered to tell Joe, but Joe’s smart enough to know he shouldn’t know (but he is curious).

Well now, those people he’s been avoiding are getting close to finding him. They are approaching, questioning, kidnapping (if deemed necessary), and putting all other sorts of pressure on those who may know something about Nate or his whereabouts. This includes new characters as well as well-established characters—including all the Picketts, his friends on the reservation, his mysterious friends in Idaho, and others.

To protect those who are important to him, Nate has to stop hiding and go on the offense. Along the way, the reader gets answers to a lot of the questions about him that we’ve built up over the previous eleven novels.

We also get another lesson in watching out for your ears around Nate Romanowski, just in case Free Fire wasn’t enough for you.

Yes, there are several other things going on, but they all tie back to Nate Romanowski—his past, his present, and if he has a future.

A Gripe

This is semi-spoilery, but without this, I might have rated this higher, so I have to talk about it. I don’t think reading this is going to ruin anything plot-wise. Still, feel free to skip down to the next heading.

Nate, Joe, and Marybeth all agree that the Picketts have to get out of town for their own safety. So Joe, Marybeth, April, and Lucy get to the airport so they can get out of the reach of those who might try to use them to get to Nate.

See the problem there? I said nothing about Sheridan. Sure, she’s away at college, but we’re talking about people who have gone to Idaho and Colorado to find people to get leverage on Nate. Does anyone really think they can’t get to Laramie? Yes, Joe sends his FBI buddy to talk to her, but that’s to get information, not to watch out for her.

I literally kept talking back to the recording, “What about Sheridan?” Is it possible I missed the two sentences it would’ve taken for Box to justify this choice, but I don’t think that’s the case.

David Chandler

This is book 12, David Chandler has this series down—I’m sure he’s not on auto-pilot or anything, but at this point, it’s got to be comfortable for him.

That said, he’s on his game here, and really gets to stretch his wings a little—there’s (obviously) more Nate than usual, and Nate has a greater emotional range than usual, too. Bang-up job by Chandler.

So, what did I think about Force of Nature?

This is the most action-packed, violent, and unpredictable Joe Pickett novel yet. I’m not sure it’s even close—I’m not sure it’s the best novel in the series, but I’m guessing it’s quite the fan-favorite because of all the Nate material.

It’s the C.J. Box-equivalent of Robert Crais’ L.A. Requiem where we get all of Joe Pike’s background* in the midst of a gripping thrill ride. There’s a version of this post that contains several paragraphs comparing/contrasting these two novels that I’m sorely tempted to write, but I can’t imagine anyone wanting to read it all. This will both serve to humanize Nate as well as build up his mystique. A nice trick to be sure.

* I just got a very real lesson in careful typing by invoking Joe Pike in a discussion about a Joe Pickett novel.

Am I happy to have a lot of questions answered about Nate? Yes. Do I have a whole bunch of new questions about him? Yes. Do I sort of hope that he disappears for at least a book so we can refocus on Joe? Yes. Do I think that anyone with a mild interest in the Joe Pickett series will dig this novel? No doubt in my mind.


4 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Ordinary Grace by William Kent Krueger: A Summer In the Valley of the Shadow of Death

Ordinary GraceOrdinary Grace

by William Kent Krueger

DETAILS:
Publisher: Atria Books
Publication Date: March 26, 2013
Format: Hardcover
Length: 307 pg.
Read Date: April 19-20, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

All the dying that summer began with the death of a child, a boy with golden hair and thick glasses, killed on the railroad tracks outside New Bremen, Minnesota, sliced into pieces by a thousand tons of steel speeding across the prairie toward South Dakota. His name was Bobby Cole. He was a sweet-looking kid and by that I mean he had eyes that seemed full of dreaming and he wore a half smile as if he was just about to understand something you’d spent an hour trying to explain. I should have known him better, been a better friend. He lived not far from my house and we were the same age. But he was two years behind me in school and might have been held back even more except for the kindness of certain teachers. He was a small kid, a simple child, no match at all for the diesel-fed drive of a Union Pacific locomotive.

What’s Ordinary Grace About?

It’s the summer of 1961, and thirteen-year-old Frank and his younger brother, Jake, are going to be irrevocably changed over the next few months. Their small Minnesotan town of New Bremen, will be rocked by five deaths and some near-deaths, as well.

Frank and James live there with their older sister, Ariel—eighteen and about to leave their parents’ home. Nathan and Ruth married before Nathan went to serve in WWII—when he came home, he became a Methodist minister instead of the lawyer he’d planned on being before the war changed him. Ruth hasn’t entirely forgiven him for that but does her best to take part in congregational life, and to make do with his small salary.

Ariel is their golden child, Julliard-bound. Jake stutters, and is clearly fearful of almost everything—and everyone—around him, drawing what little confidence he has from his proximity to Frank. Frank is the family rebel—by most standards, he’s only slightly mischievous, but compared to the rest of the Drum family, he’s the equivalent of Bart Simpson.

The first death (see the quotation of the novel’s first paragraph, above) is that of someone that Frank and Jake knew–even played with. The boys discover the second body, a stranger to them. Those two are enough to alter the course of their development to a degree—but the next three (and the accompanying events) are what will leave an indelible mark on the entire family.

God’s Awful Grace

Krueger likes to use the phrase “the awful grace of God,” and makes other references to it, he wants that idea in your head as you read about the horrible things and deaths the reader and the characters encounter. You’re supposed to think about the (apparent) contrast between “awful” and “grace”, as well as catch the references to Aeschylus and Robert F. Kennedy (and, by extension, Martin Luther King’s death).

As far as the Aeschylus/RFK allusions go—yes, think about those. I think there’s a lot to chew on there. Sure Kennedy has yet to cite that poem, but the narrator has heard it–he’s writing from the perspective of four decades later.

But the former suggestion? I’m sure that Krueger, and many/most of his readers, know the phrase isn’t to evoke something extremely bad or shocking/saddening, but the archaic definition of awe-inspiring or enormous. But the reflex for contemporary readers isn’t to go with the lesser-known/used understanding but to think of the surface and the tension between the ideas, and it bothers me that we’re supposed to spend time on that understanding, even if it’s only a little bit. I’m not sure why it does, but it does.

But while I’m here on the subject of God’s grace, can I just say that the one sermon that we get all of from Nathan Drum, during the darkest part of this book, is one of the best I’ve read in a long time. Drum doesn’t understand grace the same way that RFK or Aeschylus does—grace to him is the unmerited sort, the kind that will come to someone in loss, in misery, in despair, and will cause them to believe, hope, and love. The book was worth the effort for this sermon alone, the rest is just gravy.

Krueger’s Prose

On the one hand, the prose is gorgeous—Krueger’s one of those authors that feels like he’s writing, perpetrating hooptedoodle. He breaks most of Leonard’s rules for writing all over the place, notably, “If it sounds like writing, I rewrite it.” But, as Leonard notes himself, there are authors who can skip them–Krueger’s one of those authors.

Still, there are a couple of things that got under my skin and would frequently take me out of the moment. For one, Krueger is sparing in his use of commas—a couple of times, I’d read a sentence out loud the way it’s in the book, and then with the missing commas; and I think I could get close to understanding why he made the choice. I didn’t agree, but I could maybe see what he’s going for.

But the thing that really bothered me was the dialogue. It really reads like someone wrote it, everyone (or almost everyone) is almost constantly sounding like they’re making a profound point about whatever. Particularly when it comes to Frank and his brother—I don’t need prepubescent boys uttering sentences with layers of meaning and dripping with wisdom nearly every time they say something.

That doesn’t mean that some of those sentences aren’t great and readable and even quotable. It just means it bothered me.

So, what did I think about Ordinary Grace?

“… He’s a vet. Korea. Had a tough time over there. It’s eating at him, I believe. He drinks. He’s hard on his family…”

“Sometimes, Nathan, I think it wasn’t as what we took into the war. Whatever cracks were already there the war forced apart, and what we might otherwise have kept inside came spilling out.”

Once I’d gotten on board with the hooptedoodle, I was able to appreciate what Krueger was about. This really brought Tiffany McDaniel’s The Summer That Melted Everything to mind (and Betty to a lesser extent). I also was reminded of Songs In Ordinary Time by Mary McGarry Morris, A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving, and early Richard Russo, as I read this. None of which would ever be considered for the Edgar, Anthony, Macavity, or Barry Awards like Ordinary Grace won. I know those awards mean I should think of this as a Mystery or Crime novel, but I just don’t. It fits with the others better, I think (but I do see why it won those).

It’s a book that will get its hooks into you, if you let it, just not the way that most Mystery novels do. It will make you think, it will make you feel, and it may cause you to think deeper (or more shallow, I suppose) thoughts about God and His grace. But mostly, it’ll make you think about humanity and many of the ways we can harm each other, intentionally or not.

I won’t say that I enjoyed 98% of this book—but the entire time I spent reading it I was fully aware that I was reading something of quality–something that deserved my attention, and I was glad to give it. I also had no trouble seeing why my friend recommended it to me–and I owe her a solid recommendation in return.


4 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

BOOK BLITZ: Dead Man’s Stone by TG Reid

This morning I’m pleased to host a Book Blitz for TG Reid’s Dead Man’s Stone—the third DCI Bone Scottish Crime Thriller—to celebrate its publication today. It looks like a heckuva ride.

Dead Man's Stone Blitz Banner

Book Details:

Book Title: Dead Man’s Stone by TG Reid
Series: DCI Bone Scottish Crime Thriller
Publisher: Glass Work Pres
Release date: April 20, 2022
Format: Ebook/Paperback
Length: 342 pages

Dead Man's Grave Cover

About the Book:

Some secrets are worth killing for.

When DCI Duncan Bone is contacted by a terminally-ill psychiatric patient and given clues linking a forty-year-old unsolved murder to high-profile public figures, he finds himself locked into a conspiracy at the very heart of the Scottish criminal and political establishment.

With his bosses stonewalling the investigation, lives under threat, and his career on the line, Bone faces a race against time to hunt down a group of men who will stop at nothing to cover their murderous crime.

Can DCI Bone catch the killer before the killing starts again?

Set among the dramatic hills and glens of Scotland’s Campsie Fells, Dead Man’s Stone is the third in a series of edge-of-your-seat crime thrillers that will keep you guessing right up to the nail-biting, heart-stopping climax.

Perfect for fans of Ian Rankin, J.D. Kirk, Val McDermid and Stuart MacBride.

 

Purchase Link:

Amazon UK ~ Amazon US

My thanks to Love Books Group for the invitation to participate in this Blitz.

Love Books Group

PUB DAY REPOST: Pay Dirt Road by Samantha Jayne Allen: A Tale of Oil, Murder, and Land

Pay Dirt RoadPay Dirt Road

by Samantha Jayne Allen

DETAILS:
Series: Annie McIntyre Mysteries, Volume 1
Publisher: Minotaur Books
Publication Date: April 19, 2022
Format: eARC
Length: 304 pg.
Read Date: March 21, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

What’s Pay Dirt Road About?

Annie just graduated from college and moves back to her hometown to decide her next move. That’s the generous way to look at it, anyway, we’ll get back to that in a bit. She’s waiting tables at a local diner—well, the local diner in Garnett, TX. It’s hard to say exactly how large Garnett is, but it’s not big. But given the nearby oil fields, there’s a lot of money as well as a lot of poverty in this smaller town.

Annie and her roommate/cousin spend a lot of their evenings drinking, frequently with others they graduated from high school with. One night they go to a bonfire at the home of one of Annie’s former classmates and unexpectedly run into a co-worker, Victoria. Victoria has overserved herself at this point and doesn’t show signs of slowing down. When Annie decides to leave, she tries to find Victoria but is told that she’s gone off with someone.

That’s the last anyone sees Victoria—the last anyone will admit to, anyway. Her body is found a few days later. Driven by guilt for abandoning her, Annie takes advantage of an offer from her grandfather—former sheriff, now a PI—to work for him and look into the case.

Annie

Annie is what many would call a deeply flawed character, but others would just say human. She’s trapped by her own insecurities as well as ego. She knows she could likely do well in law school—but it would be hard and risky. She could probably talk herself into the challenge, but failing means losing hope she could get away from Garnett, and I don’t think she’s willing to do that.

Like so many people in similar circumstances, not knowing what to do, she drinks, so she doesn’t have to think about it for a while. And drinks a lot. This wouldn’t be a big deal for me as a reader, but Annie spends a lot of time judging her grandfather for his drinking—especially when they’re supposed to be working. She doesn’t say anything to him, she just keeps it inside and lets herself indulge. It’s things like this that make her a wonderful, complex character.

The Sense of Place

I’m vague on a lot about the town of Garnett (size, demographics, etc.), but I also have some concrete visions of certain parts of it. It reminds me a lot of the TV version of Dillon, Texas—which seemed to change size, economic status, and makeup from week to week, depending on what the story called for.

As I type that, I realize that my ideas about Garnett are basically half-Samantha Jayne Allen/half-Friday Night Lights. Annie would basically fit in with the Tyra Colletes and Tim Riggins of the world, not the Jason Streets and Lyla Garritys (although we get glimpses of that part of Garnett, too). I just thought of three paragraphs I could do paralleling the worlds of these two fictional towns, so I’d better move on before this becomes a very different kind of post.

What I kept getting was a feel for the town more than anything—it’s the kind of place where the best and brightest leave after high school, and the big question is: will they come back? You get the impression that if they do, it’s not because they chose to—they either have no choice, or it’s just as a way station–like Annie intends. Some of those in the latter category end up sticking around, usually not by choice. This bleakness covers the whole of the novel—in the successes as well as the failures (and the in-between moments).

At the same time, it seems that few of these people are there by choice. It is their home. Up until two weeks before her death, Victoria had been tied to Garnett, but she had plans. Annie intends on leaving. But when it comes to the land of Garnett? Their families’ acres? There’s a reflexive, instinctive, and deep sense of possession and binding. Everyone knows that Annie’s going to leave town at some point—but when there’s a suggestion that someone is going to buy the land she’s set to eventually inherit? That sets an emotional fire in her that I think surprised even her. You see something similar with Victoria, too. People like them may not like Garnett, may not want to live there but it’s home. It’s their home, and will be.

So, what did I think about Pay Dirt Road?

I don’t know that I can say that I particularly enjoyed this book—by design, it’s not a good time. But it’s a great experience. Allen’s sense of character and sense of place ensures that the reader feels what’s going on. Particularly, but not limited to, Annie’s experiences.

Like with any good mystery—and look at character—Pay Dirt Road is as much about the investigation as it is the history of the characters—for Annie, this goes back to High School, for her family, the history we see goes back far before that. The past illumines the present, and helps the reader—and eventually, Annie and others—to see what’s going on in the present.

Last year, I finally got around to reading The Far Empty by J. Todd Scott. Garnett doesn’t have the same kind of corruption (at least that we see) going on, but it has the sense of setting, of bleakness, and dedication to place/city/home. Between these two books—not to mention Locke’s Bluebird, Bluebird and Kent’s The Dime—I’m starting to think I should focus more of my Crime reading on the Lone Star State.

This could be the beginning of a series—and if it is, I’ll be at the front of the line for the sequel. This could be a stand-alone, and if so, it leaves the characters in a good place—both in terms of closure and promise for the future. Either way, this is a book that’s going to linger in the back of my mind for a while, and I think that’ll be true for others.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from St. Martin’s Press via NetGalley in exchange for this post—thanks to both for this.


4 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

The Cutting Season by M. W. Craven: A Fast, Satisfying Read in this Dynamite Series

The Cutting SeasonThe Cutting Season

by M.W. Craven

DETAILS:
Series: Washington Poe, #3.5
Publisher: Constable
Publication Date: April 14, 2022
Format: Kindle Edition
Length: 105 pages
Read Date: April 15-16, 2022

What’s The Cutting Season About?

In lieu of writing a synopsis, how about the first four paragraphs?

It started with an old lady.

An old lady who had stepped in front of a train.

There were gangsters and bent cops and a contract killer called the Pale Man, but they were not as important as the old lady. And neither was the dead good man who turned out to be a dead bad man.

In the years that followed, some people would forget about the old lady. They would forget that, if it was not for her, none of this would have happened. Nobody would have been murdered. Nobody would have dangled from a meat hook in a cold warehouse. Nobody would have called in the Pale Man.

There you go—there’s murder, there’s drama in a warehouse, there’s a man known by a title, and a dead woman. There’s your hook. Add in a detective from the National Crime agency—Washington Poe, who’s called in to help with the murder investigation (although he usually investigates serial killers)—and his friend/colleague who is a wizard with tech—Tilly Bradshaw—and you’ve got yourself the makings of a great thriller.

Quick Reads

The Cutting Season was one of eight novellas published this year as part of The Reading Agency’s Quick Reads program.

Quick Reads provide a route into reading that prioritises great story telling and adult-focused content while ensuring the books are written in an accessible and easy to read style. The books are written by some of the most popular authors in the UK – including Andy McNab, Jojo Moyes, Anne Cleeves, Ian Rankin and Benjamin Zephaniah – so they can be a brilliant entry point to new genres, authors as well as the spark to reignite or build up the joy of reading.

The Quick Reads programme has collaborated with over 30 publishers to produce a total of 135 titles since 2006 (many still available to borrow from your public library or buy from The Reading Agency’s bookshop) with over 5 million copies distributed and over 6 million library loans.

That just sounds fantastic, doesn’t it?

So, what did I think about The Cutting Season?

This is a novella—short, sweet, to the point. Well, not that sweet—there’s a lot of dead people and threats to health and well-being. So it’s short and to the point. Think of it as a Washington Poe/Tilly Bradshaw novel in espresso form.

It’s got everything you want—a disturbing killing, Poe’s antics, Tilly saving the day—and as a nice bonus, there’s a chapter at the beginning where Poe is enjoying himself at the office with co-workers, so we get to see there’s more to him than just the single-visioned man we see when he’s on the case (a great way to introduce Poe and Tilly to new readers).

Given the streamlined way this story had to be told to fit, there weren’t any twists or nuance—for a 105-page novella, I’m fine with that. I think this’d work well to introduce Poe and Tilly to a reader who hasn’t done much in the genre before—and I could definitely see this convincing someone who really doesn’t read novels to give one in the series a shot.

As is to be expected from a M.W. Craven work, I strongly recommend this. I had a blast reading it, you will, too.


4 Stars

Nero Wolfe on Taxes

I can’t tell you when this became a (largely) annual thing for me to post, but it was on a blog that pre-existed this one. As always, seems like a good day to post it.

Nero Wolfe Back CoversA man condemning the income tax because of the annoyance it gives him or the expense it puts him to is merely a dog baring its teeth, and he forfeits the privileges of civilized discourse. But it is permissible to criticize it on other and impersonal grounds. A government, like an individual, spends money for any or all of three reasons: because it needs to, because it wants to, or simply because it has it to spend. The last is much the shabbiest. It is arguable, if not manifest, that a substantial proportion of this great spring flood of billions pouring into the Treasury will in effect get spent for that last shabby reason.

–Nero Wolfe
from And Be a Villain

20/20 (Audiobook) by Carl Goodman, Louise Brealy: A New DI Finds Herself in a Disturbing Investigation

20/2020/20

by Carl Goodman, Louise Brealey (Narrator)

DETAILS:
Series: DI Eva Harris, #1
Publisher: Audible Originals
Publication Date: June 4, 2020
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 13 hrs., 4 min.
Read Date: March 30-31, 2022

What’s 20/20 About?

So you know how in most police procedurals, the protagonist detective(s) is helped out by a super-geek (usually, but not always, a female) who befuddles the Luddites/barely-computer literate detectives with what they can do? Well, Carl Goodman’s DI Eva Harris is the super-geek who is also the protagonist detective in the best kind of a 2-for-1 deal.

Harris is driven, she knows she’s good with computers—a real rival (if not a flat-out superior) to all kinds of cyber-criminals. But the only way for her to advance in the police services is to spend time being a non-cyber officer, out on the streets, working with other detectives for two years. Which is both hard to believe, and completely believable (if anyone knows how legitimate that is, please let me know).

On her first day as a DI in the Surrey Police, she’s summoned to a crime scene before she can even introduce herself to anyone. A woman has been murdered—meticulously exsanguinated, with her eyes meticulously removed. I stress the meticulousness there because this is a very clean crime scene that is going to be forensically unhelpful (if not worse).

And then more bodies show up. There’s a similarity here to a serial killer’s M.O., but that killer wasn’t careful about the crime scenes. Is this the same killer, who has taken the time and effort to refine his method? A copycat? Someone who just seems similar to the serial killer? That’s for DI Harris and her new team to ascertain.

If that’s not enough, part of the reason Harris has been assigned to this command is that she’s being forced by the Intelligence Services to look into corruption at her new HQ. And some skeletons from her past are coming back to haunt her.

How’s the Narration?

Brealey nailed this—she captures Harris’ analytical approach, the distance she’s keeping from her team and the assignment—and then how that distance crumbles—and general unease with some aspects of the assignment. She also does a great job portraying the rest of the cast, and the unexpected attitudes from some of the suspects.

I’m seeing a lot of negative reviews of her work on Audible and Goodreads. I don’t get it—I can see where she might be everyone’s cup of tea (who is?), but I don’t get the negativity. I thought she did exactly what this book needed.

So, what did I think about 20/20?

This was an intense, multi-layered, unnerving, and tough-to-predict police procedural with a little something extra going on. Maybe too much—just maybe.

I think I could’ve lived without the whole Harris investigates her own team aspect of the novel (although, that would have cost the novel some great scenes). The novel might have been a little stronger had it stayed focused on the killings with Harris’ past as the only subplot. It’s hard to judge things like that, so I could be completely wrong.

I cannot stress enough that some of these murders are pretty disturbing and that there is no way I ever want Carl Goodman mad at me. The way he describes murder scenes and artwork, in particular, is really impressive—there’s a lot of narrative and description that’s really impressive, but those really jumped out at me. I could “see” those very clearly.

I sussed out the 2 of the 3 main mysteries early on—that’s fine, it’s not a whodunit kind of read, it’s about Harris getting the answers and what she has to go through for that. As such, it’s a winner—she’s a fish out of water in several ways (geographic, social, vocational, for starters) and that’s the focus of the book. Still doesn’t make it less satisfying when I found out I was right. Also, I really don’t want to live in a world where the motives for the killings are plausible. Sadly, I absolutely believe them.

It’s a gripping listen, and I think you’ll be glad you gave it a shot. There’s a sequel, too—I don’t think it’ll be long before I dive into that.


3.5 Stars

Page 26 of 145

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén