Tag: Ed Duncan

A Few Quick Questions With…Ed Duncan

Earlier this morning, I gave my take on Ed Duncan’s Pigeon-Blood Red (and it occurs to me that I didn’t explain that interesting title choice–one more reason for you to listen to/read it). Now I get to share a quick Q&A that Duncan was kind enough to make time for. I hope you enjoy this as I did!


Why don’t you introduce yourself to my audience, and talk about what led to you writing thrillers—has this been a plan for a while, and post-retirement you had time for it? Or is this a later-in-life choice?
I have enjoyed writing since English composition days in high school.  I always planned to write a novel when I got the chance, but I never found time until after a career of practicing law.  Along the way, in 2008 I wrote a legal treatise entitled Ohio Insurance Coverage, which I updated annually through 2012, the year I retired.

I read The Maltese Falcon by Dashiell Hammett as an adult and was so taken by it that I decided that crime fiction would be my genre.  Indeed, I still find inspiration in Hammett’s masterful dialogue, much of which is reproduced almost word for word in the last movie version of the novel written and directed by John Huston.  For example, there is this:

Spade to Wunderle:

I’m going to send you over.  The chances are you’ll get off with life.  That means you’ll be out again in twenty years.  You’re an angel.  I’ll wait for you…. If they hang you I’ll always   remember you.

 

Later he tells her:

Don’t be silly.  You’re taking the fall.  One of us has got to take it …. They’d hang me sure.  You’re likely to get a better break….

 

Still later Spade says to her:

I don’t care who loves who.  I’m not going to play the sap for you.  I won’t walk in Thursby’s and Christ knows who else’s footsteps.  You killed Miles and you’re going over for it.

 

For you –at least when it came to Pigeon-Blood Red – what came first? Rico, or one of the other characters, and you had to come up with a story to put them into; or was it a story that you needed to populate?
You have hit upon something here because the two alternatives you present are closely related.  Because the two main characters in this story come from such different worlds, and yet would be interacting together, before I could begin to write, I had to imagine a plot line in which they could believably exist and interact together.  In other words, I had to come up with a story that brought a lawyer from a big corporate law firm together with a hit man for more than a fleeting instant.  And, because I’ve written a trilogy, I had to do it three times!  I think I mostly succeeded but not with everyone.  For instance, despite giving me an overall positive review, a recent reviewer called the storyline in Pigeon-Blood Red “absurd.”  The foregoing notwithstanding, I already knew who Rico and Paul were, which is to say, what kind of man each was and what each would find that was positive about the other’s character, however reluctantly.  I just needed interesting supporting characters and an intriguing crime to bring them and everyone else together.

There are a lot of balls in the air at once here – how do you approach something like this – did you write a character/group of character’s arc at a time and then layered them together?  And was getting all the ducks to line up in a row just right enough to make you think of writing a sequel to Ohio Insurance Coverage instead?
First, there was never a possibility that I would write a sequel to Ohio Insurance Coverage.  That legal treatise and its annual supplements was a project that I happily bequeathed to another lawyer in my old law firm after I retired in 2012.  You are correct, however, that for such a slender novel, there are a lot of balls in the air.  Writing it chronologically helped me to keep each of those balls in the air.  However, I did write chapter one out of order both so that I could start the novel with a bang, so to speak, and so that I could introduce the reader to two warring sides to Rico’s complex personality: his inability to recognize his cruelty toward his own girlfriend when he believes it is required by “business” and the pleasure he gets out of turning the tables on a husband who is bullying his wife.

There were some great characters in here—and most of them weren’t who I expected to find when I started the book. What was the bigger challenge—getting these people to live and breathe in a way that was satisfying to you (and the reader) or getting the action/plot just right?
Again, both challenges were related and almost equally formidable.  I needed to construct a story that was dramatic and exciting and yet believable.  While in general that is the challenge of almost any writer of fiction, and in particular it is the challenge of any writer of crime novels, the task is made more difficult if the story is implausible.  So, while it was a close call, getting the action/plot right was more of a challenge.

What lessons were you able to take from finishing Pigeon-Blood Red to make The Last Straw  easier—or was it such a different animal that you were back to Square One?
There is a famous writer’s quote that is often attributed to Ernest Hemingway but whose author is probably unknown.  I learned how true the quote was when I wrote Pigeon-Blood Red and it was no less true when I wrote the other novels in my trilogy.  Thus, it is the lesson I was able to take from finishing each novel.  Unfortunately, it did not make writing either the second or the third novel easier.  Here is the quote: “Writing is easy.  All you have to do is sit down in front of a blank sheet of paper and open a vein.”

Who are some of your major influences? (whether or not you think those influences can be seen in your work — you know they’re there)
I think Dashiell Hammett and Lee Child are my major influences.  Others include Walter Mosley and Frederick Forsythe.

Is there a genre that you particularly enjoy reading, but could never write? Or are you primarily a mystery/suspense/thriller reader?
Duke Ellington once said, “There are only two kinds of music:  good music and bad music.”*  I feel the same way about writing.  Therefore, I enjoy reading in every genre, but I particularly enjoy histories of the Civil War and its Generals, histories of World War II, biographies, and literary fiction.  I may take a crack at literary fiction one day, but I could never write in any of the other genres.

* I thought it was Country and Western. Guess you learn something every day.

What’s next for Ed Duncan, author?
I would like to write a fourth installment in the adventures of Rico and Paul and Jean and Evelyn.  Then I would like to write that literary novel.  I hope I get to both.

Thanks for your time and participation–and for this entertaining listen!
Thanks for your interest. You posed some intriguing questions.


A Few Quick Questions

Pigeon-Blood Red (Audiobook) Ed Duncan, read by Dave Keyser: No Muss, No Fuss, Just a Solid Thriller

Be sure to come back in a couple of hours to read a Q&A with the author, Ed Duncan.


Cover of Pigeon-Blood Red by Ed DuncanPigeon-Blood Red

by Ed Duncan, read by Dave Keyser

DETAILS:
Series: Pigeon-Blood Red, Book 1
Publisher: Next Chapter Audio LTD
Publication Date: September 2, 2022
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 5 hr., 59 min.
Read Date: October 28, 2024

A Quick Word

You should’ve read this in early November. But communication errors, busy schedules, and (I’m assuming) life in general got in the way of both Mr. Duncan and myself. And I feel bad about my part in that. Thought I’d take a moment up front to issue an apology to Mr. Duncan and his publicist.

What’s Pigeon-Blood Red About?

Stop me if you’ve heard this before, but a grizzled enforcer and his partner make a mistake that leads to a panicky guy stealing from their boss. This guy, Robert, is already in some serious debt to their boss, Litvak, and this just makes it worse—especially when Robert leaves town suddenly and tries to use the theft to leverage Litvak into writing off the debt. Litvak doesn’t like this idea, and sends the enforcer, Rico, to track down Robert, deal out some punishment, and come back with at least the stolen item—and maybe more.

Yeah, this feels incredibly familiar—which is not a deal-breaker at all, it just makes it easy for the reader/listener to get into the story. As always, it’s what the author does with a familiar set-up that makes it worth the ride. And Duncan doesn’t disappoint there.

That largely has to do with other people that Rico and Robert encounter along the way—some of whom get swept up in Rober’s foolhardy and desperate moves and find themselves in Rico’s cross-hairs when they’re just trying to live their lives. But you should learn about them for yourselves.

Some of These People are the Worst

Seriously, you can hear Jean-Ralphio singing it as you think of some of these people. I’m not even talking about the hitman here—but some of his targets. Okay, his boss isn’t that great, either. But he’s supposed to be a morally bankrupt scoundrel. The more we get to know—and the more we see from—Robert and some others and you can’t help but wonder if the world will be a better place without them.

I will say that it took me a little longer to warm up to Rico than is usual in this type of book. Our introduction to the character—the first real thing we see from him—really made it hard for me to want anything more than to see Litvak put him in a hole somewhere, but that changed.

How Was the Narration?

My initial reaction to the thought was “absolutely fine,” and I was prepared to move on. However brief that answer was.

But Keyser deserves a little more than that, I think. He really was a great match for this material—I wish I could find other audiobook credits for him to see how he does with other genres (and am a little discouraged to see that he’s not attached to the rest of this trilogy). He could handle the lighter moments–the sweet moments–as well as the not-even-close-to-sweet moments when bullets are flying equally well (and we’ve all heard narrators that can’t quite pull that off in the same book).

I really enjoyed his work and think he made a series of really smart choices and executed them well.

So, what did I think about Pigeon-Blood Red?

After various and sundry delays, it was hard for me to remember some details that I wanted to, so I listened to a few bits again—and I really had a hard time forcing myself not to just listen to the whole book again (if I had one more day on a Libby book, I probably would’ve indulged myself). I think that says plenty about this book.

Duncan assembled this particular book very well, there were a lot of moving pieces—and plenty of backstories to bring in—and he managed to keep the reader engaged with all the characters while maintaining the pace and building the tension. I really admired that–in a longer book that might have been easier, actually, but this is a quick listen and to cram as much in as he does is no mean feat (and it never feels crowded, crammed, or rushed).

There’s a scene that I’ve spent some time thinking about again and again since I listened to this–it’s a pivotal scene toward the end. It could be a scene from a farce—it’s full of mistaken identities, close calls, crazy chains of events, and so on. You add a jaunty, bouncy soundtrack and an exaggerated facial expression or two, and it could be seen as comical. If you ignore the blood, terror, and death, that is. I could see it all very clearly in my mind, and I think Duncan faked me out a little bit (see: mistaken identities). Duncan and Keyser both were spot-on during this scene/sequence and earned a lot of trust from me there.

I found something to like in all the primary characters, (other than Robert and unnamed persons from the above section), and got invested in the outcomes surrounding them. By the end of the book, I wasn’t actually sure what character(s) the trilogy would follow and could see myself signing on to whatever ones Duncan stuck with. I was pretty sure it’d be Rico—and the title of the third book, Rico Stays gives it away. But that I’d have been open to some others, I think tells you a lot.

Was this a book that ever really blew me away? I don’t think so—but I was engaged and entertained through it all. It was entirely satisfying (if you ignore the bump with Rico in the beginning, but I got over it). And now that I’ve finished this post, I can get to listen to the rest of the trilogy in short order. Be prepared to sign on to a trilogy if you start this (a quick-moving trilogy, I should stress).

Disclaimer: I received a copy of this audiobook from the author and Kelsey Butts at Book Publicity Services. Other than giving me something to opine about, this did not influence my opinion which is honestly reflected above.

Irresponsible Reader Pilcrow Icon

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén