![]()
Category: News/Misc. Page 106 of 229
The friendly and talented people over at Siege Media dropped by the other day with another great infographic. Check out the nice intro they provided and then the infographicgraphic. I’m going to be trying these myself.

It can be easy to get lost in a good read—laying on your couch, bed, or in your reading nook for hours at a time because the book is just too good to put down. Then, you get up and wonder where the time went. Instead of lounging while you read, why not exercise, too? Reading is the perfect activity to engage your mind while also engaging those muscles!
Here are a few workouts you can try while reading a book that supports your mental and physical fitness.
1. Literature Leg Raises
You can still relax from your couch or bed while feeling the burn of these literature leg raises. Get comfy in your favorite pair of yoga leggings, grab your favorite book and lay back for a workout that targets your abs and core.
To start, lie down on your back while holding your book with both hands in front of you. Keep your legs straight and lift them toward the ceiling. Then, slowly bring them back down while keeping your core engaged. Repeat this for four sets of 10 to 12 reps or until you feel a good burn.
2. Trilogy Treadmill Walk
One of the easiest ways to work out while reading is to prop your book right up on the treadmill while you walk. Whether you’ve got your treadmill in your home library or you’re heading to the gym, walking on the treadmill helps target your quads, hamstrings, glutes and calves and can be a great way to relieve the stress of the day.
Begin by placing your book on the treadmill so it’s directly in front of you. Then, start walking at a speed that’s manageable for you. Once you’re warmed up, increase the incline level for an added burn. Walk for about 30 minutes or make a goal to walk until you’ve read a certain amount of pages or chapters. For example, walk until you’ve read 5 chapters or 100 pages.
3. Page Turner Planks
Planks are great for targeting your core and lower back and the burn won’t feel so bad if you’ve got a good book to keep you occupied. Begin in a push-up position with your book on the floor. Then, lower yourself onto your forearms. Tighten and engage your abs and core and hold for 30 to 60 seconds, or until you’ve made your page or chapter goal.
To find out the rest of the seven exercises you can do while reading a book, check out the infographic below.
![]()

As I started this, I realized that there was no way that I’m going to be able to say everything I want to say now, so I guess this is going to have to be a series. I have no idea how long this series is going to be, and really where I’m going to go next, but I’m looking forward to finding out. This also gives me some wiggle room to improve this, after re-writing bits of this for a couple of weeks, it’s a strong entry in the “perfection is the enemy of good” category. I’m just going to post this today, or I’ll never finish it
A couple of weeks ago, as happens to even the most well-intentioned introverts, I met someone new. The one thing he knew about me going into this conversation was that I read a lot. Early on in our very entertaining conversation, he asked me the question, “What makes for a good book?”
We didn’t get far on that topic, sadly. I mentioned a couple of books to illustrate my first point and we went off on a tangent discussing one of those books. Which led to talking about another book and another, and then I don’t know, board games and another round for all of us at the table? And the question that sparked it all was lost.
The abandoned conversation has been percolating in my mind since then, so I’ve got to get some of it on paper.
Off the top of my head, there are four things that make a good book (I’m talking fiction here, there’s probably another list for me to make regarding Non-Fiction).
- I need a character or two that I can like/get invested in. That’s not to say they need to be likable characters, see Hannibal Lecter or Sand dan Glokta (or, just about anyone from The First Law trilogy).
- An engaging plot—sure, there are only 7 or whatever your favorite expert says, but I need one or more of them mixed well.
- A world I can dig into and believe—it doesn’t have to be a full-on bit of world-building like a Temerant or a Terminus. It can be Rebus’ Edinburgh, Bernadette Fox’s Seattle, or Walt Longmire’s Absaroka County. A place I can believe the characters live, breathe, and act in certain ways, where the plot can happen.
- This is the intangible one and the most concrete…the writing. I’m talking about the mechanics, the voice, the tone, the pacing, vocabulary, the technical bits. How does the writer deliver the other 3 aspects to the reader?
I guess I kind of see these as ranges—0 to 100, for lack of a better way of putting it. Any book worth reading will deliver all of these four points—not equally well. Some will have a great character, mediocre plot, and pay no attention to the world. That might still be a book worth reading—especially if they handle #4 well. It might even be a book that I’d relish recommending. But a great read is going do well on at least three of those—and a great one is going to knock it out of the park on all four.
Number 1 is my favorite and is the most reliable indicator (for me) of whether I’m going to enjoy a novel. Yes, it’s possible that I can not enjoy most/all of the characters and yet enjoy a novel if the author is good at most of the other aspects, but it’s not a given.
#2 is the least important to me—especially if the writer nails #1 and #4. But someone who masters it will make me forget about a lousy protagonist/antagonist or a dull style.
I think #3 is the hardest to be great at—I remember reading somewhere that the guitar is the easiest instrument to be competent at, and one of the hardest to master (or words to that effect). I think #3 is the guitar of novel writing.
#4 is the most vital—it can elevate any of the other 3—in fact, they can fool you into thinking an author has given you a great character, when they’ve really delivered something fairly two-dimensional, but describe them with such panache that you don’t notice. Another way to put it is that it will mask or augment the other three.
I think this’ll do for a start. I’m going to go deeper into each of these aspects in the entries to come (hopefully on a semi-regular schedule).
![]()
As I sat down to write posts for today last night, I kept getting distracted by Primary Election results—in Idaho, for good or ill, the Republican Primary election is more important than the General Election in November—state races are all but certain after it. So for every half-sentence I write, I end up spending 5 minutes looking at numbers—who knows what I’ll get written for today. At the very least, I cobbled together a WWW Wednesday.
This meme was formerly hosted by MizB at A Daily Rhythm and revived on Taking on a World of Words—and shown to me by Aurore-Anne-Chehoke at Diary-of-a-black-city-girl.
The Three Ws are:
What are you currently reading?
What did you recently finish reading?
What do you think you’ll read next?
Easy enough, right?
What are you currently reading?
I’m reading the fantasy novel The Traitor’s Heir by Anna Thayer and am listening to the very amusing This Is Going to Hurt: Secret Diaries of a Young Doctor by Adam Kay on audiobook.
What did you recently finish reading?
I grabbed the wrong book off the shelf last week, so the last book I finished was J.C. Jackson’s Conjured Defense and yesterday I finished Nothing to See Here by Kevin Wilson, Marin Ireland (Narrator) on audio.
What do you think you’ll read next?
My next book should be the UF short story collection, Heroic Hearts edited by Jim Butcher and Kerrie Hughes, and my next audiobook should be Magic Kingdom for Sale–Sold! by Terry Brooks, Jeremy Arthur (Narrator). I read that a few dozen times in the last century, and figured it was time to revisit.
Hopefully, you’re not as distracted as I am (unless you want to be)—what are you reading?
![]()
This prompt was submitted by Heather @ MM Romance Reviewed:
Do you post negative reviews?*
* I don’t see 99% of what I post about books here as a “review.” I still see Reviews as something that a professional does, in a professional manner. I’m an amateur who writes in a very casual manner. But I know I’m pretty much alone in this point of view, so for the sake of this post, I’ll use the commonly accepted usage.
There are books that are bad. Those need to be recognized as such. There are books that don’t appeal to a reader for whatever reason. Those should be acknowledged and discussed—hopefully with an eye to the positive as well as the negative. It’s okay not to like things. I personally think it’s a little strange how much some people enjoy not liking things, but that’s not for me to judge. I tend to prefer liking books, life is more enjoyable that way. But sometimes I just can’t. And that’s good. That’s the way it ought to be in this world of differences.
If I invest the time to read something, then you’d better believe I’m going to write about it—I need stuff to write about to keep this thing going.
Less pragmatically, I write to help me think about a book–and if those thoughts end up in a negative place, then I’m going to write a negative post.
But more importantly, if readers of my posts are to take me seriously when I say, “I think this is good,” or “I recommend it.” They should know that there are things I don’t think are good, things I don’t recommend. It’s easier to gauge how much weight to give a positive take on a book when you know how they react dimly to something.
Sure, I get that some bloggers don’t want to do anything negative—either because they’re inherently or deliberately encouraging, they think there’s too much negativity in the world already, or they’re firmly in the “if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all” camp.* I get it, I understand it, and support their decision. Still, when deciding if I’m going to read a book I’m on the fence on, they’re not likely to sway me.
* Back on my personal blog years before I started this one, I posted a response to the Spider-Man “One More Day” storyline that consisted of 3 pages of line breaks to make it very clear how much there was that I couldn’t say anything about. Sticking to the letter of the law, but trashing the spirit.
And, as almost always comes up in a discussion like this—sometimes someone will read a negative post that I or someone else writes and say, “I can see where they might not like X, but it sounds interesting to me.” I know I’ve read books that other bloggers have trashed because of something they said.
Do you promote those reviews if you post?
I’m not sure that I promote posts at all—I know I ignore Facebook’s repeated suggestions to pay for promotion. Do I share them on social media sites? Sure–I tweet the links and post them on Facebook. I post the reviews to Goodreads, StoryGraph, Hardcover, LibraryThing, and whatever other bookish sites I’m using/trying. If that counts as promotion, then yes I do. Why wouldn’t I?
What about you?
![]()
Without really intending to, my wife and I have apparently started a collection of dragon figures on books (I know I should more properly call them bookwyrms). One day I’ll take and post some good pictures of them, but today is not that day. I need a name for one of them–we’re a little tired of saying, “that red one we got in Lincoln City.” So, hive mind: suggestions? I tend to prefer something faux-Latin.
Odds ‘n ends about books and reading that caught my eye this week. You’ve probably seen some/most/all of them, but just in case:
A school district in my town this week ignored their book review procedures and voted to ban “forever” over twenty books–go ahead and do that if you must, but do it right (and “forever”, really?). Raise a hullabaloo about Banned Books, the expected groups in the area are responding.
Upset by book bans, teen starts forbidden book club in small Pa. town
Leah Jeffries is Annabeth Chase—Rick Riordan is not pleased with some online reaction to the cast announcement for the Percy Jackson show and takes a firm stand.
Q&A with Jackson Ford, author of The Frost Files—to commemorate the publication of the 4th Frost Files novel this week.
Does genre matter?: When rules help and when they hinder, and how the editing process shapes genre.—One writer’s take on genre, I’d be curious to see how others approach this.
All Possible Plots by Major Authors—you’ll get at least two grins from this list (probably more)
How to have a comfortable read in bed—this piece from the Guaridan in 1978 holds up pretty well
What a Hobby Feels Like—this isn’t about reading/books/etc. per se, but it’s a good piece and I think some of it applies.
Thoughts on returning to book blogging.—were I to step away from this, I’d imagine I’d feel many of the same things
Do I stand by my old reviews? Looking back on SEVEN YEARS of book blogging!—This is a brave idea.
Other Bloggers Talk About 458% Traffic Increase… I’ve Yet To Get That—Pass Me That Book talks about traffic
Lie About Your Age, Not About Reading Books

This Week’s New Releases that I’m Excited About and/or You’ll Probably See Here Soon:
Crazy in Poughkeepsie by Daniel Pinkwater—I haven’t bought/read a Pinkwater book since the 80s, but I’ve been seeing advertisements for this everywhere, I’m going to have to give it a shot.
A Sh*tload of Crazy Powers by Jackson Ford—Teagan Frost is back, what more needs to be said?
This is a weekly bloghop hosted by Freda’s Voice.
RULES:
Grab a book, any book.
Turn to Page 56 or 56% on your ereader. If you have to improvise, that is okay.
Find a snippet, short and sweet.
Post it.

from Page 56 of:

Right Behind Her by Melinda Leigh
“I can’t decide if he’s a great actor or truly impulsive. Did he insult that man thinking he could get away with it here?”
“No.” Matt considered Shawn’s expression after the fight. “He wanted that fight. The big guy reacted exactly the way Shawn intended.”
Bree frowned. “Why? Why would he want to get the hell beaten out of him?”
“By going to the ER, he avoided spending a night in jail.”
Bree sat back.
Matt continued. “He looked pleased with himself.”
![]()
It’s the middle of the week, the day where I figure out just where I am and what I’m doing next and tell you about it. It’s a good exercise and for at least 15 minutes I feel like I have a handle on things. It’s a little thing I like to call WWW Wednesday! (I like to call it that because that’s its name, I’m funny that way)
This meme was formerly hosted by MizB at A Daily Rhythm and revived on Taking on a World of Words—and shown to me by Aurore-Anne-Chehoke at Diary-of-a-black-city-girl.
The Three Ws are:
What are you currently reading?
What did you recently finish reading?
What do you think you’ll read next?
Easy enough, right?
What are you currently reading?
I’m reading the fourth Bree Taggert novel, Right Behind Her by Melinda Leigh, and I’m listening to the disturbing Limelight by Carl Goodman, Louise Brealey (Narrator) on audiobook.
What did you recently finish reading?
Yesterday, I finished Mike Lupica’s Robert B. Parker’s Revenge Tour, which was more than I hoped, and Funny Farm: My Unexpected Life with 600 Rescue Animals by Laurie Zaleski, Erin Moon (Narrator) on audio, which was not at all what I expected.
What do you think you’ll read next?
My next book should be The Traitor’s Heir by Anna Thayer, for that 12 Books Challenge. My next audiobook should be Nothing to See Here by Kevin Wilson, Marin Ireland (Narrator), something I’ve been thinking about for a while.
And what about you?
![]()
Today’s one of those days where I open MyPocket and look at what I have for this Miscellany and wondered if I actually went online at all this week. I don’t think that’s because I’m making healthy choices or anything, just a sign that I was as busy this week as it felt like I was. Two small miscellanies in a row.
Also, happy Free Comic Book Day to those who observe.
Odds ‘n ends about books and reading that caught my eye this week. You’ve probably seen some/most/all of them, but just in case:
Announcing 20 Books of Summer ’22—phew…I already have 2 draft-lists for this. Glad Cathy’s doing this again, I’ve enjoyed it.
What Goes Into a Book’s Appearance?—it’s been too long since I’ve had something along these lines to share
Interview With Author Ben Aaronovich
Opinions: Plagiarising Book Reviews is Weird—This is a thing? I mean, of course this is a thing, our world is a dumpster fire and everything stupid and wrong is a thing…but really? This?
In Praise of Mythopoeic Fantasy—A good post, but worth the click anyway for the excuse to say “mythopoeic” a few times.
Where to buy books other than Amazon (and for cheaper)—I meant to share this a month ago, better late than never…
Getting Started in Superhero Fiction—seems appropriate for today…I’ve dipped my toe in at least a few of these. Good place to start, if you’re someone who digs the genre.

This Week’s New Releases that I’m Excited About and/or You’ll Probably See Here Soon:
Of Claws and Fangs by Faith Hunter—Vignettes, short stories, and a novella from the Jane Yellowrock/Soulwood universe. I said some complimentary things about it on Monday.
Robert B. Parker’s Revenge Tour by Mike Lupica—Lupica and Sunny are back for another adventure. I’ve like Lupica’s Sunny novels more than most of Parker’s, it’s bugging me that I haven’t been able to open this yet.

Lastly, I’d like to say hi and extend a warm welcome to A.B. Finlayson, Gottfried, and blackwings666 who followed the blog this week.

This is a weekly bloghop hosted by Freda’s Voice.
RULES:
Grab a book, any book.
Turn to Page 56 or 56% on your ereader. If you have to improvise, that is okay.
Find a snippet, short and sweet.
Post it.

from Page 56 of:

The Cartographers by Peng Shepherd
<it’s me. I know it’s been a long time,> she had written and deleted about fifty times. Finally, she just sent:
<Dr. Young died.>
Then:
<Swann asked me for help. I know I have no right, but it’s in your specialty, Just one last favor.>
She didn’t even know for sure if he had the same number. But a few long minutes later, her phone buzzed.
<I can stop by tonight.> Then: <For Swann.>
![]()



















