WWW Wednesday, April 19, 2023

I have nothing to ramble on about here at the beginning of this post (I’m sure you’re all relieved)…let’s get right to the WWW of it all.

This meme was formerly hosted by MizB at A Daily Rhythm and revived on Taking on a World of Words—and shown to me by Aurore-Anne-Chehoke at Diary-of-a-black-city-girl.

The Three Ws are:

What are you currently reading?
What did you recently finish reading?
What do you think you’ll read next?

Easy enough, right?

What are you currently reading?

I’m slowly working and thinking my way through Kneading Journalism by Tony Ganzer. I just started Swamp Story by Dave Barry (which will probably not involve much thinking, but a lot of laughter). I should be wrapping up The Mostly True Story of Tanner & Louise by Colleen Oakley, Hillary Huber (Narrator) on audiobook, and I’m still trying to figure out what I think about it (but it’s generally positive).

Kneading JournalismBlank SpaceSwamp StoryBlank SpaceThe Mostly True Story of Tanner & Louise

What did you recently finish reading?

I just finished the compelling Larry Beinhart’s The Deal Goes Down and the utterly adequate Charlie Thorne and the Last Equation by Stuart Gibbs, Emily Woo Zeller (Narrator) on audio.

The Deal Goes DownBlank SpaceCharlie Thorne and the Last Equation

What do you think you’ll read next?

My next book should be the promising-looking Chain Gang All Stars by Nana Kwame Adjei-Brenyah. My next audiobook should be a Kenzie and Gennaro novel that I’m fairly ambiguous about, Sacred by Dennis Lehane, Jonathan Davis (Narrator).

Chain Gang All StarsBlank SpaceSacred

Are you working your way through anything good, compelling, or just vaguely interesting?

That’s Some Streak!

730 Day Streak
I tried to work in a Ray Stevens joke, but I think most of my readers are too young for it. And even if you aren’t too young, do you really want to get that song stuck in your head? (oh, I did that already? Whoops.)

For most of the life of this blog, I’ve struggled to get 4-6 posts up a week. The goal was always 6, but sometimes I’d have to settle for two. Sure, I’d occasionally get 8 or 9 days in a row, but that was about it.

Then in 2021, I got a notification that I’d posted something here for like 50 days in a row—without trying or noticing. That seemed pretty cool, so I thought I’d see if I could go for 100 days in a row. And then I’d take a couple of days off. But then I got the 100-day notification and decided to go for 200, I was liking this challenge.

Once I hit 200, I didn’t even bother shooting for 300—I had to go for a year. And then once I got there (actually, it was a couple of days afterward—I don’t think I saw the year mark), I figured it could be fun to go for two years—or 730 days. Yesterday’s repost about Hard Rain was enough for me to achieve that personal record. I’d hoped to get 2 other posts up yesterday (maybe 3), just to make the day more of an event, but things happen (I do have 1.2 of them written, I want to note).

Sure, not every one of those days resulted in something I’m proud to have posted—once it became a goal and not something I stumbled into, I’d stress about getting something up and would have to settle for a repost of something just to qualify. But I did work on something every day, whether I got it in decent shape to post or not. I’m enjoying the discipline

I haven’t decided if I’m going to try for three straight years (1,095 days) or if I’ll let myself have a day or two off. For now, I’m just going to enjoy the accomplishment. We’ll see what happens next.

PUB DAY REPOST: Hard Rain by Samantha Jayne Allen: The Rookie PI Might Be in Over Her Head

Hard RainHard Rain

by Samantha Jayne Allen

DETAILS:
Series: Annie McIntyre Mysteries, Volume 2
Publisher: Minotaur Books
Publication Date: April 18, 2023
Format: eARC
Length: 352
Read Date: April 4-7, 2023

What’s Hard Rain About?

It’s been six months since Annie McIntyre solved a murder and began training as a Private Investigator under her grandfather and his partner, Mary-Pat. It doesn’t seem like Annie’s really sure of her current path, but at least it’s a path—hopefully out of Garnett at some point.

A High School classmate—not really a friend, but more than an acquaintance—approaches her with a job. Mary-Pat tells her she’s ready to take the lead on their next case, and is about ready to apply for her license. So, she’s primed and ready—at least she thinks so.

A couple of weeks previously a flash flood had wreaked havoc on the town and the cost in property damage and lives is high. Bethany, however, was saved through the actions of someone that she fears is a victim. But his body was never found. She wants Annie to find either the body or, preferably, the man so she can thank him properly. Not expecting the latter, and equipped with only a vague description, Annie takes the job.

The police have nothing for her, and the local fire and rescue people found no sign of this man—many people think that Bethany imagined him. But Annie keeps looking—searching downstream from the area Bethany had been found in, Annie does find a body. But not of the man she’s been looking for—but a murdered woman. Now Annie has to ask, is her target a killer or a hero?

As Annie investigates, she finds herself in a new layer of crime, corruption, and danger.

The Sense of Place

When talking about the previous book, Pay Dirt Road, I had a few things to say about the city of Garnett’s depiction. I won’t repeat them here—but I really could. I don’t think it’s an issue so much with Allen’s writing, just my ideas about Texas communities. (not that I’d complain if Annie made some mention of the population size)

What I failed to appreciate—or at least write about—was Allen’s depiction of, and description of, the natural environment. Given the storms and flood surrounding this book, it’s hard not to take note of it. Allen nails this material.

I really can see the flood damage, the sky, the geography in general—Allen pairs her vivid imagery with a little bit of wry commentary (frequently, but not always) to really help the reader get a handle on the sights and sounds. I was reminded of Chandler describing L.A. This is not typically the kind of thing I spend a lot of time thinking about when reading a P.I. novel, but I really couldn’t help but do so this time—both because of the nature of Annie’s investigation and because of Allen’s skill at it. Particularly the latter.

The Portrayal of Evangelicals

So, so, so often lately—including in books I really like—evangelicals are brought in as bastions of corruption, hypocrisy, and prejudice. Especially if they happen to belong to a mega-church.

The church that Bethany is part of, that her husband and father-in-law are pastors of, that some of the flood victims belonged to, that her missing man and the murder victim may be tied to, isn’t a mega-church yet, but is well on its way to being one.

Yes, some of the members are tied to criminal activity, unethical activity, and some other hypocritical kinds of things. But by and large the members of the church are honest, faithful, and human. They’re not perfect, but they’re working at it. It’s an honest depiction, and while not necessarily flattering, it’s not vilifying, either. I appreciate that.

Learning the Ropes

I described this series as a friend recently as “a PI version of the Eve Ronin books,” and the more I think about that, the more I like it.

Yes, Goldberg and Allen have very different tones. The tenor and flavor of the books are different—each fitting their setting and authors. But at the core, you have determined young women in settings that aren’t necessarily hospitable toward them, dealing with family issues and learning the ropes of their current professions. They make mistakes that experience would provide, get correction and guidance from their mentors (and their own reactions to their errors), but have good instincts and the drive to improve.

They’re very different series and very different kinds of stories, but I like seeing Eve and Annie as different outworkings of the same idea.

So, what did I think about Hard Rain?

Last year, I said that I’d have been satisfied with Pay Dirt Road as a standalone, but that I’d be in the front of the line for a sequel. I’m glad I came back—this world and this character deserve the time a series affords (I see there’s already a third volume scheduled for next year).

I enjoyed this one more than last year’s—I don’t know that it’s that much better, but Annie being more confident (maybe only by degrees, but it’s there) and the type of story made that possible. If you haven’t read Pay Dirt Road, Hard Rain will work as a stand-alone or as an entry point to the series, but you’d be denying yourself seeing Annie’s growth.

Atmosphere, character (not just the protagonists, but all the supporting characters as well—maybe next year I’ll find/make the time to talk about Annie’s family, for example), and story—Samantha Jayne Allen delivers the goods on all fronts. I heartily recommend Hard Rain to your attention.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from St. Martin’s Publishing Group via NetGalley in exchange for this post—thanks to both for this.


4 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.

Scratching the Flint by Vern Smith: We Didn’t Start the Fire…

I’ve been working on this one for a little over two months, and I kept deleting draft after draft after draft. I’m still not wholly satisfied with this one–but it’s close enough. Also, the book was released last weekend, so this is so overdue it’s causing heartburn. TL;DR version: This is an unsettling, brutal look at law enforcement with people on both sides of the Law.


Scratching the FlintScratching the Flint

by Vern Smith

DETAILS:
Publisher: Run Amok Crime
Publication Date: April 15, 2023
Format: ARC
Length: 228 pg.
Read Date: February 7-9, 2023

What’s Scratching the Flint About?

Detectives Alex Johnson and Cecil Bolan are part of the Toronto PD’s anti-fraud division. They’re in the midst of trying to take down a vintage car theft ring. Sadly, their witnesses are being targeted by the head of this ring–they’re being mocked and murdered in a way that sends a very loud message to quiet anyone else who might be thinking of coming forward.

One of these witnesses is an old high school friend/basketball teammate of Cecil’s. He reacts badly to this, but his commanding officer and his partner are doing their best to keep him from interfering with the homicide investigations and to focus on the ring (as much as they can without interfering with homicide) or other anti-fraud work.

It’s not long before the pair are given an involuntary vacation–in lieu of a suspension–leaving Cecil with too much time on his hands and not much opportunity for Alex to keep him reined in. And that’s where things have the opportunity to go from bad to worse–to potentially much, much worse–in this noir examination of crime and policing at the turn of the century.

2001

Smith is very careful throughout the book to locate the book in 2001 and captures the feel of it so well. At least, the way I’d imagine it’d feel in that part of Canada. The use of specific games of the Toronto Blue Jays really helped ground that.

Smith has some very specific aims for that–and most of the reason I struggled with this post comes from trying to interact with those aims but I don’t think I can without spoiling a good deal of the book. So let me just say this when it comes to the chronological setting–enjoy the flashback (for those who can remember the year) and just know it’ll give you plenty to chew on as the book goes along.

The Thin Blue Line

This is hard to write about–and frequently difficult to read. Crime Fiction writers (and TV/Movie viewers) are used to cops that color outside the lines–and we frequently root for them. We’re even used to rogue cops who go to extremes to get the job done. Or bent cops who are the villains of the piece.

Striking the Flint gives us none of those–or maybe all of those. Ian Patrick’s Sam Batford series comes to mind as a comparison (although this feels less like fiction and more like thinly disguised true crime). Our protagonists are detectives who seem intent on making their cases, on making arrests. But when push comes to shove, I’m not entirely convinced it’s about enforcing the law all the time with them–it’s getting a win, coming out on top over some of them. (I’m trying to behave here when it comes to spoilers, so I have to stay vague).

Their superiors–and other police officers–are just as involved. Skirting regulations, finding dirt on people who might have legitimate complaints about police treatment, supporting clearly unethical/illegal behavior, and so on. There are outright crimes committed by these two (usually independently) that depending on the outcome and motive would be used for comic relief or in a way that would be justified in other novels. But Smith doesn’t let the reader find the humor or rationalization for them here–sometimes they get away with them because of the badge. Sometimes, they just get away with them.

One only minorly-spoilery example: neither of these detectives owns a car. Alex’s ex-wife lets him borrow hers at the beginning of the novel. But partway through it, she takes the car back–leaving them without the means to do their jobs. So, Alex “borrows” it again without her knowledge–and gets away with it through a combination of police solidarity and misogyny. A lot of times, that would be played for laughs. I can see that being funny in a Stephanie Plum-like novel. Or someone like Bosch or Rebus would do it while feeling conflicted and have to face the music about it later. I initially took it as a lighter moment before realizing that Smith isn’t in that business.

The back of the book promises that this book examines “the lowest common denominators of policing.” And it delivers on that and will make you rethink a lot of what you read and watch in the fictional realm in light of what we see on the news.

Dialogue

There is a distinctive way that these characters talk to one another–at least Alex, Cecil, and most (if not all) of the criminals. I think if I wanted to take the time, I could come up with a more definitive list of exceptions (and that might prove interesting). Perhaps it’s a time-specific Toronto-area affectation. But I don’t think so, I think it’s a Vern Smith-thing. Like every David Milch or Aaron Sorkin series shows a specific kind of speech pattern (this is far more Milch than Sorkin, it should be noted).

It was a little odd at first, but an oddness I could appreciate. Then I got used to the rhythm and enjoyed it. By the end of the book, I don’t even think I noticed it anymore, it’d just become part of the novel’s world.

I don’t think I see this kind of thing too often in fiction, but when I do, I just love it. It’s not flashy like some people are with dialogue, just distinctive.

So, what did I think about Scratching the Flint?

This was an intense read. I was wholly immersed in it and really didn’t want to come up for air.

At the same time…these are not good people, at all. I think the characters I felt the most empathy for were Cecil’s wife (who seems utterly clueless about what he gets up to) and the lieutenant of the car theft ring’s head. He doesn’t show a lot of interest in going straight, but he doesn’t want anything to do with what his boss is involved in.

Smith captured the time, captured the psychology of the characters (or at least what you think these kinds of “cops and robbers” would think like), and delivers one of the grittiest, most realistic works you’re going to run into. Canadian noir, whodathunk it?

I cannot say I enjoyed Scratching the Flint (and I wonder a little bit about anyone who does), but it’s a powerhouse of a novel that will leave you thinking. It’s been more than two months since I read it, and I’ve chewed on bits and pieces of it almost every day since.* It’s an audacious work that will stick with you and one that will make you want more.

* And not just because I was trying to figure out how to write about it.


4 1/2 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.

 

MUSIC MONDAY: Lux Æterna by Metallica

Music Monday
Music Monday’s originated at The Tattooed Book Geek‘s fantastic blog and has shown up here and there since then. I’ve resisted joining in for various and sundry reasons (primarily that I do a lot of these X days of the week memes already—some argue too many), but I couldn’t resist an excuse to use the graphic at the bottom of the post (you can blame my kids for showing me https://www.metallicalogogenerator.com/). So, yeah, I’ll join in on this occasionally.

This week, let’s start off with a song from Metallica’s new album, “Lux Æterna.”*

* If I was going to start with a Metallica track, I probably should’ve gone with “One” for the bookish tie-in, but no one wants to spend that much time on this page.

The Irresponsible Reader Metallica Logo

On the Apostolic Preaching by Irenaeus of Lyons: A Timeless Survey of Redemptive History

On the Apostolic PreachingOn the Apostolic Preaching

by Irenaeus of Lyons , John Behr (Translator)

DETAILS:
Series: Popular Patristics Series, #17
Publisher: St Vladimir's Seminary Press
Publication Date: September 01, 2003
Format: Paperback
Length: 101 pgs.
Read Date: April 2-9, 2023

What’s On the Apostolic Preaching About?

This is one of the two surviving works we have from the Second-Century theologian, Irenaeus. In this work, he simply recounts the Biblical storyline about the promised and coming and then Incarnate Messiah, His Earthly ministry, death, resurrection, and the spread of the Gospel.

I’m really not sure what else to say—he basically summarizes the Scriptures with a focus on Jesus.

Readability

I said essentially the same thing with the last book in this series that I blogged about, but I think it bears repeating.

For just about every reader (at least we non-scholars) the idea of reading Patristics is fairly daunting—even if you’ve done it before and emerged relatively unscathed (and maybe even learned something or enjoyed it). And it probably shouldn’t be that daunting on the whole (am more than sure that there are plenty of examples of intimidating texts).

There’s a reason that this work has endured through the centuries—it’s not just for its historical significance (although I’m sure that’s a lot of it), but this is something that has benefitted believers through the years from all levels of education and experience. There’s no one who can’t read and learn from this.

So, what did I think about On the Apostolic Preaching?

I started off a little annoyed by one of the introductory essays that stated that the first reading

will probably result in surprise and perhaps disappointment. Irenaeus does not present Christianity, in the way we have come to think of it, as a system of theological beliefs. Moreover, very little place is given to the ecclesiastical or sacramental dimensions of Christianity, nor does he describe the mystical life of prayer.

One, I didn’t know what to expect from this—I really only knew “Irenaeus” and “Popular Patristics” when I bought and then opened the book. Secondly, when I discovered what it was, I wasn’t disappointed. This is exactly what I want to see out of a 2nd Century writer—because it’s the kind of thing I appreciate in a 21st Century Writer. It’s reassuring to see that the central idea of what Apostolic Preaching ought to be is pretty much the same for both eras—yeah, some of what Irenaeus wrote could use some fine-tuning (and he’d likely say the same of what shows up in one of the Essential Studies in Biblical Theology volumes I’ve discussed). But their modus operandi are so similar, that it’s clear that they’re walking in the same direction.

I found this to be a quick, approachable read—as relatable today as it had to have been centuries ago (although I guess it’d be safe to say that many of his readers might not be ready to hear what he said in the same way I was). I was very encouraged by this and wish I’d read it years ago so I could be on my fifth or sixth reading now.

Highly recommended.


5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, the opinions expressed are my own.

Saturday Miscellany—4/15/23

I didn’t set out to share a bunch of recommendation lists this week, but, it ended up that way (and I axed a couple before publishing). Actually, I’m a little surprised to see that I have much to share. I spent most of my blog-hopping/social media/reading time this week doing things with people—a strange occurrence for this introverted homebody (all pleasant, don’t get me wrong–just strange).

Odds ‘n ends about books and reading that caught my eye this week. You’ve probably seen some/most/all of them, but just in case:
bullet Bristol library exhibition of forgotten items left in books—I always enjoy these stories about odd things found in library books. (also, wow, is the BBC more comfortable with silence than US news. There’s no way that a US newscast wouldn’t impose a voiceover on those shots).
bullet How Bookshop.org Survives—and Thrives—in Amazon’s World—(and yes, I would’ve shared this story even if I hadn’t recently been transitioned over to Bookshop.org for my purchase links)
bullet Are these the most influential novelists of 2023?—LitHub’s Emily Temple trimmed TIME magazine’s 100 Most Influential People of 2023 down to the bookish people.
bullet Judy Blume forever: the writer who dares to tell girls the plain truth—a nice piece about her on the eve of the long-awaited adaptation of her classic novel
bullet Behind the Scenes of Barack Obama’s Reading Lists: Does the president really read all those books? The answer might surprise you.—huh. With lists like his (which are always interesting to peruse, even if they don’t move me to read anything) being so influential, it’s nice to get a behind-the-scenes glance.
bullet How Ian Fleming Wrote Casino Royale and Changed Spy Fiction Forever
bullet Don Winslow recommends 6 novels that have informed his craft
bullet The 15 Best Modern Sci-Fi Authors Who Are Writing Today
bullet What Characters Peat Likes
bullet ARC Book Review Etiquette
bullet Discussion: Star ratings need not be part of reviews
bullet Revisiting my old blog posts—I don’t know that I’d have the guts to do this
bullet Not So Gentle Giants: A Ramble on Big Men in early Epic Fantasy—a fun little ramble
bullet Real Funny Books – Random Titles—some people would move on and try to forget these titles. Other people make lists with them.

This Week’s New Releases that I’m Excited About and/or You’ll Probably See Here Soon:
bullet Blood Runs Cold by Neil Lancaster—The newest DS Max Craigie promises to be disturbing as it focuses on human trafficking victims being re-abducted. It took me months to get to the last Max Craigie–I’m hoping my priorities are in better shape now.

Lastly, I’d like to say hi and extend a warm welcome to Damien de Soto, who followed the blog this week. I hope you enjoy the content and keep coming back.
Honestly every book is a self-help book if you love to read

The Friday 56 for 4/13/23: Ozark Dogs by Eli Cranor

The Friday 56This is a weekly bloghop hosted by Freda’s Voice.

RULES:
The Friday 56 Grab a book, any book.
The Friday 56 Turn to Page 56 or 56% on your ereader. If you have to improvise, that is okay.
The Friday 56 Find a snippet, short and sweet.
The Friday 56 Post it.

from Page 56 (and 57) of:
Ozark Dogs

Ozark Dogs by Eli Cranor

Evail loved his big brother, a bond that went even deeper than blood. In a way, Rudnick was the start of everything all those nights in the field, the kits’ calls playing out scared and lonely. It was just like the hunting. Rudnick had simply asked if Evail would do it, and then he did. Again and again. For a while, the brothers went hunting almost every night. It was the summer before Rudnick’s senior year in high school. Evail on the cusp of sixteen.

And then Rudnick was gone, Evail went to prison, and everything changed. The darkness shifted and the calls howled from the inside out. When Evail returned, he took to the field alone, no longer using the recordings, opting instead for the darkness, working along the tree lines and stalking his prey. He wore the hides of the creatures he’d taken. A mass of fur and bone death-still in the shadows, Evail crouching, waiting, the gun barrel blue in the night. Coyotes were loyal and thick as thieves. When one went down, the others came running. It wasn’t until there was a pile of blood-warm bodies that the big boy would finally come sauntering up from the shadows. The alpha. Rudnick had always been the alpha. He wasn’t anything anymore.

The Quarter Year Crisis Book Tag

The Quarter Year Crisis Book Tag
I’ve seen this on a couple of blogs like Dini Panda Reads and Biblio Nerd Reflections, and it seemed pretty fun. Also, I hadn’t done a tag in ages, and wanted to. It was created by @Roisin’s Reading.

How many books have you read so far?

81 titles on 4/8 (the day I’m composing this), which is where I was on 4/8 of last year (although this year’s number includes more picture books, so I’m behind the pace). That’s not bad at all.

Have you already found a book you think might be a 2023 favourite[sic]? If not, what was your favourite book you read that wasn’t quite five stars?

FearlessBlank SpaceHow to Examine a Wolverine

Fearless by M.W. Craven and Vera Wong’s Unsolicited Advice for Murderers by Jesse Q. Sutanto are destined to end up in my Top 10 of the year, possibly Top 3.

Any 1-star books / least favourite book of the year?

Triptych

The audiobook for Triptych by Karin Slaughter is the only book that comes to mind here. It’s not a 1-Star, and is too well put together for that. But it qualifies as least favorite.

Most read genre so far?

Hold on to your hats here..you’re going to be surprised…it’s Mystery/Crime/Thriller. I’ll give you a moment to gasp while you look at the pie chart.

1 Quarter Genre Chart

A book that surprised you?

That’s a good question. I guess

Magpie Murders

Magpie Murders maybe? I’d heard only good things, so I expected it to be good–just didn’t expect it to be that good. Vera Wong’s Unsolicited Advice for Murderers might also qualify that way.

Triptych also qualifies because I’m suprised that that book could lead to a 11-book long series and a TV show.

A book that’s come out in 2023 already that you want to read but haven’t yet?

Ozark Dogs by Eli Cranor is the one that jumps to mind, but by the time this posts, I should have at leasted started it. I think I’m doing pretty good at keeping up with the new releases I’m into this year…we’ll talk about the side-effects of that below.

A few others that qualify:

Know Thy EnemyBlank SpaceBut Have You Read the Book?

Lie to HerBlank SpaceEverybody Knows

bullet Know Thy Enemy by Jeffery H. Haskell
bullet But Have You Read the Book?: 52 Literary Gems That Inspired Our Favorite Films by Kristen Lopez
bullet Lie to Her by Melinda Leigh (my library hold just became available, so this will be taken care of soon-ish)
bullet Everybody Knows by Jordan Harper

One goal you made that you’re succeeding at

Keeping up with New Releases? But that’s not an “official” goal. I guess it would be The 2023 Booktempter’s TBR reduction challenge and reading stuff for my Grandpappy’s Corner series.

One goal you made that you need to focus on

Every other one. I really want to focus on reading the books I’ve bought (mostly) and/or planned to buy (a few) for the Literary Locals series. These look great and I need to stop distracting myself to read and blog about these. New releases and author submissions keep distracting me and getting my off-target. I need to rein myself in.

New to you Bloggers/Booktubers/ Bookstagrammers/Booktokers for 2023 you recommend?

I’m not sure if these were new-to-me in 2023, but they’re pretty recently new-to-me (or blogs I’ve read before, but I’ve gotten more consistent about checking):
bullet Biblio Nerd Reflections
bullet Gina Rae Mitchell
bullet Mike Finn’s Fiction
bullet reader@work
bullet Read with Me
bullet Stephen Writes

A Few Quick Questions with…Harry L-B

I talked about Harry L-B’s debut novel, Billy in Space, earlylier today, and am now very pleased to bring you this Q&A with the author!


Let’s start off by introducing yourself to the readers—talk about your background, path to publication, etc.
My background is in theater. Outside of my day job, I’ve spent the last ten years writing and performing on stage in small venues around Milwaukee. Before Billy in Space I hadn’t actually thought about writing a novel. Writing plays or sketches always felt easier, because they didn’t necessarily have to be that long, and the actors do half the work for you. Billy in Space was my first attempt at a novel during a NaNoWriMo, and I loved the world and story I created so much that I decided to try publishing it.

Before I dive into Billy in Space questions, do you want to plug your webseries? Where’d this project come from?
I would be happy to plug Space Station-19. SS-19 was a project born out of the pandemic. My partner and I were both stuck at home, feeling isolated and bored like everyone else. With all that time on my hands, I decided to turn those feelings into a funny cartoon about a couple of blue collar workers on the edge of space. I wanted to make something that I could produce on a regular schedule, so each episode was only about a minute long and reused the same set and props as much as it could. Right now the show is on an indefinite hiatus while I tie up some other projects, but I’m proud of the 80-ish episodes we have so far, and have plans for future installments down the road. If your readers are interested in a bite-sized mashup of early RedvsBlue and Futurama, they should check it out.

All authors have more ideas running around in their head than they can possibly develop—what was it about this idea that made you commit to writing it? Was this something that was originally intended for Space Station-19, but ended up needing to be told somewhere else? Or did you set out to do something in a new medium?
The idea for Billy in Space actually started out as a video game. It was originally a sort of 2D riff on Dead Space, but as more ideas about the world and story popped up, the more I wasn’t sure I could pull it off as a video game. As to how it relates to Space Station-19, Billy in Space was actually done way before SS-19. It was just my first novel, so taking it from first draft to something I’m comfortable with people reading took a very long time.

I like to find someone other than the protagonist to focus on in my Q&As, and I have to ask about Boris here. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong, but I think he’ll be overlooked by most readers, who’ll fixate on Billy, Andy, Alice, and Janet. Do you actually know his backstory, or is it something you just kept inventing layers for when the opportunity arose? Have you thought about using him as a protagonist for something—or do you think he’s most effective (and funny) as a secondary character?
Boris is one of those characters that started out more as a device than a person, and slowly took shape as he had more interactions with the other characters. Some of my favorite characters in other media are the ones that the audience never really gets to know outside of the weird one-liners that paint a progressively weirder and weirder picture of their life outside the story. Because of that I don’t know that Boris can ever be a viewpoint character, since the comedy comes from that mystery, but that doesn’t mean he can’t grow and change. He could certainly be more of a focus, or even a protagonist if he shows up in later stories, we just probably won’t see the world through his eyes.

How do you approach humor in your stories? Do you work to maintain a balance between it and the action/tension? Does it come naturally? Do you have to come back on a later draft and insert or delete jokes to get it right?
I think every story should be at least ten percent comedy. Humans are naturally funny, oftentimes in reaction to difficult or even terrifying scenarios. Leaning into those natural human reactions, and heightening the stakes and absurdity of what those humans are reacting to is how you get to comedy. Or you can string some funny words together. That always makes me giggle.

It’s pretty clear that you’re into Science Fiction and humor—are there other genres you want to try in the future? Do you spend much time reading/watching other genres, or is SF primarily your thing?
If I had a favorite thing to write it would certainly be scifi-comedy, especially when it leans at least a little into space-horror. That being said, I do have another very early draft of a novel which is a riff on old adventure paperbacks, and I have had an idea for a more traditional fantasy novel that I’d like to get to one day. As for what I read, I am a sucker for most things with spaceships, but I also enjoy reading horror and fantasy. Bonus points for anything that also gets me to laugh.

Let’s play “Online Bookstore Algorithm” (a game I made up for these Q&As). What are 3-5 books whose readers may like Billy in Space?
Billy in Space shares a genre with Will Save the Galaxy for Food, so if you enjoy Yahtzee Croshaw’s work, I bet you’d like it. I’d also compare it to Meddling Kids, for its mix of horror and humor. On the strictly scifi-horror side of things, if you liked the novels Dead Silence, The Luminous Dead, or any of the recent Alien novels I bet you’d enjoy it.

What’s next for Harry L-B, author? More novels, or are you thinking of trying a different medium next time?
I would like to get some more novels out there, specifically some that build on Billy in Space`, but up next might be a few video games. I was just at the Midwest Gaming Classic telling people about my first game, I Wouldn’t, a short, silly-horror escape room type game. After that, my next project will probably be a game that shares a world with Billy in Space and Space Station-19. I’ve started working on it, but it’s in its very early stages at this point, so nothing specific to say right now. If you’re at all curious, be sure to follow me on youtube (HarryLBonYoutube), as you’ll hear more about any of my upcoming projects there first.

Thanks for your time—and thanks for introducing me to Billy, Boris, and the rest. I had a great time hanging out with them.


Page 191 of 630

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén