Tag: 3 1/2 Stars Page 14 of 41

The Bounty by Janet Evanovich with Steve Hamilton: Fox and O’Hare are on the Hunt for Nazi Gold

The Bounty

The Bounty

by Janet Evanovich with Steve Hamilton
Fox and O’Hare, #7

Hardcover, 305 pg.
Atria Books, 2021

Read: May 26-28, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

“Yeah, it’s a pickle, all right,” Jake said. “We used to call missions like this one-percenters.”

“Meaning one percent chance of success?” Quentin asked. “I’ve been on a few of those myself.”

Jake smiled. “I’m not being trying to be pessimistic. As a matter of fact, one-percenters are usually the most fun. There’s no pressure when you’re trying to do the impossible.”

What’s The Bounty About?

The day has gotten away from me, so I’m not going to come up with my own synopsis for this one, but I’ll borrow the description from Evanovich’s site so I can get a little shut-eye:

Straight as an arrow special agent Kate O’Hare and international con man Nick Fox have brought down some of the biggest criminals out there. But now they face their most dangerous foe yet—a vast, shadowy international organization known only as the Brotherhood.
Directly descended from the Vatican Bank priests who served Hitler during World War II, the Brotherhood is on a frantic search for a lost train loaded with $30 billion in Nazi gold, untouched for over seventy-five years somewhere in the mountains of Eastern Europe.
Kate and Nick know that there is only one man who can find the fortune and bring down the Brotherhood—the same man who taught Nick everything he knows—his father, Quentin. As the stakes get higher, they must also rely on Kate’s own father, Jake, who shares his daughter’s grit and stubbornness. Too bad they can never agree on anything.
From a remote monastery in the Swiss Alps to the lawless desert of the Western Sahara, Kate, Nick, and the two men who made them who they are today must crisscross the world in a desperate scramble to stop their deadliest foe in the biggest adventure of their lives.

The State of the Series

Books 1-5 (co-written by Lee Goldberg) were comedic heist/con adventures, with a goofy (slightly over-the-top) supporting cast—that were just so fun to read. The sixth book (co-written by Peter Evanovich) tried to match that and just failed.

Now, Steve Hamilton has stepped into the co-writer spot and the series has shifted a bit. The Bounty is more of a straightforward thriller—sure, it’s lighter than most thrillers, but it’s not a comedy. Almost all of the supporting cast is absent, we only get Kate’s father, Jake (frequently the best part of the early books) with Nick’s father, Quentin, being introduced. Quentin isn’t goofy at all, he’s not over-the-top, but he’s a fun character. Nick’s sleight-of-hand antics and thievery are on display—but we don’t get any hint of a con job. I missed that.

I don’t know if Book 8 will get back to the early roots (my preference) or if it’ll keep going in this path. But at the very least, I can look forward to the next book again, something I feared wouldn’t happen again.

There’s a parallel to this and my mini-rant about the cover designs from a couple of weeks ago. Which you might want to give a read if you didn’t see that.

So, what did I think about The Bounty?

This was a make-or-break entry in the series for me, if I didn’t enjoy this one, I was going to walk away from these. But Evanovich and Hamilton have reassured me. This is just so much better than the disaster that was The Big Kahuna that I’m willing to embrace (at least temporarily) this new style. I hope it continues.

If you like light thrillers with a semi-Indiana Jones feel, with a dash of flirtation between the leads thrown in, you should give this a try. The first five books in the series are better, but this is a good entry point.


3.5 Stars
2021 Library Love Challenge

99 Poems to Cure Whatever’s Wrong with You or Create The Problems You Need by Sam Pink: The Cartoon Continues

99 Poems to Cure Whatever's Wrong with You or Create The Problems You Need

99 Poems to Cure
Whatever’s Wrong with You
or Create The Problems
You Need

by Sam Pink

Paperback, 103 pg.
CLASH Books, 2019

Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!


A little housekeeping to start: That title is just too long to keep using, you know? I thought about using 99PtCWWwYoCTPYN, but that’s almost as bad—actually, it’s probably worse aesthetically speaking. So, I’m going to go with 99 Poems.

Why Did I Want to Read 99 Poems…?

I’ve mentioned around here before that I’m not much of a poetry reader. In fact, I think I’ve only posted about one other poetry collection. I think this the fourth poetry collection I’ve read since I graduated from college in the mid-90s.

So what possessed me to pick this up? Well, despite what it may look like around here (and certainly how it feels sometimes), I do want to keep trying new/less familiar things. What got this to my attention was that someone on my Twitter feed posted a picture of one of the poems from this book a couple of months ago—I believe it was “The Woodchuck”—it made me smile, and it seemed like a good idea to try some more.

Which is how I got here. Trying to figure out how to talk about poems.

Comic Poems

Like the poem that got my attention, many of these poems fall under the heading of “comic.” They all won’t make you laugh—but you’ll probably grin a bit. The construction is similar to a joke, but I think it’s a disservice, even for the comic poems to treat them as simply that.

The Non-Comic Poems

Then there are the poems on the other end of the spectrum, moving, poignant—even uplifting.

I think most readers will find themselves in some/many of these. Which is both comforting and unnerving.

Approachable

None of these are difficult to read (some may be challenging to chew on)—a few are two or three lines, a few are about 2 pages long. Most are 6-ish lines long.

Really, I’ve read tweets that contain as many characters as some of these poems. I guess I’m saying, there’s no reason for non-poetry readers like me to feel intimidated by these.

Samples

I’m no photographer, but typing out these poems to give you a taste seems strange, they should look the way they were printed. Here’s a couple of the poems that stayed with me.
Masters
It's Always Both

So, what did I think about 99 Poems…?

How do you not like something with that title? That’s practically an instant 3-Stars right there.

But more than that, I liked this collection. Reading a couple of these is a good break from everything else going on in the world around you. A simple way to look at things in a different way. I’m likely to keep an eye out for more by Pink, and I think you should, too.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

The Christian’s True Identity by Jonathan Landry Cruse: An Introduction to the Glory that is Being “In Him”

The Christian’s True Identity

The Christian’s True Identity:
What It Means to
Be in Christ

by Jonathan Landry Cruse

Kindle Edition, 144 pg.
Reformation Heritage, 2019

Read: March 21, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

Many of us are raised believing that Jesus is simply the way to salvation. But no—He is salvation. He is the way, but He is also the life! He is both the giver and the gift. He is not a means to an end; He is the end. We are not to come to Christ looking for Him to give us something (like salvation, sanctification, a better life—or at least a better car), but instead we are to come to Christ looking for Him.

What’s The Christian’s True Identity About?

I’ve spent too much time trying to be clever or profound with this, it’s a short book, I can be brief here. The book’s point is pretty simple—despite all the noise and hubbub today about finding ourselves, choosing/shaping our identity. For the Christian, our identity comes from being rooted in Christ.

One of the—possibly the—greatest truths recovered by the Reformation was that union with Christ is at the core of all the blessings, all the amazing things that are true of the Christian, the Christian Life, and the Life of the World to Come. It’s all rooted and grounded in Him.

John calls it “abiding in” Christ. Paul repeatedly describes our blessings “in Him.” Cruse looks at ten passages from Paul’s epistles where he uses the phrase “in Him,” reviewing the passage, explaining how the passage reflects and teaches this truth about Christian identity, and applying it to the reader.

So, what did I think about The Christian’s True Identity?

Throughout this book we have considered how an identity in Christ far excels any identity the world might offer us. When we are in Christ we are chosen, forgiven, accepted as righteous, adopted into God’s family, placed in community, made new, and kept perfectly secure come what may. Our blessings in Jesus Christ are so expansive that it can truly be said that our union began in eternity with election and will forever continue in eternity with glorification.

That’s pretty much what’s covered in the book—done effectively, warmly, and clearly. Cruse has an easy-to-read, engaging style—he’ll draw you in and make you want to learn more. He skillfully uses writers from throughout Church History, contemporary scholarship, and current cultural examples to help bring these truths to life.

I think it could be deeper, I think it could be more detailed. But that’s not what the book aimed for—it’s an introduction or a refresher, that’s all. It’s supposed to drive the reader to further study, further reading. It accomplishes that goal while pointing to glorious, foundational truths. I commend it to you for that.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

R. C. Sproul: A Life by Stephen J. Nichols: The Life and Work of Robert Charles Sproul

R. C. Sproul A Life

R. C. Sproul: A Life

by Stephen J. Nichols

Hardcover, 306 pg.
Crossway, 2021

Read: May 2-16, 2021

Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

Why Did I Pick Up R. C. Sproul: A Life?

If you were to go into any (confessional) Presbyterian or Reformed church in the U. S., you would have a very difficult time finding anyone there who hasn’t read a book or watched/heard a lecture by R. C. Sproul, usually several of either/each. The Holiness of God and Chosen by God were monumental in my life—and so many of his other works were huge, too. I saw him live twice, and couldn’t tell you how many videos and audio tapes/mp3s I learned from.

Basically, this guy was as close to a contemporary giant as we’ve had (whether having a giant in the church is a good or bad thing is a different discussion), so of course, I had to jump at a chance to learn more about him.

What’s R. C. Sproul: A Life About?

It’s all there in the title, really. This is a look at the life of Robert Charles Sproul, author/teacher/minister. Nichols covers it all—from his childhood to university days (and conversion), his post-graduate education, and early work. Then he moves into the founding of the Ligonier Study Center and how that led to Sproul’s books, radio show, and the rest of his work, culminating in the planting of Saint Andrews Chapel and the founding Reformation Bible College. The history of Ligonier Ministries in its various stages of development is also traced throughout. The last chapter serves as an extended eulogy for Sproul, recapping the major points of his life’s work and glancing at his legacy.

In many ways this serves as an intellectual biography and Nicholls will examine the background, main points, and impact of some of Sproul’s major projects and works in addition to the account of his life and work. These portions of the book are the highlights for me—serving both as a reminder of things I’d forgotten and a handy summary of Sproul’s major contributions.

Some Complaints

Nichols’ use of R. C. throughout, rather than Sproul, rubbed me the wrong way. I realize full well that the two had been friends for years, but I guess I expect a bit more formality from a biography.

It’s his friendship that colors this work, I think. There’s no critical eye on anything—personal choices, ecclesiastical acts, writing, public teaching, alliances with people in and out of the church—Nichols covers it all as if everything was inarguably positive and well done. While I’m sure Nichols would affirm that Sproul was fallible and capable of error, there’s no evidence of that in the book.

The discussion of Sproul’s thoughts on apologetics irked me. It’s stated that Sproul went to seminary a convinced presuppositionalist, and then Dr. Gerstner showed him the error of his ways on that issue, as well as Reformed Theology. So that his later critiques of Van Tillian apologetics come from the pen of someone who knows “both” sides and has seen the error of his ways. Well, if he didn’t become Reformed until after he shed his presuppositionalism, he wasn’t Van Tillian. Van Tillian presuppositionalism is rooted and grounded in Reformed (“Calvinistic”) theology, so Sproul was never in that camp. And frankly, I’ve listened to and read Sproul talking about Presuppositionalism, and as brilliant as he was, I just don’t think he ever really understood it. Is it that important? Not really—it just irked me, especially the way that Nichols used Sproul’s apologetic methodology in the book.

So, what did I think about R. C. Sproul: A Life?

Ultimately, this is more of an extended tribute than a biography. Nichols is no Iain H. Murray. And when I was about halfway through this book, I realized that’s what I wanted—a book roughly equivalent to Murray’s The Life of Martyn Lloyd-Jones (although I’d have been satisfied with something closer to his work on Edwards). But there’s no way anyone could have something of that scale ready less than four years after Sproul’s death, so that’s unrealistic. But I’m not going to be satisfied until we get that.

Nevertheless, I do recommend this book—it’s a good look at the man, his life, and his work. It helps understand where he came from, what led to various books and themes in his work. I do think I know Sproul better after this and that’s a good thing.

Also, if anyone deserves a 300-page tribute, it’s R. C. Sproul.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

A Wanted Man by Rob Parker: Meet Ben Bracken

A Wanted Man

A Wanted Man

by Rob Parker
Series: Ben Braken, #1

Kindle Edition, 206 pg.
Lume Books, 2017

Read: May 6-8, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

Jack’s father goes missing but turns up dead in a warehouse at Manchester Airport. Shot. Who has access to firearms here in the UK? Farmers, the police, and organised crime. I can’t picture an angry pig farmer losing his shit and heading to Manchester Airport to clip someone. Nor can I especially imagine a police officer doing the same thing, although stranger things have happened. And that leaves the last one. Organised crime.

What’s A Wanted Man About?

Ben Bracken was sent to prison not that long ago, but just walked out a free man—although he wasn’t actually released (nor was he scheduled to be). He has some “insurance” to keep him from having to go back and had a little cash set aside for when he was out of prison.

His plan is to get his cash, secure his insurance policy and head off to London to get revenge on the man who got him sent to prison. But before he can do that, his friend Jack has a problem. Jack’s father was just murdered and he doesn’t see the police—or his father’s criminal associates—doing that much to find the killer. Would Ben help? Sure—especially because Jack’s also in danger as long as the killer is out there.

Before Ben can enjoy his first beer in years, he’s set on a path that will lead him to going up against two crime syndicates, and decades of history, just to get Jack both the answers and safety he needs.

A Little About Ben

But… I feel a nagging. That familiar tug of duty. I carry it everywhere with me even now, bound by it, cajoled by my gratitude to Jack…

My problem is compounded by my brittle, unique moral compass. My idea of good and bad is very black and white, with great streaks of grey smeared straight across the borders between the two– the zone in which I have been known to take matters into my own hands. Those grey areas demand I owe Jack some assistance, even if it is outside of my self-imposed remit.

Ben Bracken is yet another soldier who’s having a hard time adjusting to society after years of active duty (see also Jack Reacher, Peter Ash, John Rambo, and a couple of other characters whose names slipped my mind as I got to this point), but his sense of duty kept him trying to do good. His early attempts were less than successful, landing him in prison. Now that he’s released, he’s going to resume his quest (you can practically see him sporting Joe Pike’s tattoos—as well as living them out). Sure, he had another initial target in mind, but Jack’s situation fit his mission, so he’s able to delay his own plan and help Jack out.

But basically, you get the idea that he’s going to be another of the modern wandering samurai hero—like Reacher and Ash—just with a different kind of baggage. Namely, being an escaped prisoner in a country where the kind of weapons Reacher and Ash seem to have a steady supply of aren’t that readily available. It’s a fresh version of that character type, and I’m more than interested.

There’s more than just his criminal past to separate him from the typical wandering warrior. He’s not a technophobe, actually, he’s fairly capable when it comes to the basics of technology (once someone explains what Siri is and how to use it), but he’s not a whiz. He has a sense of humor, but he’s not cracking jokes all the time—and to say that he has issues with women is understating it, but he’ll likely move on from those.

I was pretty much sold on Ben early on, and was invested in the story—but at one point, we get this line:

I whistle a little (surprised to find my ‘go to’ whistling tune is Somewhere Over The Rainbow), and drop my pocket change noisily onto the dresser.

and I knew I liked Ben, and was probably going to be buying a few more books.

Parker’s Writing

The actual writing involved in a book is something I always think about, always take into consideration when rating a book—but it’s the thing I have the hardest part discussing. Something about Parker’s work here made me want to try it.

There’s a lot of this book that comes across as a pretty standard indie thriller. That’s not a judgment, it’s just a description. In many indie thrillers, there are repeated sections that make me wince (including novels that I like). A Wanted Man has none of those—quite the opposite, he has several sections that are just wonderful.

He can sum up a character in a few words—

The curious obsessive-compulsive aspect of this guy, which, twinned with the seemingly bottomless battery of his energy, gives his personality an almost pathological slant.

His precise, measured way of speaking seems pulled from the pages of a book, exactly how you’d picture someone of his generation learning a foreign language.

I had a few more examples in my notes, but this post is getting too long.

His ability to capture a scene or a room is even better:

I leave the motorway networks as the daylight fades and trundle through the bleak stone township of Glossop, as wild hills begin to sprout out either side of the settlement. I know where I am going, and follow the ‘V’ in the horizon where two hills meet and a road carves through: Snake Pass. Suddenly, the buildings and pavements disappear, and I’m out in the open, rolling through a picture-book patchwork of varying landscapes: undulating rugged grasslands, steep canyon drop-offs, vast forests of tall firs, and a softly lapping reservoir. You could be lost out here, but still feel in touch with the gods. It’s Lord of the Rings country, Tolkien’s inspiration. It’s Britain at its most beautiful, most powerful, most respectful.

Ben and Jack visit a floating restaurant and I could almost think I’d been there.

Sure, some of his descriptions are a bit much—I didn’t need that much detail about one man’s behavior at a urinal. No one does. But thankfully, those are few and far between (but, sure, I have a crystal clear vision of what happened there).

One more example of how good Parker can be, and then I’ll move on. At one point, Bracken visits the house he grew up in. I read the two paragraphs as he left a few times, they were just that good (and hopefully out of context you can tell that)

I walk down the path to the scuffed, mucky pavement. The gum on the concrete beneath my shoes, some of it is undoubtedly mine. My DNA lies at my feet, inseparable from my town, my past. That DNA is now the only evidence I was ever here. Thirty years of love, life, family– all reduced to a dirty bit of gum on an old pavement.

This will steel me. Toughen me. It has to. Because this would, could, should break a lesser man.

So, What Did I Think About A Wanted Man?

There’s a very “pilot episode” feel to this one—the focus is on introducing Ben Bracken, his world, his situation, and his mission. The actual story seems of secondary importance. Maybe I’m being too harsh—I likely am, but that was the impression I got.

The Epilogue shows that this isn’t just going to be a series about Ben’s quest for vengeance—there’s something else going on. Now Ben just out to get revenge on the man who sent him to prison would probably be worth sticking around to watch. But Ben doing that and the stuff from the Epilogue? Now, that’s a winning combination.

Do I recommend this? Absolutely. A great character, a compelling direction for the series, and some strong writing make up for a story that seems pretty boilerplate (but a good boilerplate, don’t get me wrong). I’m coming back for more soon, and can see these books becoming a favorite.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Surviving Religion 101 by Michael J. Kruger: Letters to a Christian College Sudent

Surviving Religion 101

Surviving Religion 101: Letters to a Christian Student on Keeping the Faith in College

by Michael J. Kruger

Paperback, 241 pg.
Crossway, 2021

Read: April 18-25, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

What’s Surviving Religion 101 About?

The book is structured as sixteen letters to Kruger’s daughter, a college freshman at UNC (his own alma mater). Kruger remembers the challenges he had to deal with at the school in terms of faith and knows that things haven’t gotten easier for college students in the years since then.

These letters are written as encouragements for her regarding some specific challenges he expects that she will have to deal with because of things professors or peers will say—directly or indirectly—that will challenge her thinking and faith. As well as he may have tried to prepare her before she left for college, it’s different when it’s no longer a matter of preparation, but of daily experience.

Kruger’s aim is to help Emma—and other readers—know that there are intellectually satisfying defenses to the challenges thrown her way. Believing isn’t about shutting down the mind to thinking, rather, it’s about loving God with our mind.

…I am not under the impression that merely reading this book will answer every possible question a college student may have. Nor do I think any single book (or even many books) could prepare students to go toe-to-toe with their college professor. No, the intent here is much more modest. Like any complex task, eventually, you have to take the first step, even if it’s a little one. This volume is designed to be that first step, an initial orientation for Christian students about the challenges they face and (hopefully) a reason for them to be confident that there are answers to their questions, even if they don’t yet have them.

Or as the title suggests, this book is about surviving—with faith intact—one’s university experience. Now, that may seem like a strange goal, perhaps one that is far too modest. Don’t we, as Christians, want to do more than survive? Don’t we want to make an impact and change the world while in college? Sure, but that’s not where one starts. Instead, you start by not stopping. By not giving up. By surviving. You can’t “change the world” for Christ if you no longer believe in Christ or walk with Christ.

He deals with things like belief in miracles (in particular, the Resurrection), the so-called problem of evil, the exclusivity of Christianity, Christian sexual ethics, pitting science versus religion, the reliability of the New Testament (in light of Bart Ehrman’s position at UNC, this is of particular importance). Kruger sets out to show that yes, Christians have been answering these/similar challenges for centuries, these are not things that need to shipwreck a believer’s faith but can be faced head-on.

Highlights and Concerns

I thought every chapter in the book was solid and helpful—there’s not a disappointing one in the bunch. Kruger is good to show both the thinking behind the challenge to the faith represented by the various topics and the answers (or at least the beginning or answers) needed to push back. But he shows why the challenge is important, why it matters what the Christian response is (first to the believer dealing with the objection/challenge, and then to the one outside the faith), and offers encouragement to persevere in light of the issue.

I did think that Kruger perhaps focused too much on the reliability of the Scriptures and similar topics—given that three chapters when everything else gets one. Still, given Kruger’s specialty in textual and canon studies, it makes sense—particularly when you add in the importance of the topic, and the lack of exposure most Christians (of all ages) have to these ideas.

At the end of the day, however, for this reader, it all comes down to the Postscript, “What Do I Do If It Feels Like Christianity Just Isn’t Working for Me?” Setting aside the focus on the mind, he turns to the affections, concentrating on the affections the believer has for the person of Christ first and foremost, with the details of all the other issues covered in the book before this point (and more) coming in second.

Here is where many believers miss the point of the Christian life. Some are part of the church because they are excited about being involved in a “good cause” or because they love helping people or because they resonate with the idea of Christianity. But in the end, that’s not the heart of the faith. We are not Christians so that we can be part of a cause; we are Christians so that we can know a person: Jesus Christ. Don’t forget, he’s a real person, not just a concept And it is only our affection, our love, our adoration for him as a person that will keep us faithful to the end. If we are concerned only about a cause, that will fade as soon as difficulty and suffering come. Causes come and go. Jesus is forever.

So, what did I think about Surviving Religion 101?

When I left high school for college in the last century, I remember getting a couple of books along these lines and saw them all the time, too. How to secure your child’s faith during college, how to help them avoid the moral failings the surround them, etc. Memorize these facts (in a very Josh McDowell-esque fashion), stay away from booze and sex, and you might end up ushering in a revival at your college. Kruger’s approach is more of a, “it’s okay, let’s talk and help you deal with these.” Not to emerge victorious, but to emerge intact and ready to try again the next day.

There’s no fear in these pages, instead, there’s a quiet confidence, a trusting in the acre of the Father—encouragement to keep on keeping on and a reminder that the Son has redeemed his people, and they should live with humble boldness ready for with answer for the hope that liest within.

I recommend this book, and encourage readers of the right age (or beyond) give this a shot.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

PUB DAY REPOST: Robert B. Parker’s Payback by Mike Lupica: Sunny Does Some Dangerous Favors for Some Dear Friends

Payback

Robert P. Parker’s Payback

by Mike Lupica
Series: Sunny Randall, #9

eARC, 352 pg.
G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 2021

Read: April 14-15, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

What’s Payback About?

Sunny’s closest friend, Spike, has got himself in trouble—he needed some financial assistance to keep the doors of his restaurant open (like just about every restaurant in 2020) and let a long-time customer and friend, a hedge fund manager, loan him the money. But when Spike tried to pay off the loan, he learned the hard way that Alex Drysdale wasn’t so much a friend as he was an opportunistic toad, and thanks to clever work on the contract, Spike had defaulted on the loan almost immediately.

Spike has already let his fists do the talking (and broken Drysdale’s nose), but oddly enough, that didn’t help. So, Sunny decides she’s going to figure out a way to get Drysdale to release him. Financial crimes aren’t really Sunny’s forte—much less shady, but not criminal, financial deals—but Spike is family and she figures she can learn as she goes.

She’s barely begun digging into Drysdale and his practices when she gets a call from Lee Farrell who needs a favor. His niece, a student at Taft*, was assaulted and she refuses to talk to the police or Lee. Can Sunny help? Sunny tries to talk to her, but Emily keeps saying it was just a misunderstanding and refuses to explain anything. Lee’s worried about her, Sunny’s concerned and nosy. So while Lee deals with a major homicide investigation, Sunny starts digging into Emily’s life.

* Yup, Taft, the Parker-verse’s all-purpose university for people who don’t go to Harvard.

Before Sunny can really get anywhere with the Drysdale investigation, she’s warned off. THat warning quickly becomes direct threats against her, Spike, Richie’s son, and her father. You have to admit, that’s really not the most clever approach. Sunny warns them all to be careful and works harder to find something. One of the biggest things she finds is a link between the two cases.

Ahh, a Little COVID-19 Fiction

Early on, we’re told that this starts shortly after the pandemic is over and life has gone back to something akin to normal. But vaguely so, especially when this was written, no one had an idea when exactly this would be, so Lupica left things vague.

Also, Spike’s is in trouble because of the impact that COVID has had on restaurants.

I lost count of how many times that Sunny talked about the world falling apart and getting worse. Clearly, this is a product of 2020 (and 2021). I remember hearing and reading authors last year talking about not being sure how to address COVID in their works—if they were even going to. This is probably the best way to do it—acknowledge it happened, look at the changes/difficulties it brought about—and don’t get into the details.

Poor Lee Farrell

This is my biggest beef with the novel—and the more that I think about it, the more it bothers me.

So, Lee’s got a big case that he’s dealing with and a family member in trouble—and he’s still not in the book that much. Belson plays a bigger role than Lee does in the book, which is fine because it’s not like Belson gets a lot of use in the Atkins novels, and he shouldn’t be put out to pasture. But this was a chance for Lee to get to shine and Lupica let it pass by.

I like Lee, and have since Paper Doll (he was one of the few good things in that novel), but Parker never used him all that much—and Lupica does the same. It’s time for Lee Farrell to really get a moment.

Sunny and The Men in Her Life

There are two other things that Lupica inherited from Parker that he’s maintained—but I’d like him to move on. From Family Honor on, there’s been this tension between Sunny’s independence, being able to make it as a female in a male-dominated world/industry and her being dependent on men like Richie and Spike (and a couple of others) to help out when things get dangerous. I can see revisiting the issue from time to time, but the authors have spent so much time on it, the reader has to wonder—why doesn’t Sunny do something about it? Either step up her fitness and martial arts training, or partner up with a female who can handle the shooting and hand-to-hand stuff. They exist.

Similarly is her seemingly everlasting tie to Richie, being unable to let him go—even as it’s clear she needs to, for at least his son’s sake. Her level of commitment to Jesse Stone could use some definition as well, but that’s not going to happen as long as Richie’s around (and, I’m not sure Jesse’s capable of it). Coleman was able to get Jesse to the point where he was able to let go of Jen (a move that was more overdue than Sunny and Jesse). I’d like to see Sunny do something similar, all that therapy she’s received should be enabling her to make some tough choices.

All that said, again, these are inherited themes, ideas, and characteristics. I’m not holding them against Lupica for maintaining it (he can only do so much without getting the fans to rebel). I just think it’d be nice to see.

So, what did I think about Payback?

Lupica is locked-in on this series, he’s got a handle on the characters and the stories he wants to tell and gets it done confidently, smoothly, and with just enough flair to keep the reader hooked and turning pages. This was his best yet. I’d describe his first two novels in this series as “good, for a Sunny Randall novel.” Payback. is doesn’t get the modifier. It’s good, period.

* I’ve got both hardcovers on the shelf next to me, after getting the eARCs from NetGalley. So if that sounds a little more back-handed than I mean that to be, maybe the fact that I shelled out for them takes a bit of the sting out of it.

The prose is crisp. It’s engaging and filled with a Parker-esque clarity and wit. The story is compelling and an interesting reaction to things in the zeitgeist, and the characters are as solidly drawn and executed as they were over two decades ago when Sunny debuted. New readers or established Sunny fans alike will find enough to entertain them and will likely come back for more—just like me. I recommend Payback to you.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from PENGUIN GROUP Putnam via NetGalley in exchange for this post—thanks to both for this.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Below Zero (Audiobook) by C. J. Box, David Chandler: Joe Pickett’s 9th Adventure is Almost Impossible to Believe

Before you read on—if you haven’t read the third book in the Joe Pickett series, Winterkill, you probably shouldn’t read anything else in this post. Really, it’s impossible for me to not ruin Winterkill and talk about this book.


Below Zero

Below Zero

by C. J. Box, David Chandler (Narrator)
Series: Joe Pickett, #9

Unabridged Audiobook, 10 hrs., 22 min.
Recorded Books, 2009

Read: March 24-25, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!


Don’t say I didn’t warn you if you haven’t read Winterkill…

What’s Below Zero About?

Joe Pickett’s daughter starts getting text messages from a very unlikely source: April, her foster sister. The sister that Joe watched die in a fire during a horrific FBI raid on a group of survivalists. Joe and Marybeth are skeptical at first—Sheridan is a little skeptical, but she wants to believe. Eventually, they provisionally accept that it is April texting them and Joe heads off to rendezvous with her.

The difficulty comes with April’s traveling companions—she’s fuzzy on the details, but the men she’s with are hurting people. Joe’s able to construct a path of where they’ve been (where they’re headed is pretty murky, though) and pieces together some sort of motive. The victims have been significant polluters in their own way—and he’s pretty sure that one of the killers is an environmental activist and the child of a notorious mobster, who might have been learning a lesson from his father.

Joe now has two goals—track down the person claiming to be April and see if she really is who she claims to be—and learn how she survived, and stop the killings.

The Balancing Act

Behind the murders stands a discussion about environmental concerns vs. real-world solutions vs. way of life in West. This is a theme of the last few books in the series (probably all of the books, it just feels more pronounced). Generally, when I’ve encountered this kind of thing it’s not dealt with very well—the novel preaches at readers about the environment, an unrealistic solution is approved/implemented, or the whole concern is shrugged off (either because it’s too late to do any good* or because the characters don’t accept the legitimacy of the concerns. I love the way Box does this and I wish more authors would learn from him.

* Yes, I realize that it might be too late, but we’re not going to focus on that right now.

Poor Old Lu

I don’t want to say that I’ve disliked Lucy, Joe’s younger daughter. But I’ve never been taken with her as I have been with the rest of the family. She’s too much like her grandmother I guess. She’s about clothes and nice things, not about wildlife or her family or whatever it is that makes Sheridan an interesting character.

But her reaction to the possibility of April being alive? What’s more, her reaction to Sheridan being the sole point of contact between Joe and April? It just broke my heart. I actually wanted her to get to tag along with her dad and sister for a change. I hope this is a sign of things to come and that I finally get the chance to get invested in the character.

David Chandler

I’ve got nothing to say here that I haven’t said before. Chandler is Pickett in my mind. When the TV series starts, I’m going to be comparing Michael Dorman to him (and I think Dorman’s not going to fare too well).

So, what did I think about Below Zero?

I hated, hated, hated the way that Box brought April back. This isn’t General Hospital or Days of Our Lives, after all. Also, it ruined some of the gut-punch of an ending of Winterkill. But by the end, Box had won me over and convinced me that it wasn’t the worst idea he’d ever had.

I do wonder how the traveling murderer story would have worked without the April aspect—part of me would have liked a closer focus on that. But I don’t know how much I’d have cared about them without April as a point-of-entry into that story.

I’m curious about where Joe and the family go from here. It’s possible I’ll totally get over my antagonism toward the April story within a book or two, it all depends on what Box does from here.


3.5 Stars

2021 Library Love Challenge 2021 Audiobook Challenge

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

PUB DAY REPOST: Blood and Treasure by Bob Drury, Tom Clavin: A Look at Dream Come Truers

Blood and Treasure

Blood and Treasure: Daniel Boone and the Fight for America’s First Frontier

by Bob Drury, Tom Clavin

eArc, 400 pg.
St. Martin’s Press, 2021

Read: April 5-14, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

What’s Blood and Treasure About?

It’s pretty much in the subtitle—this book is about 2 things—Daniel Boone and the fight (literal and metaphoric) for America’s first Frontier—with a focus on what we now know as Kentucky, but pretty much everything on the Western edge of the American colonies/states.

It’s not a biography of Boone (I’ll tell you now, I wrongly expected this to be more of one), it’s more like he’s the organizing principle for the book, as we learn about Boone’s roots, early life, and adulthood the authors talk about the conflicts with the Indians on the edge of white civilization’s expanse. We’d get a chunk of a wide-view of history over a period, and then we’d focus on Boone’s life around that time. Then the focus would widen a bit and we’d look at another period of time—and so on.

Two significant ingredients in “the Fight” for the Frontier were what’s called The French and Indian War and the American Revolution. There’s the French and Indian War (and conflicts that led up to it and sprang from it) to begin with, paved the way for the latter conflicts—we see the pressure put on various tribes from the expansion of settlers, the resistance those settlers faced (from shifting alliances of Indians between themselves, and varying alliances between Western powers and the Indians).

As for the Revolution—while most histories/documentaries/etc. about it will acknowledge the fighting in the South and West, few take any time to focus on it. Instead, we casual history readers just get repeated retellings of the stuff we learned in elementary school—Washington*, the Continent Army, Benedict Arnold, Nathan Hale, the Green Mountain Boys, and whatnot—and whatever expansions on some of those topics that Hamilton has taught us in the last few years. This book is a great corrective to that showing how the Indians were largely pawns for the British to use against the colonies, to distract from the larger skirmishes as well as to try to open up another front on the war—another way to steal power and influence from the colonies. You see very clearly how easily the entire War could’ve changed if not for a couple of significant losses suffered by the British and their Indian allies.

* Washington is also featured pretty heavily in the earlier chapters, too—even if he maybe only briefly met Boone on one occasion.

Language Choices

I know this sort of this is pretty customary, but I really appreciated the Note to Readers explaining the authors’ language choices—starting with the tribal designations they used—the standard versions accepted today (there are enough various entities mentioned throughout that if they’d gone with contemporary names and spellings, I—and most readers—would’ve been very confused).

At the same time, they did preserve the varied and non-standard spellings for just about everything else. For example, there were at least three variant spellings for Kentucky: Cantucky, Kanta-ke, and Kentucki (I think there was one more, but I can’t find it).

I was a little surprised that they stuck with the term “Indian” as much as they did—but their explanation for it seemed likely and understandable.

An Image Shattered—or maybe just Corrected

Yes, I know that the Fess Parker TV show I saw after school in syndication was only very loosely based in reality. And that the handful of MG-targeted biographies I read several times around the same time were sanitized and very partial. Still, those are the images and notions about Boone that have filled my mind for decades. So reading all the ways they were wrong and/or incomplete threw me more than I’m comfortable with.

His appearance was particularly jarring—the actual Boone eschewed coonskin caps because they were flat-topped and preferred a high-crowned felt hat to look taller. THat’s wrong on so many levels. “Tall as a mountain was he” is about as far from the truth as you can get.

The fact that he spent most of his life bouncing between comfort and/or wealth and massive debt is both a commentary on his strengths and weaknesses as it is the volatile times he lived in—he lost so much thanks to colonial governments being mercurial. It was reassuring to see the repeated insistence that he was an honest man, who worked to repay his debts even if it took too long.

In the end, Boone seemed to be a good guy trying his best to get by and provide for his family—who accidentally stepped into some degree of celebrity, that magnified some good qualities and replaced the man with a legend.

So, what did I think about Blood and Treasure?

The writing itself? There are moments that were fantastic. On the whole…., but from time to time, when Drury and Clavin wanted to drive an image or description home, they could be stunning. I would have preferred things to be a bit more even—a bit more balanced and consistent on that front. But the topic and scope didn’t really allow for that. So I’ll just enjoy those moments of it that I got.

As for the book as a whole? It was impressive, entertaining (generally), and informative. When it was at its best, it didn’t feel like reading dry history but a compelling look at that portion of US History. At its worst, it was a litany of names, dates, and ideas that didn’t do much for me. Thankfully, those moments were few and far between. It’s not a difficult read at any point, just pretty dry on occasion.

There are so many other things I’d like to have mentioned or discussed—but it would make this post unwieldy. The notes about hunting (both the good and the horrible), Boone’s heroics, his character, and family; various aspects of the Indian customs discussed and so much. There’s just so much in this book to chew on that I can’t sum it up.

I liked this—I liked it enough to look at a few other books by this duo to see what they can do with other topics, people, and eras. I think anyone with a modicum of interest in Boone will enjoy this and be glad for the experience.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from St. Martin’s Press via NetGalley in exchange for this post—thanks to both for this.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Robert B. Parker’s Payback by Mike Lupica: Sunny Does Some Dangerous Favors for Some Dear Friends

Payback

Robert P. Parker’s Payback

by Mike Lupica
Series: Sunny Randall, #9

eARC, 352 pg.
G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 2021

Read: April 14-15, 2021
Grab a copy from your local indie bookstore!

What’s Payback About?

Sunny’s closest friend, Spike, has got himself in trouble—he needed some financial assistance to keep the doors of his restaurant open (like just about every restaurant in 2020) and let a long-time customer and friend, a hedge fund manager, loan him the money. But when Spike tried to pay off the loan, he learned the hard way that Alex Drysdale wasn’t so much a friend as he was an opportunistic toad, and thanks to clever work on the contract, Spike had defaulted on the loan almost immediately.

Spike has already let his fists do the talking (and broken Drysdale’s nose), but oddly enough, that didn’t help. So, Sunny decides she’s going to figure out a way to get Drysdale to release him. Financial crimes aren’t really Sunny’s forte—much less shady, but not criminal, financial deals—but Spike is family and she figures she can learn as she goes.

She’s barely begun digging into Drysdale and his practices when she gets a call from Lee Farrell who needs a favor. His niece, a student at Taft*, was assaulted and she refuses to talk to the police or Lee. Can Sunny help? Sunny tries to talk to her, but Emily keeps saying it was just a misunderstanding and refuses to explain anything. Lee’s worried about her, Sunny’s concerned and nosy. So while Lee deals with a major homicide investigation, Sunny starts digging into Emily’s life.

* Yup, Taft, the Parker-verse’s all-purpose university for people who don’t go to Harvard.

Before Sunny can really get anywhere with the Drysdale investigation, she’s warned off. THat warning quickly becomes direct threats against her, Spike, Richie’s son, and her father. You have to admit, that’s really not the most clever approach. Sunny warns them all to be careful and works harder to find something. One of the biggest things she finds is a link between the two cases.

Ahh, a Little COVID-19 Fiction

Early on, we’re told that this starts shortly after the pandemic is over and life has gone back to something akin to normal. But vaguely so, especially when this was written, no one had an idea when exactly this would be, so Lupica left things vague.

Also, Spike’s is in trouble because of the impact that COVID has had on restaurants.

I lost count of how many times that Sunny talked about the world falling apart and getting worse. Clearly, this is a product of 2020 (and 2021). I remember hearing and reading authors last year talking about not being sure how to address COVID in their works—if they were even going to. This is probably the best way to do it—acknowledge it happened, look at the changes/difficulties it brought about—and don’t get into the details.

Poor Lee Farrell

This is my biggest beef with the novel—and the more that I think about it, the more it bothers me.

So, Lee’s got a big case that he’s dealing with and a family member in trouble—and he’s still not in the book that much. Belson plays a bigger role than Lee does in the book, which is fine because it’s not like Belson gets a lot of use in the Atkins novels, and he shouldn’t be put out to pasture. But this was a chance for Lee to get to shine and Lupica let it pass by.

I like Lee, and have since Paper Doll (he was one of the few good things in that novel), but Parker never used him all that much—and Lupica does the same. It’s time for Lee Farrell to really get a moment.

Sunny and The Men in Her Life

There are two other things that Lupica inherited from Parker that he’s maintained—but I’d like him to move on. From Family Honor on, there’s been this tension between Sunny’s independence, being able to make it as a female in a male-dominated world/industry and her being dependent on men like Richie and Spike (and a couple of others) to help out when things get dangerous. I can see revisiting the issue from time to time, but the authors have spent so much time on it, the reader has to wonder—why doesn’t Sunny do something about it? Either step up her fitness and martial arts training, or partner up with a female who can handle the shooting and hand-to-hand stuff. They exist.

Similarly is her seemingly everlasting tie to Richie, being unable to let him go—even as it’s clear she needs to, for at least his son’s sake. Her level of commitment to Jesse Stone could use some definition as well, but that’s not going to happen as long as Richie’s around (and, I’m not sure Jesse’s capable of it). Coleman was able to get Jesse to the point where he was able to let go of Jen (a move that was more overdue than Sunny and Jesse). I’d like to see Sunny do something similar, all that therapy she’s received should be enabling her to make some tough choices.

All that said, again, these are inherited themes, ideas, and characteristics. I’m not holding them against Lupica for maintaining it (he can only do so much without getting the fans to rebel). I just think it’d be nice to see.

So, what did I think about Payback?

Lupica is locked-in on this series, he’s got a handle on the characters and the stories he wants to tell and gets it done confidently, smoothly, and with just enough flair to keep the reader hooked and turning pages. This was his best yet. I’d describe his first two novels in this series as “good, for a Sunny Randall novel.” Payback. is doesn’t get the modifier. It’s good, period.

* I’ve got both hardcovers on the shelf next to me, after getting the eARCs from NetGalley. So if that sounds a little more back-handed than I mean that to be, maybe the fact that I shelled out for them takes a bit of the sting out of it.

The prose is crisp. It’s engaging and filled with a Parker-esque clarity and wit. The story is compelling and an interesting reaction to things in the zeitgeist, and the characters are as solidly drawn and executed as they were over two decades ago when Sunny debuted. New readers or established Sunny fans alike will find enough to entertain them and will likely come back for more—just like me. I recommend Payback to you.

Disclaimer: I received this eARC from PENGUIN GROUP Putnam via NetGalley in exchange for this post—thanks to both for this.


3.5 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Page 14 of 41

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén