Author: HCNewton Page 232 of 610

Saturday Miscellany—4/30/22 (a small one)

Odds ‘n ends about books and reading that caught my eye this week. You’ve probably seen some/most/all of them, but just in case:
bullet Today is Independent Bookstore Day—be sure to go spend some time at a store near you, they probably have something fun going on
bullet Why We are An Indie Bookstore—a short little post from the people who will be getting some of my money today
bullet Book Sales in the U.S. Are Stronger Than Ever
bullet Why Reading is Good for You: Neuroscientist and author Ali Hazelwood on the benefits of curling up with a book
bullet Why the Mystery Novel Is a Perfect Literary Form: David Gordon on the long, rich history of private eyes – and why contemporary novelists keep on turning to them.—Yup.
bullet “It’s The Most Stressful Book I’ve Ever Read, And I Couldn’t Put It Down”: People Are Sharing The Book They Wish They Could Read Again For The First Time—been there…
bullet Thank you and Goodnight!—one of my favorite book bloggers (despite how little our tastes overlap) calls it a night.
bullet Witty and Sarcastic Book Club is back with another Fantasy Focus, this month, tackling High and Epic Fantasy—there are some great reads and authors featured here.

A Book-ish Related Podcast episode (or two) you might want to give a listen to:
bullet Author Stories Podcast Episode 1224: Don Winslow interview—obviously they talk about City on Fire but listening to talk about writing and writers is a treat.

This Week’s New Releases that I’m Excited About and/or You’ll Probably See Here Soon (starting with one that I forgot last week):
bullet Against All Odds by Jeffery H. Haskell—Haskell steps away from super-heroes to launch a Military SF trilogy.
bullet City on Fire by Don Winslow—Winslow’s trilogy about the mafia in New England draws upon Homer and other classic epics. This looks fantastic.
bullet Rosebud by Paul Cornell—”When five sentient digital beings—condemned for over three hundred years to crew the small survey ship by the all-powerful Company—encounter a mysterious black sphere, their course of action is clear: obtain the object, inform the Company, earn lots of praise. But the ship malfunctions, and the crew has no choice but to approach the sphere and survey it themselves.”

Lastly, I’d like to say hi and extend a warm welcome to Raylene Second who followed the blog this week.

The Friday 56 for 4/29/22: A Mint Condition Corpse by Duncan MacMaster

The Friday 56This is a weekly bloghop hosted by Freda’s Voice.

RULES:
The Friday 56 Grab a book, any book.
The Friday 56 Turn to Page 56 or 56% on your ereader. If you have to improvise, that is okay.
The Friday 56 Find a snippet, short and sweet.
The Friday 56 Post it

from Page 56 of:
A Mint Condition Corpse by Duncan MacMaster

A Mint Condition Corpse by Duncan MacMaster

Molly Garret had to get out of that hotel room.

Air laden with car exhaust and tobacco smoke from Toronto’s furtive fugitive smokers was an improvement from the little two bed hotel room that was currently housing Molly and six other female artists, writers and editors. It could have been okay, Molly had survived it before, even enjoyed it as a form of urban camping, but Emma, a junior editor pushed Molly over the edge. Emma had purchased, then broken, a bottle of perfume that claimed to be Chanel, but smelled more like it washed ashore out of the English Channel. The lesson learned by everyone staying in that room was that the products sold by street vendors never matched what the labels said, in quality or odour.

(just not enough authors give attention to this sense, it’s really effective in creating a scene, right?)

Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City by K.J. Parker: A Curmudgeon to the Rescue?

Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled CitySixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City

by K.J. Parker

DETAILS:
Series: The Siege, #1
Publisher: Orbit
Publication Date: April 8, 2019
Format: Paperback
Length:  350 pg.
Read Date: April 20-25, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

According to the books (there’s an extensive literature on the subject) there are fifteen ways to defend a walled city. You can try one of them, and if that doesn’t work—

Indeed. But the books were written for generals, kings, emperors; better luck next time, and we have plenty more cities where that one came from. And, to be fair, each of the fifteen ways is practical and sensible, provided you’ve got an adequate garrison, and sufficient supplies and materiel, and a competent staff of trained officers making up a properly constituted chain of command.

What the books don’t tell you is, there’s a sixteenth way. You can use it when you’ve got nothing; no stuff, no men and nobody to lead them. Apart from that, it’s got nothing to recommend it whatsoever.

Fine, I thought. Let’s give it a go.

What’s Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City About?

Orhan is a colonel in charge of a company of engineers—and a very good one. He knows what it takes to work the system to equip his engineers with what they need (and if it takes forgery of official documents and bribery to get people to do their jobs, so be it). Then in the field, he gets his men to do what they need to do.

As his company returns from some bridge building and repair work, they start to suspect something is afoot (okay, more than that, but I’m trying to keep it vague) and they hustle back to “the City.” Once there, they discover that one mistake after another has been made and upon the engineers’ return, Orhan is the highest-ranking military officer in the City—and therefore, he’s solely responsible for defending the capital of the Robur empire.

Whoops.

Now, Orhan may not be the hero that the City deserves (although he might be), but is he the hero the City needs?

Orhan

This is one of those books where your enjoyment of the book is going to be wholly dependent on your opinion of the narrator/protagonist. If you enjoy his voice and are entertained by the idiomatic way he goes about his work, you’re going to have a good time reading this. If you read a few pages of this book and aren’t taken with him—do yourself a favor and move on.

He has almost no social skills and seems to thrive on offending those in power and authority (when he bothers to care about his social skills, that is). He’s confident-bordering-on-arrogant, misogynistic (although I think it’s more applied misanthropy than anything else), quick thinking, decisive, and too clever for his own good. This will strike some readers as off-putting, and would be in a real person, but it works in this fictional world.

Really, at the end of the day, it’s all about solving problems—give him a problem and he’ll come up with a solution, and everything else isn’t that important. It leaves a few bruised egos and ruffled feathers in his wake—but he gets the job done.

But man, the way he tells a story and his attitude throughout really works for me—I read those first few pages and knew we were going to be friends.

A Series?

I don’t see how this functions as the beginning of a trilogy without hurting the last couple of pages—I don’t know if this was intended to be the start of a series, or if that came later. If it was supposed to spawn a sequel all along, I misread the last chapter or two.

I really don’t think Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City needs more books to tell this story, but what do I know? Parker (and his alter-ego) have written so many books that they clearly understand story, so I assume that I’m wrong on this point—and he’s very likely doing something I don’t expect.

While I want to see how wrong I am, the fact that this works so well as a stand-alone makes me disinclined to jump on the sequel. I don’t need more in this story, as fun as it probably is.

So, what did I think about Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City?

“We’ve been ingenious, resourceful and inventive, and we haven’t let ourselves be hindered by outmoded or irrelevant ways of thinking. It’s a shame, really, because nobody will ever know how clever we were.”

The fact that the narrator lives long enough to leave a record suggests that his second-in-command is wrong in his evaluation of their chances—at least some will survive (and Orhan mentions that a few times). But still, you know that a besieged city doesn’t have a lot going for it, and reading about the siege should be grim going. And it is at times, but that doesn’t stop this from being a fun fantasy read—almost all of that is due to the narrative voice, this isn’t a comedy by any means. But it is frequently funny.

This really struck me as similar to what Sand dan Glokta went through in defending the city of Dagoska. However many his faults, Orhan is no Glotka—he’s not as vicious, he really doesn’t torture anyone, and he’s not as limited by his own injuries. But there is something about the two characters that are similar. Orhan also reminds me of R. Wilson Rogers from Zieja’s Epic Failure series—an engineer who knows how to get things done in the Armed Forces (by manipulating the system) who is thrust into a leadership role at a critical time. Orhan really is the overlapping area in the Venn diagram of Glotka and Rogers, the more I think of it.

Several of the characters could be drawn better—but they really don’t need to be, we get enough depth to understand them, but not much more. It fits with Orhan’s character—he sees most of them as tools to use in solving his problems. You don’t spend a lot of time thinking about your hammer’s backstory. He does understand, and helps the readers to understand, the more important figures in the story. In most books, I’d criticize the lack of depth, but in this one, it actually fits.

There are a few battle scenes, but not to the extent you would get in similar books—Orhan and his men aren’t fighters by trade, they’re builders. So even the fight scenes are different than what you’re used to. I’m all for variety—especially variety that fits with the story.

There’s a whole lot going for this book, and little to complain about—for a fun, fairly quick, fantasy read, give Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City a shot.


3.5 Stars
This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

BOOK SPOTLIGHT: The Carnival of Ash by Tom Beckerlegge

I’m very pleased today to welcome The Write Reads Ultimate Blog Tour for Tom Beckerlegge’s The Carnival of Ash. I couldn’t fit it into my reading schedule, but if you take a look at the feed for https://twitter.com/WriteReadsTours, you’ll see a lot of bloggers who did find the time to write interesting things about it. Still, I wanted to spread the word a bit.

The Carnival of Ash Tour Banner

Book Details:

Genre: Adult Fantasy
Publisher: Rebellion Publishing
Release date: March 15, 2022
Format: Paperback/Ebook/Audiobook
Length: 528 pages
The Carnival of Ash

About the Book:

An extravagant, lyrical fantasy about a city of poets and librarians. A city that never was.

Cadenza is the City of Words, a city run by poets, its skyline dominated by the steepled towers of its libraries, its heart beating to the stamp and thrum of the printing presses in the Printing Quarter.

Carlo Mazzoni, a young wordsmith arrives at the city gates intent on making his name as the bells ring out with the news of the death of the city’s poet-leader. Instead, he finds himself embroiled with the intrigues of a city in turmoil, the looming prospect of war with their rival Venice ever-present. A war that threatens not only to destroy Cadenza but remove it from history altogether…

Book Links:

Amazon ~ Goodreads

About the Author:

Tom BeckerleggeTom Beckerlegge grew up in the northwest of England in a house filled with books. Writing as Tom Becker, he won the Waterstones Children’s Book Prize with his debut novel; The Carnival of Ash is his first adult book. He lives in Enfield with his wife and young son.
 


My thanks to The Write Reads for the invitation to participate in this tour and the materials they provided.

How to Be Perfect (Audiobook) by Michael Schur: Being Ethical/Virtuous and Funny at the Same Time

How to Be PerfectHow to Be Perfect:
The Correct Answer to
Every Moral Question

by Michael Schur (Writer, Narrator)
with: Michael Schur, Kristen Bell, D’Arcy Carden, Ted Danson, William Jackson Harper, Manny Jacinto, Marc Evan Jackson, Jameela Jamil, and Todd May

DETAILS:
Publisher: Simon & Schuster Audio
Publication Date: January 25, 2022
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 9 hrs., 13 min.
Read Date: April 11-13, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

What’s How to Be Perfect About?

From the Publisher’s Website:

Most people think of themselves as “good,” but it’s not always easy to determine what’s “good” or “bad”—especially in a world filled with complicated choices and pitfalls and booby traps and bad advice. Fortunately, many smart philosophers have been pondering this conundrum for millennia and they have guidance for us. With bright wit and deep insight, How to Be Perfect explains concepts like deontology, utilitarianism, existentialism, ubuntu, and more so we can sound cool at parties and become better people.

Schur starts off with easy ethical questions like “Should I punch my friend in the face for no reason?” (No.) and works his way up to the most complex moral issues we all face. Such as: Can I still enjoy great art if it was created by terrible people? How much money should I give to charity? Why bother being good at all when there are no consequences for being bad? And much more. By the time the book is done, we’ll know exactly how to act in every conceivable situation, so as to produce a verifiably maximal amount of moral good. We will be perfect, and all our friends will be jealous. OK, not quite. Instead, we’ll gain fresh, funny, inspiring wisdom on the toughest issues we face every day.

Schur did a lot of thinking, reading, and research into ethics as he was creating and writing The Good Place, this book comes out of that—it’s not quite the same as the classes that Chidi Anagonye would give, but it’s about as close are you’re going to get.

Morally Problematic Sandwiches

The most important part of becoming better people, I’ll say yet again, is that we care about whether what we do is good or bad, and therefore try to do the right thing. If we love a problematic person or thing too much to part with it altogether, I think that means we have to keep two ideas in our head at the same time: I love this thing. The person who made it is troubling.

One of the chapters I found most interesting—for a variety of reasons—is Chapter Ten, “This Sandwich Is Morally Problematic. But it’s also Delicious. Can I Still Eat It?”

For a range of issues, a lot of people struggle with things like watching Woody Allen or Kevin Spacey movies; listening to Michael Jackson; enjoying The Cosby Show; reading J. K. Rowling, Orson Scott Card, or Stacey Abrams novels; or eating Chick-fil-A or Burger King. This chapter explores how someone can enjoy these things while maintaining their ethical/political/social position.

Like almost every topic Schur addressed, I enjoyed seeing the way he approached the topic, and the kind of thinking he applied to it, more than I liked his conclusions. Although, I think I came closer to agreeing with him on this one than the rest. This is a common thread for me when it comes to non-theistic/atheistic philosophy, so I go into something like this expecting it. Interestingly, Schur’s conclusions on this idea come close to Alan Jacobs’ (Christian) conclusions in Breaking Bread with the Dead—not identical, but they strike me as pretty compatible.

The Narration

I frequently approach author-narrated works with a degree of trepidation, but I didn’t this time. Michael Schur knows what he’s doing, and I reflexively assumed that. He’s very capable of delivering this material in an interesting, almost conversational manner—as this book is a crystalization of his thoughts and the result of his research, he’s a great vehicle for this material.

And then there’s the rest of the cast…clearly, when Schur thinks “Virtue Ethics” he thinks about The Good Place and got the cast involved (along with Todd May, an actual ethicist). Would Schur on his own have been fine? Absolutely. But just having different voices helps break up what could be dry listening and add a level of variety that helps, it’s also good for distinguishing Schur’s words from a citation from any number of sources. And any time you can add Ted Danson’s voice to something, you know it’s going to improve things (I wonder if I could handle Marc Evan Jackson for an entire audiobook, or would that be too much of a good thing?).

I did have to do a mental double-take every time Manny Jacinto read, I’m not used to his normal voice.

Basically, narrator-wise, there’s nothing to complain about here.

So, what did I think about How to Be Perfect?

This is one of those books that invites you to stop and think about it. I don’t have the time or energy to do this, but what I really wanted to do when I finished this was to buy a hard copy of the book and sit down to work through it a few times to really engage with the ideas. I know myself well enough to realize I wouldn’t do it—or wouldn’t do it well enough to satisfy myself. But that was my initial reaction.

It’s a good book—it’s problematic in some of/many of its conclusions, sure, but it’s still a good book. Because of the nature of the show that this is based on, Schur produced something that assumes God does not exist. He doesn’t come out and deny or question it*, he simply writes as if that’s not something to be considered. So I’m obviously not going to be able to agree with everything he says, and will ultimately find fatal flaws to some of his conclusions—but that’s me. You’ll have your own set of issues, I’m sure. But when it comes to recent(ish) pop-philosophy books, this is better than many.

* Later in the book, there’s at least one shot at the notion of a reliable set of scriptures, or those who would pay attention to them, at any rate. But As far as attacks on religion go, it’s pretty mild.

I truly appreciated and enjoyed the way that Schur was able to explain the concepts he was wrestling with and the way he used humor throughout. Using himself as an example of ethical reasoning—especially as a negative example—made it all much more relatable, too. He never comes across as “you should live like this” but as “here’s what I’ve learned, here’s where I struggle, walk alongside me.”

Would I listen to this again? Yeah, absolutely. Would I go through the hard copy of the book? Sure (especially if I could find a way to take the time to do it right). Would I suggest you get the book in the medium of your choice? Absolutely. Entertaining, educational, funny, and thought-provoking. I’m not sure what else you could ask for.


4 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

WWW Wednesday, April 27, 2022

We are in the backstretch of this week, the last of April, and I keep finding myself making plans for June and July, as if May doesn’t even exist. This is a little ironic, because I’ve got a lot of commitments lined up for May. Maybe it’s because I have so much of the month already scheduled that I can’t focus on it. I was going somewhere when I started this paragraph, and I can’t remember where it was. Guess that means that it’s time to get on with the WWW Wednesday of it all.

This meme was formerly hosted by MizB at A Daily Rhythm and revived on Taking on a World of Words—and shown to me by Aurore-Anne-Chehoke at Diary-of-a-black-city-girl.

The Three Ws are:

What are you currently reading?
What did you recently finish reading?
What do you think you’ll read next?

Easy enough, right?

What are you currently reading?

I’m reading Of Claws and Fangs: Stories from the World of Jane Yellowrock and Soulwood by Faith Hunter for a Book Tour next week and am listening to Taming Demons for Beginners by Annette Marie, Cris Dukehart (Narrator) on audiobook (if I wasn’t really curious about other parts of this series, I’m not sure I’d stick it out—this protagonist is doing nothing but making foolish/stupid moves—I have to pause occasionally just to growl at her).

Of Claws and FangsBlank SpaceTaming Demons for Beginners

What did you recently finish reading?

I just finished K.J. Parker’s surprising Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled City and the classic The Return of the King by J.R.R. Tolkien, Andy Serkis (Narrator) on audio.

Sixteen Ways to Defend a Walled CityBlank SpaceThe Return of the King

What do you think you’ll read next?

My next book should be The Knave of Secrets by Alex Livingston—also for a Book Tour next week—and my next audiobook should be Tuesday Mooney Talks To Ghosts by Kate Racculia, Lauren Fortgang (Narrator)—which has been on my TBR forever, and I just stumbled onto the audiobook. Yay!

The Knave of SecretsBlank SpaceTuesday Mooney Talks To Ghosts

What about you? Anything good?

Force of Nature (Audiobook) by C.J. Box, David Chandler (Narrator): Wyoming Requiem

I’ve ended up working on this post a lot longer than most—definitely longer than any other book in this series. I know I didn’t say everything I wanted to, but I think I covered all the essentials. I also think my trimming ideas/paragraphs/rabbit trails didn’t make this too difficult to follow. Let me know if I missed that mark, will you?


Force of NatureForce of Nature

by C. J. Box, David Chandler (Narrator)

DETAILS:
Series: Joe Pickett, #12
Publisher: Recorded Books
Publication Date: March 20, 2012
Format: Unabridged Audiobook
Length: 11 hrs., 23 min.
Read Date: April 13-15, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

What’s Force of Nature About?

Nate Romanowski.

That’s the short version anyway—but it’s not a helpful answer.

Since we met Nate, we’ve known that he’s living off the grid for more than philosophical reasons—he’s not just a modern Thoreau, But we’ve never been given the story behind that. He’s offered to tell Joe, but Joe’s smart enough to know he shouldn’t know (but he is curious).

Well now, those people he’s been avoiding are getting close to finding him. They are approaching, questioning, kidnapping (if deemed necessary), and putting all other sorts of pressure on those who may know something about Nate or his whereabouts. This includes new characters as well as well-established characters—including all the Picketts, his friends on the reservation, his mysterious friends in Idaho, and others.

To protect those who are important to him, Nate has to stop hiding and go on the offense. Along the way, the reader gets answers to a lot of the questions about him that we’ve built up over the previous eleven novels.

We also get another lesson in watching out for your ears around Nate Romanowski, just in case Free Fire wasn’t enough for you.

Yes, there are several other things going on, but they all tie back to Nate Romanowski—his past, his present, and if he has a future.

A Gripe

This is semi-spoilery, but without this, I might have rated this higher, so I have to talk about it. I don’t think reading this is going to ruin anything plot-wise. Still, feel free to skip down to the next heading.

Nate, Joe, and Marybeth all agree that the Picketts have to get out of town for their own safety. So Joe, Marybeth, April, and Lucy get to the airport so they can get out of the reach of those who might try to use them to get to Nate.

See the problem there? I said nothing about Sheridan. Sure, she’s away at college, but we’re talking about people who have gone to Idaho and Colorado to find people to get leverage on Nate. Does anyone really think they can’t get to Laramie? Yes, Joe sends his FBI buddy to talk to her, but that’s to get information, not to watch out for her.

I literally kept talking back to the recording, “What about Sheridan?” Is it possible I missed the two sentences it would’ve taken for Box to justify this choice, but I don’t think that’s the case.

David Chandler

This is book 12, David Chandler has this series down—I’m sure he’s not on auto-pilot or anything, but at this point, it’s got to be comfortable for him.

That said, he’s on his game here, and really gets to stretch his wings a little—there’s (obviously) more Nate than usual, and Nate has a greater emotional range than usual, too. Bang-up job by Chandler.

So, what did I think about Force of Nature?

This is the most action-packed, violent, and unpredictable Joe Pickett novel yet. I’m not sure it’s even close—I’m not sure it’s the best novel in the series, but I’m guessing it’s quite the fan-favorite because of all the Nate material.

It’s the C.J. Box-equivalent of Robert Crais’ L.A. Requiem where we get all of Joe Pike’s background* in the midst of a gripping thrill ride. There’s a version of this post that contains several paragraphs comparing/contrasting these two novels that I’m sorely tempted to write, but I can’t imagine anyone wanting to read it all. This will both serve to humanize Nate as well as build up his mystique. A nice trick to be sure.

* I just got a very real lesson in careful typing by invoking Joe Pike in a discussion about a Joe Pickett novel.

Am I happy to have a lot of questions answered about Nate? Yes. Do I have a whole bunch of new questions about him? Yes. Do I sort of hope that he disappears for at least a book so we can refocus on Joe? Yes. Do I think that anyone with a mild interest in the Joe Pickett series will dig this novel? No doubt in my mind.


4 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Book Blogger Hop: From Beginning to End?

Book Blogger Hop

 

This prompt was submitted by Elizabeth @ Silver’s Reviews:

Do you finish reading every book that you have slotted for a review?

Step One in answering this is determining what the question means by “slotted.” Really, every book I pick up I plan on blogging about—the whole point of this endeavor is to keep me from treating books like disposable items and to think about them.

Once or twice a year, though, I just can’t finish a book because of time or interest. But those are books that I’ve told myself I’d blog about, so I’m not sure that counts as “slotted” (I don’t count them like that).

On the other hand, there are books that I’ve told others I’d blog about. If we’re talking about a NetGalley or Book Tour book, then yes, I finish it (sometimes I sacrifice sleep or mood to do so, but yeah, I’ll finish it). If it’s a book I agreed to blog about that an author/publisher/publicist sent me, then yes—that’s the deal I make with them: if they provide it, I’ll read it and talk about it. No matter what I think of it.

There’s been one exception to that—an author sent me a Space Opera trilogy. I read 2.3 (or so, I don’t remember exactly) of the books, and had pretty positive things to say about the first two. I wasn’t crazy about the third, but I was curious about where the story was going to end up and had faith in the overall plot. Then everything fell apart and I just had to stop, I couldn’t force myself to continue.

That was almost five years ago, however, and I’ve been doing this for about 9 years. I figure I can make one exception to my rule. I don’t have real numbers, nor do I have time/inclination to get them–but I figure I’m north of 99% on completion.

This, I guess is just a long-winded way of answering, “Yes.”

What about you?

Old Made New by Greg Lanier: A Practical and Engaging Guide for Laypeople

Old Made NewOld Made New:
A Guide to the New Testament
Use of the Old Testament

by Greg Lanier

DETAILS:
Publisher: Crossway
Publication Date: April 12, 2022
Format: Paperback
Length: 137
Read Date: April 10-17, 2022
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

What’s Old Made New About?

Lanier’s goal is to enable the average reader of the New Testament to understand how and why the authors would use an Old Testament passage at a particular point. As often as the NT uses the OT, that’s so important.

He begins—and this is beyond sad that he has to—by explaining why the reader of the NT would want to understand their use of the OT. He then differs his approach from others—primarily he’s not going to get bogged down in or distracted by technical considerations. As interesting as I find that kind of thing, he has a point.

In Chapter 1, he explains his method for analyzing the NT usage of a portion of the OT (I won’t get into that here), and then he spends the next few chapters demonstrating it.

The bulk of the book consists in tracing the NT authors’ engagement with the OT along three major themes:
Chapter 2—articulating the gospel in terms of the saving work of God in history and the gift of salvation to individual believers
Chapter 3—articulating the fullness of Jesus in his person and work, both as divine Son and human Savior
Chapter 4—articulating the identity of the church as eschatological Israel, as well as its mission and conduct for today

Each chapter has a mix of shorter examples that help prove out these themes, as well as longer case studies (six per chapter) that model for the reader how to do the work.

Appendix

There is a fourteen-page appendix to this book, “Inventory of New Testament Uses of the Old Testament,” listing most of the major agreed-upon uses of the Old Testament in order of New Testament chapter and verse, and then notes what kind of NT usage (Quotation, Allusion, Citation). There are some disagreements about what verses are NT uses of the Old, so Lanier keeps it to those with widespread agreement.

This is a very useful list both for the sake of reference and to help the reader practice the principles in the book. I know I’m coming back to this appendix.

I would’ve liked another version of this list using the same data, but in order of the OT book/chapter/verse—only to make things easier.

So, what did I think about Old Made New?

Lanier did a great job of balancing explaining his points with demonstrating the principles, and showing why the reader would want to use these principles. This is an engaging book, an eminently practical read, and an easy-to-use hermeneutic guide.

I really liked Lanier’s 3-step approach to analyzing the usages, it’s easy to wrap your brain around both as an example and for following the example. His case studies are both great object lessons and interesting for what he shows about the passage. I’d have had no problem reading these chapters if they were twice as long for personal benefit. Getting a handle on tools like this is such an aide for personal study and understanding, and Lanier’s given the Church a great gift with such an easy-to-understand and easy-to-use guide.

I definitely recommend this to your attention, study, and application. You’ll be rewarded.


4 Stars

This post contains an affiliate link. If you purchase from it, I will get a small commission at no additional cost to you. As always, opinions are my own.

Saturday Miscellany—4/23/22

On Monday, I hit a little landmark:

A few years ago, I’d struggle to get 4 posts a week–so it came as a surprise when WP let me know last year that I’d gone 30-40 days in a row ( the details are fuzzy). Then I turned it into a personal challenge–could I hit 100? It was unexpectedly easy. Then I decided to try for a year. I will admit I struggled a bit, but I managed to pull it off. A few months back, I thought about taking the day after the one-year mark off, but I forgot to. Now, I’m not shooting for 2 years, but I have no intention of taking a break or going back to my early/very sporadic days. I like the discipline–but if I happen to miss a day, I’m not going to sweat it.*

Much.

Anyway, you didn’t come here for my own horn-tooting, on with the miscellany:
Odds ‘n ends about books and reading that caught my eye this week. You’ve probably seen some/most/all of them, but just in case:
bullet I’m a High School Junior. Let’s Talk About ‘Huckleberry Finn’ and ‘Mockingbird.’—worth a read if you can evade the paywall
bullet A preview clip from CBS Saturday Morning (the whole thing just aired, I guess) where Don Winslow announces his retirement—from writing, anyway. Hate to see him set down the pen, but at least I now have a chance to catch up on the backlog.
bullet There’s more Winslow to come on this list, he does have a book releasing next week, and I’m excited for it.
bulletMurder, revenge, power: Don Winslow reveals classical inspirations for crime novel ‘City On Fire’—Nunc hoc in marmore non est incisum
bullet Author Don Winslow Reveals Why We’re Obsessed With the Mafia and What’s To Love About His New England Mafia Book City on Fire
bullet He also tweeted this video from his Polish publisher showing the book printed—I could watch this kind of thing all day
bullet Neil Gaiman on book bans and the secret to a good book-to-film adaptation—anytime is a good time for a Gaiman interview
bullet A Veterinarian’s Perspective on Writing Animals—I’d already put this vet’s book on my list when I read this piece on CrimeReads. Now I’ve moved it a little higher on the list.
bullet Rarely Seen Paintings by J.R.R. Tolkien Portray a Lush ‘Lord of the Rings’ Landscape—ooh…
bullet Ben Aaronovitch Celebrates 11 Years of ‘RIVERS OF LONDON’—haven’t had a chance to watch this yet, but looking foward to it.
bullet 8 Reasons Why Reading Is Better Than Sleeping—in case there was any doubt
bullet Do You Annotate? Pros and Cons
bullet Are Readers Patient?—a question I’d never have thought to ask
bullet Alternatives to Goodreads: Literal—I’d never heard of this Goodreads Alternative.
bullet It’s okay to collect books—yup
bullet The books that shaped me as a reader – The Early Years!—I love reading things like this
bullet The Problem With “Problematic” | The Book Community’s Perpetual Witch Hunt—I wouldn’t co-sign every jot and tittle of this, but most of them….

This Week’s New Releases that I’m Excited About and/or You’ll Probably See Here Soon:
bullet Pay Dirt Road by Samantha Jayne Allen—a small Texas town is rocked by the murder of a waitress. Which is a lousy way to pitch this, but in a sentence, that’s as good as I can do. Why don’t you just read my post about it?
bullet King Of The Crows Anniversary Edition by Russell Day—This was one of my (possibly the) favorites of 2020, the anniversary edition looks gorgeous. Get it while you can.
bullet Blood Sugar by Sascha Rothchild—A woman fights to clear her name after being falsely accused of murdering her husband. But she has killed three other people…
bullet The Sweet Goodbye by Ron Corbett—An FBI agent looks into small-town corruption in northern Maine.
bullet Fifty-Four Pigs by Philipp Schott—A Canadian veterinarian investigates a murder to save a friend

Lastly, I’d like to say hi and extend a warm welcome to Sarah Tavanello, who followed the blog this week. Don’t be a stranger!

Page 232 of 610

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén